These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1831821)

  • 1. Assimilation and contrast in the phonetic perception of vowels.
    Shigeno S
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1991 Jul; 90(1):103-11. PubMed ID: 1831821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of speaking rate on the perception of vowels.
    Gottfried TL; Miller JL; Payton PE
    Phonetica; 1990; 47(3-4):155-72. PubMed ID: 2151828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Event-related potentials and the categorical perception of speech sounds.
    Maiste AC; Wiens AS; Hunt MJ; Scherg M; Picton TW
    Ear Hear; 1995 Feb; 16(1):68-90. PubMed ID: 7774771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Human adults and human infants show a "perceptual magnet effect" for the prototypes of speech categories, monkeys do not.
    Kuhl PK
    Percept Psychophys; 1991 Aug; 50(2):93-107. PubMed ID: 1945741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Perceptual differences between vowels located in a limited phonetic space.
    Kewley-Port D; Atal BS
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1989 Apr; 85(4):1726-40. PubMed ID: 2708689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of consonantal context on perceptual assimilation of American English vowels by Japanese listeners.
    Strange W; Akahane-Yamada R; Kubo R; Trent SA; Nishi K
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Apr; 109(4):1691-704. PubMed ID: 11325137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Characterizing the influence of native language experience on adult speech perception.
    Polka L
    Percept Psychophys; 1992 Jul; 52(1):37-52. PubMed ID: 1635856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Segregation of concurrent sounds. II: Effects of spectral envelope tracing, frequency modulation coherence, and frequency modulation width.
    Marin CM; McAdams S
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1991 Jan; 89(1):341-51. PubMed ID: 2002173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The contribution of waveform interactions to the perception of concurrent vowels.
    Assmann PF; Summerfield Q
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1994 Jan; 95(1):471-84. PubMed ID: 8120258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Perceptual assimilation and L2 learning: evidence from the perception of Southern British English vowels by native speakers of Greek and Japanese.
    Lengeris A
    Phonetica; 2009; 66(3):169-87. PubMed ID: 19776666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Dynamic information in the identification and discrimination of vowels.
    Fox RA
    Phonetica; 1989; 46(1-3):97-116. PubMed ID: 2608728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. N1 response attenuation and the mismatch negativity (MMN) to within- and across-category phonetic contrasts.
    Silva DM; Melges DB; Rothe-Neves R
    Psychophysiology; 2017 Apr; 54(4):591-600. PubMed ID: 28169421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A possible auditory basis for internal structure of phonetic categories.
    Miller JL; Connine CM; Schermer TM; Kluender KR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1983 Jun; 73(6):2124-33. PubMed ID: 6875098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The phonetic manifestation of French /s#∫/ and /∫#s/ sequences in different vowel contexts: on the occurrence and the domain of sibilant assimilation.
    Niebuhr O; Meunier C
    Phonetica; 2011; 68(3):133-60. PubMed ID: 22143148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of spectral enhancement in hearing aids, combined with phonemic compression.
    Franck BA; van Kreveld-Bos CS; Dreschler WA; Verschuure H
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1999 Sep; 106(3 Pt 1):1452-64. PubMed ID: 10489703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Spectral and duration properties of front vowels as cues to final stop-consonant voicing.
    Fischer RM; Ohde RN
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1990 Sep; 88(3):1250-9. PubMed ID: 2229662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Speech perception by budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus): spoken vowels.
    Dooling RJ; Brown SD
    Percept Psychophys; 1990 Jun; 47(6):568-74. PubMed ID: 2367177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Processing steps in perception of speech sounds].
    Kiener S
    Z Exp Angew Psychol; 1992; 39(2):194-215. PubMed ID: 1413917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Context independence and phonetic mediation in categorical perception.
    Healy AF; Repp BH
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1982 Feb; 8(1):68-80. PubMed ID: 6460086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Perceptual normalization for speaking rate: effects of temporal distance.
    Newman RS; Sawusch JR
    Percept Psychophys; 1996 May; 58(4):540-60. PubMed ID: 8934686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.