These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18318411)

  • 1. Comparing dependent correlations.
    Wilcox RR; Tian T
    J Gen Psychol; 2008 Jan; 135(1):105-12. PubMed ID: 18318411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A Monte Carlo evaluation of tests for comparing dependent correlations.
    Hittner JB; May K; Silver NC
    J Gen Psychol; 2003 Apr; 130(2):149-68. PubMed ID: 12773018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A Monte Carlo study of alternative responses to intraclass correlation in community trials. Is it ever possible to avoid Cornfield's penalties?
    Murray DM; Hannan PJ; Baker WL
    Eval Rev; 1996 Jun; 20(3):313-37. PubMed ID: 10182207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Testing for a deficit in single-case studies: effects of departures from normality.
    Crawford JR; Garthwaite PH; Azzalini A; Howell DC; Laws KR
    Neuropsychologia; 2006; 44(4):666-77. PubMed ID: 16046228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Using analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) with fallible covariates.
    Culpepper SA; Aguinis H
    Psychol Methods; 2011 Jun; 16(2):166-78. PubMed ID: 21517178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. One-sided nonparametric tests for ordinal data.
    Neuhäuser M
    Percept Mot Skills; 2005 Oct; 101(2):510-4. PubMed ID: 16383087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A Monte Carlo simulation study comparing linear regression, beta regression, variable-dispersion beta regression and fractional logit regression at recovering average difference measures in a two sample design.
    Meaney C; Moineddin R
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2014 Jan; 14():14. PubMed ID: 24461057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. More Voodoo correlations: when average-based measures inflate correlations.
    Brand A; Bradley MT
    J Gen Psychol; 2012; 139(4):260-72. PubMed ID: 24837177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Optimum sample size allocation to minimize cost or maximize power for the two-sample trimmed mean test.
    Guo JH; Luh WM
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2009 May; 62(Pt 2):283-98. PubMed ID: 18157920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Type I error rates and power analyses for single-point sensitivity measures.
    Rotello CM; Masson ME; Verde MF
    Percept Psychophys; 2008 Feb; 70(2):389-401. PubMed ID: 18372758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The impact of sample non-normality on ANOVA and alternative methods.
    Lantz B
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2013 May; 66(2):224-44. PubMed ID: 22624658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A comparison of permutation and mixed-model regression methods for the analysis of simulated data in the context of a group-randomized trial.
    Murray DM; Hannan PJ; Pals SP; McCowen RG; Baker WL; Blitstein JL
    Stat Med; 2006 Feb; 25(3):375-88. PubMed ID: 16143991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Testing for robustness in Monte Carlo studies.
    Serlin RC
    Psychol Methods; 2000 Jun; 5(2):230-40. PubMed ID: 10937332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Gauss or Bernoulli? A Monte Carlo comparison of the performance of the linear mixed-model and the logistic mixed-model analyses in simulated community trials with a dichotomous outcome variable at the individual level.
    Hannan PJ; Murray DM
    Eval Rev; 1996 Jun; 20(3):338-52. PubMed ID: 10182208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Accuracy of effect size estimates from published psychological experiments involving multiple trials.
    Brand A; Bradley MT; Best LA; Stoica G
    J Gen Psychol; 2011; 138(4):281-91. PubMed ID: 24836566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparing a single case to a control group - Applying linear mixed effects models to repeated measures data.
    Huber S; Klein E; Moeller K; Willmes K
    Cortex; 2015 Oct; 71():148-59. PubMed ID: 26218619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Accounting for response misclassification and covariate measurement error improves power and reduces bias in epidemiologic studies.
    Cheng D; Branscum AJ; Stamey JD
    Ann Epidemiol; 2010 Jul; 20(7):562-7. PubMed ID: 20538200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparing the accuracy of experimental estimates to guessing: a new perspective on replication and the "Crisis of Confidence" in psychology.
    Davis-Stober CP; Dana J
    Behav Res Methods; 2014 Mar; 46(1):1-14. PubMed ID: 23661222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Residual Normality Assumption and the Estimation of Multiple Membership Random Effects Models.
    Chen J; Leroux AJ
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2018; 53(6):898-913. PubMed ID: 30521398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Hypothesis tests for population heterogeneity in meta-analysis.
    Viechtbauer W
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2007 May; 60(Pt 1):29-60. PubMed ID: 17535578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.