144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18317190)
21. Insertion of the artificial disc replacement: a cadaver study comparing the conventional surgical technique and the use of a navigation system.
Rauschmann MA; Thalgott J; Fogarty M; Nichlos M; Kleinszig G; Knap M; Kafchitsas K
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 May; 34(10):1110-5. PubMed ID: 19404182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Kinematic and fatigue biomechanics of an interpositional facet arthroplasty device.
Dahl MC; Freeman AL
Spine J; 2016 Apr; 16(4):531-9. PubMed ID: 26620944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Biomechanical evaluation of total disc replacement arthroplasty: an in vitro human cadaveric model.
Cunningham BW; Gordon JD; Dmitriev AE; Hu N; McAfee PC
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Oct; 28(20):S110-7. PubMed ID: 14560182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Periprosthetic UHMWPE Wear Debris Induces Inflammation, Vascularization, and Innervation After Total Disc Replacement in the Lumbar Spine.
Veruva SY; Lanman TH; Isaza JE; Freeman TA; Kurtz SM; Steinbeck MJ
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2017 May; 475(5):1369-1381. PubMed ID: 27488379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Porous coated motion cervical disc replacement: a biomechanical, histomorphometric, and biologic wear analysis in a caprine model.
Hu N; Cunningham BW; McAfee PC; Kim SW; Sefter JC; Cappuccino A; Pimenta L
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Jul; 31(15):1666-73. PubMed ID: 16816760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Biomechanical comparison of lumbar total disc arthroplasty, discectomy, and fusion: effect on adjacent-level disc pressure and facet joint force.
Gao SG; Lei GH; He HB; Liu H; Xiao WF; Wen T; Liang JY; Li KH
J Neurosurg Spine; 2011 Nov; 15(5):507-14. PubMed ID: 21780862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Are PEEK-on-Ceramic Bearings an Option for Total Disc Arthroplasty? An In Vitro Tribology Study.
Siskey R; Ciccarelli L; Lui MK; Kurtz SM
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Nov; 474(11):2428-2440. PubMed ID: 27677290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: the effect of various instrumentation techniques on the flexibility of the lumbar spine.
Harris BM; Hilibrand AS; Savas PE; Pellegrino A; Vaccaro AR; Siegler S; Albert TJ
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2004 Feb; 29(4):E65-70. PubMed ID: 15094547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Evaluation of spinal kinematics following lumbar total disc replacement and circumferential fusion using in vivo fluoroscopy.
Auerbach JD; Wills BP; McIntosh TC; Balderston RA
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Mar; 32(5):527-36. PubMed ID: 17334286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. In situ contact analysis of the prosthesis components of Prodisc-L in lumbar spine following total disc replacement.
Chen WM; Park C; Lee K; Lee S
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Sep; 34(20):E716-23. PubMed ID: 19752690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Biomechanical effect of constraint in lumbar total disc replacement: a study with finite element analysis.
Chung SK; Kim YE; Wang KC
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 May; 34(12):1281-6. PubMed ID: 19455003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Severe impingement of lumbar disc replacements increases the functional biological activity of polyethylene wear debris.
Baxter RM; Macdonald DW; Kurtz SM; Steinbeck MJ
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2013 Jun; 95(11):e751-9. PubMed ID: 23780545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Biomechanical comparison of a two-level Maverick disc replacement with a hybrid one-level disc replacement and one-level anterior lumbar interbody fusion.
Erkan S; Rivera Y; Wu C; Mehbod AA; Transfeldt EE
Spine J; 2009 Oct; 9(10):830-5. PubMed ID: 19477692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Biomechanical studies of an artificial disc implant in the human cadaveric spine.
Hitchon PW; Eichholz K; Barry C; Rubenbauer P; Ingalhalikar A; Nakamura S; Follett K; Lim TH; Torner J
J Neurosurg Spine; 2005 Mar; 2(3):339-43. PubMed ID: 15796360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Adjacent segment mobility after rigid and semirigid instrumentation of the lumbar spine.
Cakir B; Carazzo C; Schmidt R; Mattes T; Reichel H; Käfer W
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 May; 34(12):1287-91. PubMed ID: 19455004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Prospective, randomized, multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption study of lumbar total disc replacement with the CHARITE artificial disc versus lumbar fusion: five-year follow-up.
Guyer RD; McAfee PC; Banco RJ; Bitan FD; Cappuccino A; Geisler FH; Hochschuler SH; Holt RT; Jenis LG; Majd ME; Regan JJ; Tromanhauser SG; Wong DC; Blumenthal SL
Spine J; 2009 May; 9(5):374-86. PubMed ID: 18805066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Stability of the whole lumbar spine after multilevel fenestration and discectomy.
Lu WW; Luk KD; Ruan DK; Fei ZQ; Leong JC
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1999 Jul; 24(13):1277-82. PubMed ID: 10404567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Asymmetric motion distribution between components of a mobile-core lumbar disc prosthesis: an explanation of unequal wear distribution in explanted CHARITÉ polyethylene cores.
Patwardhan AG; Havey RM; Wharton ND; Tsitsopoulos PP; Newman P; Carandang G; Voronov LI
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2012 May; 94(9):846-54. PubMed ID: 22552675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Development of a novel in vitro cadaveric model for analysis of biomechanics and surgical treatment of Bertolotti syndrome.
Golubovsky JL; Colbrunn RW; Klatte RS; Nagle TF; Briskin IN; Chakravarthy VB; Gillespie CM; Reith JD; Jasty N; Benzel EC; Steinmetz MP
Spine J; 2020 Apr; 20(4):638-656. PubMed ID: 31669612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. [State of the art of lumbar intervertebral disc replacement].
Zarghooni K; Siewe J; Eysel P
Orthopade; 2011 Feb; 40(2):141-7. PubMed ID: 21301808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
