These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. Perception of pitch location within a speaker's F0 range. Honorof DN; Whalen DH J Acoust Soc Am; 2005 Apr; 117(4 Pt 1):2193-200. PubMed ID: 15898660 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cross-language differences in how voice quality and Yanushevskaya I; Gobl C; Ní Chasaide A J Acoust Soc Am; 2018 Nov; 144(5):2730. PubMed ID: 30522326 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Objective speech quality assessment and the RPE-LTP coding algorithm in different noise and language conditions. Hansen JH; Nandkumar S J Acoust Soc Am; 1995 Jan; 97(1):609-27. PubMed ID: 7860837 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. An adaptive method for tracking voicing irregularities. Qi Y; Shipp T J Acoust Soc Am; 1992 Jun; 91(6):3471-7. PubMed ID: 1535639 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [The voice as an anthropologic marker system, its constitutional correlates and characteristics]. Hertrich I; Ziegelmayer G Anthropol Anz; 1988 Jun; 46(2):185-93. PubMed ID: 3408250 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Formation of the actor's/speaker's formant: a study applying spectrum analysis and computer modeling. Leino T; Laukkanen AM; Radolf V J Voice; 2011 Mar; 25(2):150-8. PubMed ID: 20456915 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Perceptual tests of rhythmic similarity: I. Mora rhythm. Murty L; Otake T; Cutler A Lang Speech; 2007; 50(Pt 1):77-99. PubMed ID: 17518104 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Speech synthesis by glottal excited linear prediction. Childers DG; Hu HT J Acoust Soc Am; 1994 Oct; 96(4):2026-36. PubMed ID: 7963019 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Investigation of objective measures for intelligibility prediction of noise-reduced speech for Chinese, Japanese, and English. Li J; Xia R; Ying D; Yan Y; Akagi M J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Dec; 136(6):3301. PubMed ID: 25480075 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The Impact of Language on Voice: An LTAS Study. Bahmanbiglu SA; Mojiri F; Abnavi F J Voice; 2017 Mar; 31(2):249.e9-249.e12. PubMed ID: 27692724 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The effects of experimental variables on the perception of American English /r/ and /l/ by Japanese listeners. Yamada RA; Tohkura Y Percept Psychophys; 1992 Oct; 52(4):376-92. PubMed ID: 1437471 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Noise and a Speaker's Impaired Voice Quality Disrupt Spoken Language Processing in School-Aged Children: Evidence From Performance and Response Time Measures. Schiller IS; Morsomme D; Kob M; Remacle A J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2020 Jul; 63(7):2115-2131. PubMed ID: 32569506 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Perception of intelligibility and qualities of non-native accented speakers. Fuse A; Navichkova Y; Alloggio K J Commun Disord; 2018; 71():37-51. PubMed ID: 29268109 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Language, context, and speaker effects in the identification and discrimination of English /r/ and /l/ by Japanese and Korean listeners. Ingram JC; Park SG J Acoust Soc Am; 1998 Feb; 103(2):1161-74. PubMed ID: 9479769 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evidence for language transfer leading to a perceptual advantage for non-native listeners. Chang CB; Mishler A J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Oct; 132(4):2700-10. PubMed ID: 23039462 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Gender recognition from speech. Part II: Fine analysis. Childers DG; Wu K J Acoust Soc Am; 1991 Oct; 90(4 Pt 1):1841-56. PubMed ID: 1755877 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Experience with a second language affects the use of fundamental frequency in speech segmentation. Tremblay A; Namjoshi J; Spinelli E; Broersma M; Cho T; Kim S; Martínez-García MT; Connell K PLoS One; 2017; 12(7):e0181709. PubMed ID: 28738093 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]