439 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18312963)
21. Medicare payments for noninvasive diagnostic imaging are now higher to nonradiologist physicians than to radiologists.
Levin DC; Rao VM; Parker L; Frangos AJ; Sunshine JH
J Am Coll Radiol; 2011 Jan; 8(1):26-32. PubMed ID: 21211761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Abolishing fee-for-service reimbursement is good for the profession of radiology: a debate from the 2013 AMCLC, Resident and Fellow Section meeting.
Lall N; Jha S; Hawkins CM
J Am Coll Radiol; 2013 Dec; 10(12):974-6. PubMed ID: 24295950
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Health reform and imaging.
Thrall JH
J Am Coll Radiol; 2009 Jan; 6(1):2-3. PubMed ID: 19111260
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Pay-for-performance--financial health disparities and the impact on healthcare disparities.
Hood RG
J Natl Med Assoc; 2007 Aug; 99(8):953-8. PubMed ID: 17722677
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Managed care and the radiologist: expectations and future trends.
Kessler HB
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Jul; 163(1):1-3. PubMed ID: 8010192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Expansion of pay-for-performance will change the way payers compensate health systems.
Med Netw Strategy Rep; 1997 Jul; 6(7):1-3. PubMed ID: 10168689
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Traditional fee-for-service Medicare payment systems and fragmented patient care: the backdrop for non-operating room procedures and anesthesia services.
Kane NM
Anesthesiol Clin; 2009 Mar; 27(1):7-15. PubMed ID: 19361763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Pay for performance (P4P).
Leitman M; Adusumilli PS
Natl Med J India; 2008; 21(1):44-5. PubMed ID: 18472703
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Agency theory: a framework for analyzing physician services.
Pontes MC
Health Care Manage Rev; 1995; 20(4):57-67. PubMed ID: 8543471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Doctors; conscience, care and pay.
Gingras G
Can Med Assoc J; 1978 Apr; 118(7):863-4. PubMed ID: 638916
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. House calls or "concierge medicine".
Tenn Med; 2006 Sep; 99(9):9-10. PubMed ID: 17225774
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Medically unbelievable edits: unbelievable indeed.
Duszak R
J Am Coll Radiol; 2007 Mar; 4(3):187-8. PubMed ID: 17412261
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Unhealthy trends: the future of physician services.
Pham HH; Ginsburg PB
Health Aff (Millwood); 2007; 26(6):1586-98. PubMed ID: 17978379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Global fees for minimally invasive surgeries.
OR Manager; 1996 Nov; 12(11):26-7. PubMed ID: 10172803
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Will fee-for-service go the way of Marcus Welby?
Pretzer M
Med Econ; 1994 Feb; 71(4):144-8, 150-2. PubMed ID: 10131900
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. The struggle between managed care and fee-for-service practice.
Iglehart JK
N Engl J Med; 1994 Jul; 331(1):63-7. PubMed ID: 8202118
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. An Analysis of Quality Measures in Diagnostic Radiology with Suggestions for Future Advancement.
Heller RE
J Am Coll Radiol; 2016 Oct; 13(10):1182-1187. PubMed ID: 27480817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Radiology and the health care reform debate.
Van Moore A
J Am Coll Radiol; 2006 Aug; 3(8):569-70. PubMed ID: 17412126
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Pay for performance in myocardial infarction: are we reaping the rewards?
Petersen LA
Nat Clin Pract Cardiovasc Med; 2008 Mar; 5(3):134-5. PubMed ID: 18059383
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Adapting.
Pearlman AS
J Am Soc Echocardiogr; 2009 Sep; 22(9):1080-1. PubMed ID: 19733793
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
