These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

253 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18316817)

  • 1. Using clickers in nonmajors- and majors-level biology courses: student opinion, learning, and long-term retention of course material.
    Crossgrove K; Curran KL
    CBE Life Sci Educ; 2008; 7(1):146-54. PubMed ID: 18316817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Different but equal? How nonmajors and majors approach and learn genetics.
    Knight JK; Smith MK
    CBE Life Sci Educ; 2010; 9(1):34-44. PubMed ID: 20194806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The benefits of using clickers in small-enrollment seminar-style biology courses.
    Smith MK; Trujillo C; Su TT
    CBE Life Sci Educ; 2011; 10(1):14-7. PubMed ID: 21364096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Active learning and student-centered pedagogy improve student attitudes and performance in introductory biology.
    Armbruster P; Patel M; Johnson E; Weiss M
    CBE Life Sci Educ; 2009; 8(3):203-13. PubMed ID: 19723815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Using clickers to improve student engagement and performance in an introductory biochemistry class.
    Addison S; Wright A; Milner R
    Biochem Mol Biol Educ; 2009 Mar; 37(2):84-91. PubMed ID: 21567711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Technology support in nursing education: clickers in the classroom.
    Berry J
    Nurs Educ Perspect; 2009; 30(5):295-8. PubMed ID: 19824239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Peer learning and support of technology in an undergraduate biology course to enhance deep learning.
    Tsaushu M; Tal T; Sagy O; Kali Y; Gepstein S; Zilberstein D
    CBE Life Sci Educ; 2012; 11(4):402-12. PubMed ID: 23222836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The retention benefits of cumulative versus non-cumulative midterms in introductory biology may depend on students' reasoning skills.
    Bailey EG; Greenall RF; Tullis MM; Williams KR
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(4):e0250143. PubMed ID: 33886630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Assessment of the effects of student response systems on student learning and attitudes over a broad range of biology courses.
    Preszler RW; Dawe A; Shuster CB; Shuster M
    CBE Life Sci Educ; 2007; 6(1):29-41. PubMed ID: 17339392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A Call to Develop Course-Based Undergraduate Research Experiences (CUREs) for Nonmajors Courses.
    Ballen CJ; Blum JE; Brownell S; Hebert S; Hewlett J; Klein JR; McDonald EA; Monti DL; Nold SC; Slemmons KE; Soneral PAG; Cotner S
    CBE Life Sci Educ; 2017; 16(2):. PubMed ID: 28450449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Does displaying the class results affect student discussion during peer instruction?
    Perez KE; Strauss EA; Downey N; Galbraith A; Jeanne R; Cooper S
    CBE Life Sci Educ; 2010; 9(2):133-40. PubMed ID: 20516358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Combining peer discussion with instructor explanation increases student learning from in-class concept questions.
    Smith MK; Wood WB; Krauter K; Knight JK
    CBE Life Sci Educ; 2011; 10(1):55-63. PubMed ID: 21364100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Prescribed active learning increases performance in introductory biology.
    Freeman S; O'Connor E; Parks JW; Cunningham M; Hurley D; Haak D; Dirks C; Wenderoth MP
    CBE Life Sci Educ; 2007; 6(2):132-9. PubMed ID: 17548875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Acceptance of clickers in a large multimodal biochemistry class as determined by student evaluations of teaching: Are they just an annoying distraction for distance students?
    Miles NG; Soares da Costa TP
    Biochem Mol Biol Educ; 2016; 44(1):99-108. PubMed ID: 26515808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Assessment of Biology Majors' Versus Nonmajors' Views on Evolution, Creationism, and Intelligent Design.
    Paz-Y-Miño C G; Espinosa A
    Evolution (N Y); 2009 Mar; 2(1):75-83. PubMed ID: 26973732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Ripped from the Headlines: Using Current Events and Deliberative Democracy to Improve Student Performance in and Perceptions of Nonmajors Biology Courses.
    Tinsley HN
    J Microbiol Biol Educ; 2016 Dec; 17(3):380-388. PubMed ID: 28101264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Student evaluation of clickers in a combined dental and dental hygiene periodontology course.
    Satheesh KM; Saylor-Boles CD; Rapley JW; Liu Y; Gadbury-Amyot CC
    J Dent Educ; 2013 Oct; 77(10):1321-9. PubMed ID: 24098036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Increased course structure improves performance in introductory biology.
    Freeman S; Haak D; Wenderoth MP
    CBE Life Sci Educ; 2011; 10(2):175-86. PubMed ID: 21633066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The Genetics Concept Assessment: a new concept inventory for gauging student understanding of genetics.
    Smith MK; Wood WB; Knight JK
    CBE Life Sci Educ; 2008; 7(4):422-30. PubMed ID: 19047428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The Effect of a Paired Lab on Course Completion and Grades in Nonmajors Introductory Biology.
    DeFeo DJ; Bibler A; Gerken S
    CBE Life Sci Educ; 2020 Sep; 19(3):ar36. PubMed ID: 32822278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.