These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18318422)
1. Deprivation level and choice in pigeons: a test of within-trial contrast. Vasconcelos M; Urcuioli PJ Learn Behav; 2008 Feb; 36(1):12-8. PubMed ID: 18318422 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Choice and timing in pigeons under differing levels of food deprivation. Fox AE; Kyonka EG Behav Processes; 2014 Jul; 106():82-90. PubMed ID: 24811449 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Discriminative stimuli that follow the absence of reinforcement are preferred by pigeons over those that follow reinforcement. Friedrich AM; Clement TS; Zentall TR Learn Behav; 2005 Aug; 33(3):337-42. PubMed ID: 16396080 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Failure to replicate the 'work ethic" effect in pigeons. Vasconcelos M; Urcuioli PJ; Lionello-DeNolf KM J Exp Anal Behav; 2007 May; 87(3):383-99. PubMed ID: 17575903 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Failure to obtain value enhancement by within-trial contrast in simultaneous and successive discriminations. Arantes J; Grace RC Learn Behav; 2008 Feb; 36(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 18318421 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Preference for a stimulus that follows a relatively aversive event: contrast or delay reduction? Singer RA; Berry LM; Zentall TR J Exp Anal Behav; 2007 Mar; 87(2):275-85. PubMed ID: 17465316 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Discriminative stimuli that follow a delay have added value for pigeons. DiGian KA; Friedrich AM; Zentall TR Psychon Bull Rev; 2004 Oct; 11(5):889-95. PubMed ID: 15732699 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Pigeons prefer discriminative stimuli independently of the overall probability of reinforcement and of the number of presentations of the conditioned reinforcer. Stagner JP; Laude JR; Zentall TR J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2012 Oct; 38(4):446-52. PubMed ID: 23066982 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Suboptimal choice by pigeons is eliminated when key-pecking behavior is replaced by treadle-pressing. González-Torres R; Flores J; Orduña V Behav Processes; 2020 Sep; 178():104157. PubMed ID: 32497555 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Testing the boundaries of "paradoxical" predictions: Pigeons do disregard bad news. Fortes I; Vasconcelos M; Machado A J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2016 Oct; 42(4):336-346. PubMed ID: 27598063 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Suboptimal Choice in Pigeons: Stimulus Value Predicts Choice over Frequencies. Smith AP; Bailey AR; Chow JJ; Beckmann JS; Zentall TR PLoS One; 2016; 11(7):e0159336. PubMed ID: 27441394 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Rats' preferences in the suboptimal choice procedure: Evaluating the impact of reinforcement probability and conditioned inhibitors. Alba R; Rodríguez W; Martínez M; Orduña V Behav Processes; 2018 Dec; 157():574-582. PubMed ID: 29689334 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Suboptimal choice in pigeons: Choice is primarily based on the value of the conditioned reinforcer rather than overall reinforcement rate. Smith AP; Zentall TR J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2016 Apr; 42(2):212-20. PubMed ID: 26881902 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Post-choice information processing by pigeons. Martin TI; Zentall TR Anim Cogn; 2005 Oct; 8(4):273-8. PubMed ID: 15744507 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Within-trial contrast: pigeons prefer conditioned reinforcers that follow a relatively more rather than a less aversive event. Zentall TR; Singer RA J Exp Anal Behav; 2007 Jul; 88(1):131-49. PubMed ID: 17725056 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Procrastination in the pigeon: Can conditioned reinforcement increase the likelihood of human procrastination? Zentall TR; Case JP; Andrews DM Psychon Bull Rev; 2018 Oct; 25(5):1952-1957. PubMed ID: 29188447 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]