144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18317190)
1. What is the correlation of in vivo wear and damage patterns with in vitro TDR motion response?
Kurtz SM; Patwardhan A; MacDonald D; Ciccarelli L; van Ooij A; Lorenz M; Zindrick M; O'Leary P; Isaza J; Ross R
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Mar; 33(5):481-9. PubMed ID: 18317190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Response of Charité total disc replacement under physiologic loads: prosthesis component motion patterns.
O'Leary P; Nicolakis M; Lorenz MA; Voronov LI; Zindrick MR; Ghanayem A; Havey RM; Carandang G; Sartori M; Gaitanis IN; Fronczak S; Patwardhan AG
Spine J; 2005; 5(6):590-9. PubMed ID: 16291097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Polyethylene wear and rim fracture in total disc arthroplasty.
Kurtz SM; van Ooij A; Ross R; de Waal Malefijt J; Peloza J; Ciccarelli L; Villarraga ML
Spine J; 2007; 7(1):12-21. PubMed ID: 17197327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The natural history of polyethylene oxidation in total disc replacement.
Kurtz SM; MacDonald D; Ianuzzi A; van Ooij A; Isaza J; Ross ER; Regan J
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Oct; 34(22):2369-77. PubMed ID: 19789469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. UHMWPE wear debris and tissue reactions are reduced for contemporary designs of lumbar total disc replacements.
Veruva SY; Lanman TH; Isaza JE; MacDonald DW; Kurtz SM; Steinbeck MJ
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Mar; 473(3):987-98. PubMed ID: 25367112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Development of a clinically relevant impingement test method for a mobile bearing lumbar total disc replacement.
Siskey R; Peck J; Mehta H; Kosydar A; Kurtz S; Hill G
Spine J; 2016 Sep; 16(9):1133-42. PubMed ID: 27179625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. In vivo functional performance of failed Prodisc-L devices: retrieval analysis of lumbar total disc replacements.
Lebl DR; Cammisa FP; Girardi FP; Wright T; Abjornson C
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 Sep; 37(19):E1209-17. PubMed ID: 22531474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Polyethylene wear debris and long-term clinical failure of the Charité disc prosthesis: a study of 4 patients.
van Ooij A; Kurtz SM; Stessels F; Noten H; van Rhijn L
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Jan; 32(2):223-9. PubMed ID: 17224818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Fluoroscopic assessment of lumbar total disc replacement kinematics during walking.
Barrett RS; Lichtwark GA; Armstrong C; Barber L; Scott-Young M; Hall RM
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2015 Apr; 40(7):436-42. PubMed ID: 25599285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A prospective, randomized, multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption study of lumbar total disc replacement with the CHARITE artificial disc versus lumbar fusion: part II: evaluation of radiographic outcomes and correlation of surgical technique accuracy with clinical outcomes.
McAfee PC; Cunningham B; Holsapple G; Adams K; Blumenthal S; Guyer RD; Dmietriev A; Maxwell JH; Regan JJ; Isaza J
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2005 Jul; 30(14):1576-83; discussion E388-90. PubMed ID: 16025025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Basic principles of successful implantation of the SB Charité model LINK intervertebral disk endoprosthesis].
Büttner-Janz K; Hahn S; Schikora K; Link HD
Orthopade; 2002 May; 31(5):441-53. PubMed ID: 12089793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Biomechanical analysis of rotational motions after disc arthroplasty: implications for patients with adult deformities.
McAfee PC; Cunningham BW; Hayes V; Sidiqi F; Dabbah M; Sefter JC; Hu N; Beatson H
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Sep; 31(19 Suppl):S152-60. PubMed ID: 16946633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The effect of anterior-posterior shear on the wear of CHARITÉ total disc replacement.
Vicars R; Prokopovich P; Brown TD; Tipper JL; Ingham E; Fisher J; Hall RM
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 Apr; 37(9):E528-34. PubMed ID: 22037530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Analysis of a retrieved polyethylene total disc replacement component.
Kurtz SM; Peloza J; Siskey R; Villarraga ML
Spine J; 2005; 5(3):344-50. PubMed ID: 15863092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Posterior component impingement after lumbar total disc replacement: a radiographic analysis of 66 ProDisc-L prostheses in 56 patients.
Käfer W; Clessienne CB; Däxle M; Kocak T; Reichel H; Cakir B
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Oct; 33(22):2444-9. PubMed ID: 18923322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Total lumbar disc replacement: different results for different levels.
Siepe CJ; Mayer HM; Heinz-Leisenheimer M; Korge A
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Apr; 32(7):782-90. PubMed ID: 17414914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effects of charité artificial disc on the implanted and adjacent spinal segments mechanics using a hybrid testing protocol.
Goel VK; Grauer JN; Patel TCh; Biyani A; Sairyo K; Vishnubhotla S; Matyas A; Cowgill I; Shaw M; Long R; Dick D; Panjabi MM; Serhan H
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2005 Dec; 30(24):2755-64. PubMed ID: 16371899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Significance of angular mismatch between vertebral endplate and prosthetic endplate in lumbar total disc replacement.
Lee CS; Chung SS; Oh SK; You JW
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2011 May; 24(3):183-8. PubMed ID: 20844454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect of spacer diameter of the Dynesys dynamic stabilization system on the biomechanics of the lumbar spine: a finite element analysis.
Shih SL; Chen CS; Lin HM; Huang LY; Liu CL; Huang CH; Cheng CK
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2012 Jul; 25(5):E140-9. PubMed ID: 22744611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Biomechanical evaluation of the kinematics of the cadaver lumbar spine following disc replacement with the ProDisc-L prosthesis.
Demetropoulos CK; Sengupta DK; Knaub MA; Wiater BP; Abjornson C; Truumees E; Herkowitz HN
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 Jan; 35(1):26-31. PubMed ID: 20042953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
