These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

97 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18316748)

  • 41. Mammographic density and estimation of breast cancer risk in intermediate risk population.
    Tesic V; Kolaric B; Znaor A; Kuna SK; Brkljacic B
    Breast J; 2013; 19(1):71-8. PubMed ID: 23173778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Mammography in younger women: the dilemma of diminishing returns.
    Calonge N
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2010 May; 102(10):668-9. PubMed ID: 20439837
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Recent findings may inform breast density notification laws.
    Trubo R
    JAMA; 2015 Feb; 313(5):452-3. PubMed ID: 25647190
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Longitudinal trends in mammographic percent density and breast cancer risk.
    Vachon CM; Pankratz VS; Scott CG; Maloney SD; Ghosh K; Brandt KR; Milanese T; Carston MJ; Sellers TA
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2007 May; 16(5):921-8. PubMed ID: 17507617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Mammography in symptomatic and asymptomatic patients.
    Stomper PC; Gelman RS
    Hematol Oncol Clin North Am; 1989 Dec; 3(4):611-40. PubMed ID: 2691492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Summaries for patients. Relationship of mammography use to size and stage of breast cancer at diagnosis in older women.
    Ann Intern Med; 2002 Nov; 137(10):I33. PubMed ID: 12435236
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Breast cancer incidence, 1980-2006: combined roles of menopausal hormone therapy, screening mammography, and estrogen receptor status.
    Glass AG; Lacey JV; Carreon JD; Hoover RN
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2007 Aug; 99(15):1152-61. PubMed ID: 17652280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. American College of Radiology guidelines for breast cancer screening.
    Feig SA; D'Orsi CJ; Hendrick RE; Jackson VP; Kopans DB; Monsees B; Sickles EA; Stelling CB; Zinninger M; Wilcox-Buchalla P
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1998 Jul; 171(1):29-33. PubMed ID: 9648758
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. The recent decline in mammography rates is limited to low- to average-risk women.
    Slomiany BA; McMasters KM; Chagpar AB
    Am J Surg; 2008 Dec; 196(6):821-6; discussion 826. PubMed ID: 19095095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Understanding breast cancer risk.
    Anderson RL
    Radiol Technol; 2010; 81(5):457M-476M. PubMed ID: 20445140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Are mammography recommendations in women younger than 40 related to increased risk?
    Kapp JM; Yankaskas BC; LeFevre ML
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2010 Jan; 119(2):485-90. PubMed ID: 19148745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Mammography screening: after the storm, calls for more personalized approaches.
    Peres J
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2010 Jan; 102(1):9-11. PubMed ID: 20023204
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Harms of screening mammography for breast cancer in Japanese women.
    Kasahara Y; Kawai M; Tsuji I; Tohno E; Yokoe T; Irahara M; Tangoku A; Ohuchi N
    Breast Cancer; 2013 Oct; 20(4):310-5. PubMed ID: 22282164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Association of childhood and adolescent anthropometric factors, physical activity, and diet with adult mammographic breast density.
    Sellers TA; Vachon CM; Pankratz VS; Janney CA; Fredericksen Z; Brandt KR; Huang Y; Couch FJ; Kushi LH; Cerhan JR
    Am J Epidemiol; 2007 Aug; 166(4):456-64. PubMed ID: 17548785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Breast cancer decline mirrors fall in hormone use, spurs both debate and research.
    McNeil C
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2007 Feb; 99(4):266-7. PubMed ID: 17312300
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. What's new in breast cancer? Part I.
    Fabrizio T
    Nord Med; 1992; 107(12):319-20, 325. PubMed ID: 1465348
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Mammography benefits appear to have no age limit.
    Mayo Clin Womens Healthsource; 2008 Nov; 12(11):3. PubMed ID: 18836394
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Re: Performance of first mammography examination in women younger than 40 years.
    Eisinger F
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2010 Nov; 102(22):1742; author reply 1742, 1742-3. PubMed ID: 20966429
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. The prominent duct pattern as an indicator of cancer risk.
    Wolfe JN
    Oncology; 1969; 23(2):149-58. PubMed ID: 5787935
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Mammography surveillance following breast cancer.
    Geller BM; Kerlikowske K; Carney PA; Abraham LA; Yankaskas BC; Taplin SH; Ballard-Barbash R; Dignan MB; Rosenberg R; Urban N; Barlow WE
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2003 Sep; 81(2):107-15. PubMed ID: 14572153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.