These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

190 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18315407)

  • 1. How does bilingualism improve executive control? A comparison of active and reactive inhibition mechanisms.
    Colzato LS; Bajo MT; van den Wildenberg W; Paolieri D; Nieuwenhuis S; La Heij W; Hommel B
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Mar; 34(2):302-12. PubMed ID: 18315407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Executive control in a modified antisaccade task: Effects of aging and bilingualism.
    Bialystok E; Craik FI; Ryan J
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Nov; 32(6):1341-54. PubMed ID: 17087588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Executive functions and inhibitory control in multilingual children: evidence from second-language learners, bilinguals, and trilinguals.
    Poarch GJ; van Hell JG
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2012 Dec; 113(4):535-51. PubMed ID: 22892367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The development of selective inhibitory control: the influence of verbal labeling.
    Kray J; Kipp KH; Karbach J
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2009 Jan; 130(1):48-57. PubMed ID: 19084817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Bilingualism and adult differences in inhibitory mechanisms: evidence from a bilingual stroop task.
    Mohamed Zied K; Phillipe A; Pinon K; Havet-Thomassin V; Aubin G; Roy A; Le Gall D
    Brain Cogn; 2004 Apr; 54(3):254-6. PubMed ID: 15050787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Distinct neural correlates for two types of inhibition in bilinguals: response inhibition versus interference suppression.
    Luk G; Anderson JA; Craik FI; Grady C; Bialystok E
    Brain Cogn; 2010 Dec; 74(3):347-57. PubMed ID: 20965635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. On the time course of exogenous cueing effects in bilinguals: higher proficiency in a second language is associated with more rapid endogenous disengagement.
    Mishra RK; Hilchey MD; Singh N; Klein RM
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2012; 65(8):1502-10. PubMed ID: 22512692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. On the bilingual advantage in conflict processing: now you see it, now you don't.
    Costa A; Hernández M; Costa-Faidella J; Sebastián-Gallés N
    Cognition; 2009 Nov; 113(2):135-49. PubMed ID: 19729156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Neural correlates of spatial and non-spatial inhibition of return (IOR) in attentional orienting.
    Zhou X; Chen Q
    Neuropsychologia; 2008 Sep; 46(11):2766-75. PubMed ID: 18597795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Inhibition of return in subliminal letter priming.
    Marzouki Y; Grainger J; Theeuwes J
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Sep; 129(1):112-20. PubMed ID: 18582840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Executive and motivational inhibition: associations with self-report measures related to inhibition.
    Shuster J; Toplak ME
    Conscious Cogn; 2009 Jun; 18(2):471-80. PubMed ID: 19233688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Musical expertise, bilingualism, and executive functioning.
    Bialystok E; Depape AM
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Apr; 35(2):565-74. PubMed ID: 19331508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Automaticity of cognitive control: goal priming in response-inhibition paradigms.
    Verbruggen F; Logan GD
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Sep; 35(5):1381-8. PubMed ID: 19686032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cueing the location of a distractor: an inhibitory mechanism of spatial attention?
    Munneke J; Van der Stigchel S; Theeuwes J
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Sep; 129(1):101-7. PubMed ID: 18589391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of stop signal modality, stop signal intensity and tracking method on inhibitory performance as determined by use of the stop signal paradigm.
    van der Schoot M; Licht R; Horsley TM; Sergeant JA
    Scand J Psychol; 2005 Aug; 46(4):331-41. PubMed ID: 16014077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Reaction time inhibition from subliminal cues: is it related to inhibition of return?
    Mele S; Savazzi S; Marzi CA; Berlucchi G
    Neuropsychologia; 2008 Feb; 46(3):810-9. PubMed ID: 18206184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Precueing spatial S-R correspondence: is there regulation of expected response conflict?
    Wühr P; Kunde W
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Aug; 34(4):872-83. PubMed ID: 18665732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Early bilingualism enhances mechanisms of false-belief reasoning.
    Kovács AM
    Dev Sci; 2009 Jan; 12(1):48-54. PubMed ID: 19120412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. On the uniqueness of attentional capture by uninformative gaze cues: facilitation interacts with the Simon effect and is rarely followed by IOR.
    McKee D; Christie J; Klein R
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2007 Dec; 61(4):293-303. PubMed ID: 18266505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Perceptual load affects spatial and nonspatial visual selection processes: an event-related brain potential study.
    Barnhardt J; Ritter W; Gomes H
    Neuropsychologia; 2008; 46(7):2071-8. PubMed ID: 18355882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.