BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

551 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18315411)

  • 21. Automatic processing of word meaning: intralingual and interlingual interference.
    Goodman GS; Haith MM; Guttentag RE; Rao S
    Child Dev; 1985 Feb; 56(1):103-18. PubMed ID: 3987396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Investigating the interplay between semantic and phonological distractor effects in picture naming.
    Melinger A; Abdel Rahman R
    Brain Lang; 2004; 90(1-3):213-20. PubMed ID: 15172539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The word frequency effect in picture naming: contrasting two hypotheses using homonym pictures.
    Shatzman KB; Schiller NO
    Brain Lang; 2004; 90(1-3):160-9. PubMed ID: 15172534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Phonological neighbors influence word naming through the least supported phoneme.
    Yates M; Friend J; Ploetz DM
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Dec; 34(6):1599-608. PubMed ID: 19045995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The activation of embedded words in spoken word identification is robust but constrained: evidence from the picture-word interference paradigm.
    Bowers JS; Davis CJ; Mattys SL; Damian MF; Hanley D
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Oct; 35(5):1585-97. PubMed ID: 19803658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The visual-auditory color-word stroop asymmetry and its time course.
    Roelofs A
    Mem Cognit; 2005 Dec; 33(8):1325-36. PubMed ID: 16615380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Which words are activated during bilingual word production?
    Colomé A; Miozzo M
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Jan; 36(1):96-109. PubMed ID: 20053047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The distractor frequency effect in picture-word interference: Evidence for response exclusion.
    Dhooge E; Hartsuiker RJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Jul; 36(4):878-91. PubMed ID: 20565207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Is there semantic interference in delayed naming?
    Mädebach A; Oppermann F; Hantsch A; Curda C; Jescheniak JD
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Mar; 37(2):522-38. PubMed ID: 21299323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Semantic relatedness among objects promotes the activation of multiple phonological codes during object naming.
    Oppermann F; Jescheniak JD; Schriefers H; Gorges F
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 Feb; 63(2):356-70. PubMed ID: 19557668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Concurrent processing of words and their replacements during speech.
    Hartsuiker RJ; Catchpole CM; de Jong NH; Pickering MJ
    Cognition; 2008 Sep; 108(3):601-7. PubMed ID: 18547556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Activation of the phonological lexicon for reading and object naming in deep dyslexia.
    Katz RB; Lanzoni SM
    Brain Lang; 1997 Jun; 58(1):46-60. PubMed ID: 9184094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Task effects on eye movements during reading.
    Kaakinen JK; Hyönä J
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Nov; 36(6):1561-6. PubMed ID: 20854008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. When bees hamper the production of honey: lexical interference from associates in speech production.
    Abdel Rahman R; Melinger A
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 May; 33(3):604-14. PubMed ID: 17470008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Teaching adults new words: the role of practice and consolidation.
    Clay F; Bowers JS; Davis CJ; Hanley DA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 Sep; 33(5):970-6. PubMed ID: 17723073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Word semantics is processed even without attentional effort.
    Relander K; Rämä P; Kujala T
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Aug; 21(8):1511-22. PubMed ID: 18823236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Locus of semantic interference in picture-word interference tasks.
    Damian MF; Bowers JS
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2003 Mar; 10(1):111-7. PubMed ID: 12747497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. How strongly do word reading times and lexical decision times correlate? Combining data from eye movement corpora and megastudies.
    Kuperman V; Drieghe D; Keuleers E; Brysbaert M
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2013; 66(3):563-80. PubMed ID: 22524868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Attention, exposure duration, and gaze shifting in naming performance.
    Roelofs A
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2011 Jun; 37(3):860-73. PubMed ID: 21480746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The gender congruency effect and the selection of freestanding and bound morphemes: evidence from croatian.
    Costa A; Kovacic D; Fedorenko E; Caramazza A
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2003 Nov; 29(6):1270-82. PubMed ID: 14622060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 28.