318 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18318624)
1. Visual-haptic cue weighting is independent of modality-specific attention.
Helbig HB; Ernst MO
J Vis; 2008 Jan; 8(1):21.1-16. PubMed ID: 18318624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Visual and haptic influence on perception of stimulus size.
Van Doorn GH; Richardson BL; Wuillemin DB; Symmons MA
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Apr; 72(3):813-22. PubMed ID: 20348585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The effect of visual task difficulty and attentional direction on the detection of acoustic change as indexed by the Mismatch Negativity.
Muller-Gass A; Stelmack RM; Campbell KB
Brain Res; 2006 Mar; 1078(1):112-30. PubMed ID: 16497283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Self-motion leads to mandatory cue fusion across sensory modalities.
Prsa M; Gale S; Blanke O
J Neurophysiol; 2012 Oct; 108(8):2282-91. PubMed ID: 22832567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Audiovisual asynchrony modulates the Colavita visual dominance effect.
Koppen C; Spence C
Brain Res; 2007 Dec; 1186():224-32. PubMed ID: 18005944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Counting visual and tactile events: the effect of attention on multisensory integration.
Werkhoven PJ; van Erp JB; Philippi TG
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Nov; 71(8):1854-61. PubMed ID: 19933568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Humans integrate visual and haptic information in a statistically optimal fashion.
Ernst MO; Banks MS
Nature; 2002 Jan; 415(6870):429-33. PubMed ID: 11807554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Object-based attention is multisensory: co-activation of an object's representations in ignored sensory modalities.
Molholm S; Martinez A; Shpaner M; Foxe JJ
Eur J Neurosci; 2007 Jul; 26(2):499-509. PubMed ID: 17650120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Vision and touch are automatically integrated for the perception of sequences of events.
Bresciani JP; Dammeier F; Ernst MO
J Vis; 2006 Apr; 6(5):554-64. PubMed ID: 16881788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Attention to simultaneous unrelated auditory and visual events: behavioral and neural correlates.
Johnson JA; Zatorre RJ
Cereb Cortex; 2005 Oct; 15(10):1609-20. PubMed ID: 15716469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Vision and Haptics Share Spatial Attentional Resources and Visuotactile Integration Is Not Affected by High Attentional Load.
Wahn B; König P
Multisens Res; 2015; 28(3-4):371-92. PubMed ID: 26288905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Tri-modal integration of visual, tactile and auditory signals for the perception of sequences of events.
Bresciani JP; Dammeier F; Ernst MO
Brain Res Bull; 2008 Apr; 75(6):753-60. PubMed ID: 18394521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Modality-specific selective attention attenuates multisensory integration.
Mozolic JL; Hugenschmidt CE; Peiffer AM; Laurienti PJ
Exp Brain Res; 2008 Jan; 184(1):39-52. PubMed ID: 17684735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The modality shift effect and the effectiveness of warning signals in different modalities.
Rodway P
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2005 Oct; 120(2):199-226. PubMed ID: 15993828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Trust in haptic assistance: weighting visual and haptic cues based on error history.
Gibo TL; Mugge W; Abbink DA
Exp Brain Res; 2017 Aug; 235(8):2533-2546. PubMed ID: 28534068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Integration of vision and haptics during tool use.
Takahashi C; Diedrichsen J; Watt SJ
J Vis; 2009 Jun; 9(6):3.1-13. PubMed ID: 19761294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Young children do not integrate visual and haptic form information.
Gori M; Del Viva M; Sandini G; Burr DC
Curr Biol; 2008 May; 18(9):694-8. PubMed ID: 18450446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Optimal visual-haptic integration with articulated tools.
Takahashi C; Watt SJ
Exp Brain Res; 2017 May; 235(5):1361-1373. PubMed ID: 28214998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Vision holds a greater share in visuo-haptic object recognition than touch.
Kassuba T; Klinge C; Hölig C; Röder B; Siebner HR
Neuroimage; 2013 Jan; 65():59-68. PubMed ID: 23032487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Bimodal sensory discrimination is finer than dual single modality discrimination.
Koene A; Arnold D; Johnston A
J Vis; 2007 Aug; 7(11):14.1-11. PubMed ID: 17997668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
