445 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18312963)
41. Reviewing your physician compensation plan.
Weymier R
Physician Exec; 2004; 30(5):68-70. PubMed ID: 15506540
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
42. Appropriateness criteria: the double-edged sword.
Borgstede JP
J Am Coll Radiol; 2004 Dec; 1(12):889-90. PubMed ID: 17411725
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
43. The fee-for-service system should be replaced.
Wright CJ
CMAJ; 1991 Apr; 144(7):900-3. PubMed ID: 2007243
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
44. Survey reveals emphasis on tying pay to quality. Physician executive pay increase holds steady near 7 percent.
Westfall C
Physician Exec; 2005; 31(6):32-4, 36-7. PubMed ID: 16382649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Self-dealing in medical imaging: call for action.
Reicher MA
J Am Coll Radiol; 2007 Apr; 4(4):202-7. PubMed ID: 17412267
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
46. Cost of new oncology drugs.
Newcomer L
Clin Adv Hematol Oncol; 2010 May; 8(5):313-4. PubMed ID: 20551889
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
47. How doctors are paid now, and why it has to change.
Carroll J
Manag Care; 2007 Dec; 16(12):22-6, 30. PubMed ID: 18198726
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
48. Will pay for performance programs introduce a new set of problems?
Sipkoff M
Manag Care; 2004 May; 13(5):16-7, 21-2. PubMed ID: 15181684
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
49. Reassignment reform: a possible regulatory tool to stunt the growth of in-office imaging.
Greeson TW; Zimmerman HM
J Am Coll Radiol; 2007 Jun; 4(6):406-10. PubMed ID: 17544142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. What makes it work?
Fan N
Del Med J; 2015 Mar; 87(3):73-4. PubMed ID: 25985539
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
51. Bonus/incentive programs to increase physician productivity in academic emergency medicine.
Zun LS; Moss D
Am J Emerg Med; 1996 May; 14(3):334-6. PubMed ID: 8639219
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
52. The transformation of diagnostic radiology in the ACO era.
Seltzer SE; Lee TH
JAMA; 2014 Jul; 312(3):227-8. PubMed ID: 25027135
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
53. CFPC alternate funding model.
Kerr TA
Can Fam Physician; 1995 Feb; 41():209-11. PubMed ID: 7734992
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
54. Altruism, professional decorum, and greed: perspectives on physician compensation.
Schiedermayer D; McCarty DJ
Perspect Biol Med; 1995; 38(2):238-53. PubMed ID: 7899058
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
55. Clarifying the relationship between nonradiologists' financial interest in imaging and their utilization of imaging.
Bhargavan M; Sunshine JH; Hughes DR
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2011 Nov; 197(5):W891-9. PubMed ID: 22021538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. And then there were none.
King K
J Okla State Med Assoc; 2009 Sep; 102(9):288-9. PubMed ID: 19856820
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
57. Pay for performance--a clash of cultures.
Fink L
Physician Exec; 2006; 32(4):34-8. PubMed ID: 16889295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Patients, not costs, come first.
Dyer AR
Hastings Cent Rep; 1986 Feb; 16(1):5-7. PubMed ID: 3082801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. What you do not know about disease management: a new ally in the pay-for-performance era.
Peck CA
J Med Pract Manage; 2008; 23(6):332-5. PubMed ID: 18615996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Influence of pay-for-performance programs on information technology use among child health providers: the devil is in the details.
Menachemi N; Struchen-Shellhorn W; Brooks RG; Simpson L
Pediatrics; 2009 Jan; 123 Suppl 2():S92-6. PubMed ID: 19088236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
