311 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18318406)
1. Biased lineup instructions and face identification from video images.
Thompson WB; Johnson J
J Gen Psychol; 2008 Jan; 135(1):23-36. PubMed ID: 18318406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Multiple confidence estimates as indices of eyewitness memory.
Sauer JD; Brewer N; Weber N
J Exp Psychol Gen; 2008 Aug; 137(3):528-47. PubMed ID: 18729714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Matching faces to photographs: poor performance in eyewitness memory (without the memory).
Megreya AM; Burton AM
J Exp Psychol Appl; 2008 Dec; 14(4):364-72. PubMed ID: 19102619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cueing confidence in eyewitness identifications: influence of biased lineup instructions and pre-identification memory feedback under varying lineup conditions.
Leippe MR; Eisenstadt D; Rauch SM
Law Hum Behav; 2009 Jun; 33(3):194-212. PubMed ID: 18600436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A re-examination of the effects of biased lineup instructions in eyewitness identification.
Clark SE
Law Hum Behav; 2005 Oct; 29(5):575-604. PubMed ID: 16254744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Lineup administrator influences on eyewitness identification decisions.
Clark SE; Marshall TE; Rosenthal R
J Exp Psychol Appl; 2009 Mar; 15(1):63-75. PubMed ID: 19309217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A re-examination of the effects of biased lineup instructions in eyewitness identification.
Clark SE
Law Hum Behav; 2005 Aug; 29(4):395-424. PubMed ID: 16133947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Children's identification of faces from lineups: the effects of lineup presentation and instructions on accuracy.
Beresford J; Blades M
J Appl Psychol; 2006 Sep; 91(5):1102-13. PubMed ID: 16953771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Instruction bias and lineup presentation moderate the effects of administrator knowledge on eyewitness identification.
Greathouse SM; Kovera MB
Law Hum Behav; 2009 Feb; 33(1):70-82. PubMed ID: 18594956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Retrieval does not always enhance suggestibility: testing can improve witness identification performance.
LaPaglia JA; Chan JC
Law Hum Behav; 2012 Dec; 36(6):478-87. PubMed ID: 23205595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effects of postidentification feedback on eyewitness identification and nonidentification confidence.
Semmler C; Brewer N; Wells GL
J Appl Psychol; 2004 Apr; 89(2):334-46. PubMed ID: 15065979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Matching identities of familiar and unfamiliar faces caught on CCTV images.
Bruce V; Henderson Z; Newman C; Burton AM
J Exp Psychol Appl; 2001 Sep; 7(3):207-18. PubMed ID: 11676099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Fast and confident: postdicting eyewitness identification accuracy in a field study.
Sauerland M; Sporer SL
J Exp Psychol Appl; 2009 Mar; 15(1):46-62. PubMed ID: 19309216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Sequential lineup presentation promotes less-biased criterion setting but does not improve discriminability.
Palmer MA; Brewer N
Law Hum Behav; 2012 Jun; 36(3):247-55. PubMed ID: 22667814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The confidence-accuracy relationship in eyewitness identification: the effects of reflection and disconfirmation on correlation and calibration.
Brewer N; Keast A; Rishworth A
J Exp Psychol Appl; 2002 Mar; 8(1):44-56. PubMed ID: 12009176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Does methodology matter in eyewitness identification research? The effect of live versus video exposure on eyewitness identification accuracy.
Pozzulo JD; Crescini C; Panton T
Int J Law Psychiatry; 2008; 31(5):430-7. PubMed ID: 18790535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The confidence-accuracy relationship in eyewitness identification: effects of lineup instructions, foil similarity, and target-absent base rates.
Brewer N; Wells GL
J Exp Psychol Appl; 2006 Mar; 12(1):11-30. PubMed ID: 16536656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Biased lineups: sequential presentation reduces the problem.
Lindsay RC; Lea JA; Nosworthy GJ; Fulford JA; Hector J; LeVan V; Seabrook C
J Appl Psychol; 1991 Dec; 76(6):796-802. PubMed ID: 1774217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Children's metacognitive judgments in an eyewitness identification task.
Keast A; Brewer N; Wells GL
J Exp Child Psychol; 2007 Aug; 97(4):286-314. PubMed ID: 17512942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Eyewitness accuracy rates in police showup and lineup presentations: a meta-analytic comparison.
Steblay N; Dysart J; Fulero S; Lindsay RC
Law Hum Behav; 2003 Oct; 27(5):523-40. PubMed ID: 14593796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
