These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

248 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18316505)

  • 1. Digital enhancement of radiographs for assessment of interproximal dental caries.
    Seneadza V; Koob A; Kaltschmitt J; Staehle HJ; Duwenhoegger J; Eickholz P
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2008 Mar; 37(3):142-8. PubMed ID: 18316505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reliability of digital radiography of interproximal dental caries.
    Sanden E; Koob A; Hassfeld S; Staehle HJ; Eickholz P
    Am J Dent; 2003 Jun; 16(3):170-6. PubMed ID: 12967070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of digital filtering on the measurement of the depth of proximal caries under different exposure conditions.
    Koob A; Sanden E; Hassfeld S; Staehle HJ; Eickholz P
    Am J Dent; 2004 Dec; 17(6):388-93. PubMed ID: 15724747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Histologic and radiographic assessment of caries-like lesions localized at the crown margin.
    Zoellner A; Diemer B; Weber HP; Stassinakis A; Gaengler P
    J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Jul; 88(1):54-9. PubMed ID: 12239481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Digital radiography of interproximal caries: effect of different filters.
    Eickholz P; Kolb I; Lenhard M; Hassfeld S; Staehle H
    Caries Res; 1999; 33(3):234-41. PubMed ID: 10207200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of the automatic exposure compensation on the proximal caries diagnosis.
    Yoshiura K; Nakayama E; Shimizu M; Goto TK; Chikui T; Kawazu T; Okamura K
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2005 May; 34(3):140-4. PubMed ID: 15897283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Diagnostic accuracy of two software modalities for detection of caries lesions in digital radiographs from four dental systems.
    Hintze H
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2006 Mar; 35(2):78-82. PubMed ID: 16549433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Approximal caries depth assessment with storage phosphor versus film radiography. Evaluation of the caries-specific Oslo enhancement procedure.
    Svanaes DB; Moystad A; Larheim TA
    Caries Res; 2000; 34(6):448-53. PubMed ID: 11093017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Accuracy of caries detection with four storage phosphor systems and E-speed radiographs.
    Hintze H; Wenzel A; Frydenberg M
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2002 May; 31(3):170-5. PubMed ID: 12058264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Detection of approximal caries in digital radiographs before and after correction for attenuation and visual response. An in vitro study.
    Li G; Yoshiura K; Welander U; Shi XQ; McDavid WD
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2002 Mar; 31(2):113-6. PubMed ID: 12076051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An in-vitro evaluation of Kodak Insight and Ektaspeed Plus film with a CMOS detector for natural proximal caries: ROC analysis.
    Nair MK; Nair UP
    Caries Res; 2001; 35(5):354-9. PubMed ID: 11641571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of clinician agreement during visualization of conventional and digitized bitewing radiographs.
    Kimmes NS; Saini TS; Carroll LR
    Gen Dent; 2006; 54(3):182-5. PubMed ID: 16776410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Influence of displayed image size on radiographic detection of approximal caries.
    Haak R; Wicht MJ; Nowak G; Hellmich M
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2003 Jul; 32(4):242-6. PubMed ID: 13679355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The correlation of DIFOTI to clinical and radiographic images in Class II carious lesions.
    Bin-Shuwaish M; Yaman P; Dennison J; Neiva G
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2008 Oct; 139(10):1374-81. PubMed ID: 18832273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Interproximal caries detection: how good are we?
    Dykstra B
    Dent Today; 2008 Apr; 27(4):144, 146-7. PubMed ID: 18497209
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Scanning resolution and the detection of approximal caries.
    Janhom A; van Ginkel FC; van Amerongen JP; van der Stelt PF
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2001 May; 30(3):166-71. PubMed ID: 11420630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Detection of cavitated or non-cavitated approximal enamel caries lesions using CMOS and CCD digital X-ray sensors and conventional D and F-speed films at different exposure conditions.
    Bottenberg P; Jacquet W; Stachniss V; Wellnitz J; Schulte AG
    Am J Dent; 2011 Apr; 24(2):74-8. PubMed ID: 21698985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Digital enhancement of radiographs: can it improve caries diagnosis?
    Shrout MK; Russell CM; Potter BJ; Powell BJ; Hildebolt CF
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1996 Apr; 127(4):469-73. PubMed ID: 8655867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Reliability of Logicon caries detector in the detection and depth assessment of dental caries: an in-vitro study.
    Behere RR; Lele SM
    Indian J Dent Res; 2011; 22(2):362. PubMed ID: 21891917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of standard and task-specific enhancement of Digora storage phosphor images for approximal caries diagnosis.
    Møystad A; Svanaes DB; van der Stelt PF; Gröndahl HG; Wenzel A; van Ginkel FC; Kullendorff B; Hintze H; Larheim TA
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2003 Nov; 32(6):390-6. PubMed ID: 15070842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.