455 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18317196)
1. Long-term outcomes of two different decompressive techniques for lumbar spinal stenosis.
Fu YS; Zeng BF; Xu JG
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Mar; 33(5):514-8. PubMed ID: 18317196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Long-term results of microsurgical treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis by unilateral laminotomy for bilateral decompression.
Oertel MF; Ryang YM; Korinth MC; Gilsbach JM; Rohde V
Neurosurgery; 2006 Dec; 59(6):1264-9; discussion 1269-70. PubMed ID: 17277689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Five-year outcomes of surgical treatment for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: a prospective observational study of symptom severity at standard intervals after surgery.
Yamashita K; Ohzono K; Hiroshima K
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Jun; 31(13):1484-90. PubMed ID: 16741459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Midterm outcome after microendoscopic decompressive laminotomy for lumbar spinal stenosis: 4-year prospective study.
Castro-Menéndez M; Bravo-Ricoy JA; Casal-Moro R; Hernández-Blanco M; Jorge-Barreiro FJ
Neurosurgery; 2009 Jul; 65(1):100-10; discussion 110; quiz A12. PubMed ID: 19574831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Bilateral "over the top" decompression through unilateral laminotomy for lumbar and thoracic spinal canal stenosis].
Banczerowski P; Lipóth L; Veres R
Ideggyogy Sz; 2007 Nov; 60(11-12):467-73. PubMed ID: 18198793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Muscle-preserving interlaminar decompression for the lumbar spine: a minimally invasive new procedure for lumbar spinal canal stenosis.
Hatta Y; Shiraishi T; Sakamoto A; Yato Y; Harada T; Mikami Y; Hase H; Kubo T
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Apr; 34(8):E276-80. PubMed ID: 19365236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Aperius interspinous implant versus open surgical decompression in lumbar spinal stenosis.
Postacchini R; Ferrari E; Cinotti G; Menchetti PP; Postacchini F
Spine J; 2011 Oct; 11(10):933-9. PubMed ID: 22005077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Correlation of patient satisfaction with symptom severity and walking ability after surgical treatment for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis.
Yamashita K; Hayashi J; Ohzono K; Hiroshima K
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Nov; 28(21):2477-81. PubMed ID: 14595167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Complications associated with minimally invasive decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis.
Podichetty VK; Spears J; Isaacs RE; Booher J; Biscup RS
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2006 May; 19(3):161-6. PubMed ID: 16770211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Microscopic laminotomies for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis.
Tsai RY; Yang RS; Bray RS
J Spinal Disord; 1998 Oct; 11(5):389-94. PubMed ID: 9811098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of techniques for decompressive lumbar laminectomy: the minimally invasive versus the "classic" open approach.
Rahman M; Summers LE; Richter B; Mimran RI; Jacob RP
Minim Invasive Neurosurg; 2008 Apr; 51(2):100-5. PubMed ID: 18401823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effectiveness of posterior decompression techniques compared with conventional laminectomy for lumbar stenosis.
Overdevest GM; Jacobs W; Vleggeert-Lankamp C; Thomé C; Gunzburg R; Peul W
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2015 Mar; (3):CD010036. PubMed ID: 25760812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Surgical or nonoperative treatment for lumbar spinal stenosis? A randomized controlled trial.
Malmivaara A; Slätis P; Heliövaara M; Sainio P; Kinnunen H; Kankare J; Dalin-Hirvonen N; Seitsalo S; Herno A; Kortekangas P; Niinimäki T; Rönty H; Tallroth K; Turunen V; Knekt P; Härkänen T; Hurri H;
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Jan; 32(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 17202885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Comparison of instrumented posterior fusion with instrumented circumferential lumbar fusion in the treatment of lumbar stenosis with low degree lumbar spondylolisthesis].
Fei Q; Wang YP; Xu HG; Qiu GX; Weng XS; Lin J; Tian Y; Yu B; Xu R
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2005 Apr; 43(8):486-90. PubMed ID: 15938902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Prospective analysis of surgical outcomes in patients undergoing decompressive laminectomy and posterior instrumentation for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis.
Gelalis ID; Arnaoutoglou C; Christoforou G; Lykissas MG; Batsilas I; Xenakis T
Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc; 2010; 44(3):235-40. PubMed ID: 21088465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Micro-decompression procedure for lumbar spinal stenosis].
Zhang GL; Ge BF; Gong TJ; Wang YH; Chen KM; Qian J
Zhongguo Gu Shang; 2009 Oct; 22(10):751-3. PubMed ID: 19902751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Modified Marmot operation versus spinous process transverse cutting laminectomy for lumbar spinal stenosis.
Kawakami M; Nakao S; Fukui D; Kadosaka Y; Matsuoka T; Yamada H
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Nov; 38(23):E1461-8. PubMed ID: 23778375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Minimally invasive lumbar spinal decompression in the elderly: outcomes of 50 patients aged 75 years and older.
Rosen DS; O'Toole JE; Eichholz KM; Hrubes M; Huo D; Sandhu FA; Fessler RG
Neurosurgery; 2007 Mar; 60(3):503-9; discussion 509-10. PubMed ID: 17327795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Surgical treatment for lumbar spinal stenosis by different methods].
Xu WX; Wang J; Lu D; Wu Z; Zhu WM; Zhang C
Zhongguo Gu Shang; 2009 Oct; 22(10):738-40. PubMed ID: 19902746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Degenerative spondylolisthesis does not affect the outcome of unilateral laminotomy with bilateral decompression in patients with lumbar stenosis.
Chang HS; Fujisawa N; Tsuchiya T; Oya S; Matsui T
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2014 Mar; 39(5):400-8. PubMed ID: 24365897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
