155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18319279)
21. [Application of a computer-aided detection (CAD) system to digitalized mammograms for identifying microcalcifications].
Bazzocchi M; Facecchia I; Zuiani C; Londero V; Smania S; Bottigli U; Delogu P
Radiol Med; 2001 May; 101(5):334-40. PubMed ID: 11438784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Invariant moment shape description of microcalcifications in digital mammograms.
Coakley K; van Doorn T
Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 1995 Jun; 18(2):114-8. PubMed ID: 7669022
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. [Digital mammography with high-resolution storage plates (CR) versus full-field digital mammography (CCD) (DR) for microcalcifications and focal lesions -- a retrospective clinical histologic analysis (n = 102)].
Schulz-Wendtland R; Lell M; Wenkel E; Böhner C; Dassel MS; Bautz W
Rofo; 2005 Jan; 177(1):67-71. PubMed ID: 15657822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Clinical evaluation of a new set of image quality criteria for mammography.
Grahn A; Hemdal B; Andersson I; Ruschin M; Thilander-Klang A; Börjesson S; Tingberg A; Mattsson S; Håkansson M; Båth M; Månsson LG; Medin J; Wanninger F; Panzer W
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):389-94. PubMed ID: 15933143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Automated detection of microcalcification clusters for digital breast tomosynthesis using projection data only: a preliminary study.
Reiser I; Nishikawa RM; Edwards AV; Kopans DB; Schmidt RA; Papaioannou J; Moore RH
Med Phys; 2008 Apr; 35(4):1486-93. PubMed ID: 18491543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Comparison of full-field digital mammography and film-screen mammography: image quality and lesion detection.
Fischmann A; Siegmann KC; Wersebe A; Claussen CD; Müller-Schimpfle M
Br J Radiol; 2005 Apr; 78(928):312-5. PubMed ID: 15774591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Investigation of Exposure Factors for Various Breast Composition and Thicknesses in Digital Screening Mammography Related to Breast Dose.
Alkhalifah K; Brindhaban A
Med Princ Pract; 2018; 27(3):211-216. PubMed ID: 29514152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. [The technique and results of mammography].
Friedrich M
Radiologe; 1993 May; 33(5):243-59. PubMed ID: 8516435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Effect of dose reduction on the ability of digital mammography to detect simulated microcalcifications.
Yakabe M; Sakai S; Yabuuchi H; Matsuo Y; Kamitani T; Setoguchi T; Cho M; Masuda M; Sasaki M
J Digit Imaging; 2010 Oct; 23(5):520-6. PubMed ID: 19415382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. [Digital magnification mammography. A new technique for improved visualization of microcalcifications in breast cancer diagnosis].
Reuther G; Hoffmann R; Bier B
Radiologe; 1993 May; 33(5):260-6. PubMed ID: 8516436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. A comparative study of physical image quality in digital and synthetic mammography from commercially available mammography systems.
Baldelli P; Bertolini M; Contillo A; Della Gala G; Golinelli P; Pagan L; Rivetti S; Taibi A
Phys Med Biol; 2018 Aug; 63(16):165020. PubMed ID: 29972144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. [Visualization of microcalcifications on mammographies obtained by digital full-field mammography in comparison to conventional film-screen mammography].
Diekmann S; Bick U; von Heyden H; Diekmann F
Rofo; 2003 Jun; 175(6):775-9. PubMed ID: 12811689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Image quality in digital mammography: image acquisition.
Williams MB; Yaffe MJ; Maidment AD; Martin MC; Seibert JA; Pisano ED
J Am Coll Radiol; 2006 Aug; 3(8):589-608. PubMed ID: 17412134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. A similarity learning approach to content-based image retrieval: application to digital mammography.
El-Naqa I; Yang Y; Galatsanos NP; Nishikawa RM; Wernick MN
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2004 Oct; 23(10):1233-44. PubMed ID: 15493691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Automatic computer detection of clustered calcifications in digital mammograms.
Davies DH; Dance DR
Phys Med Biol; 1990 Aug; 35(8):1111-8. PubMed ID: 2217536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Screen-film mammography and soft-copy full-field digital mammography: comparison in the patients with microcalcifications.
Kim HS; Han BK; Choo KS; Jeon YH; Kim JH; Choe YH
Korean J Radiol; 2005; 6(4):214-20. PubMed ID: 16374078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Detection of simulated microcalcifications in fixed mammary tissue: An ROC study of the effect of local versus global histogram equalization.
Sund T; Olsen JB
Acta Radiol; 2006 Sep; 47(7):650-4. PubMed ID: 16950699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Breast arterial calcifications on mammography: intra- and inter-observer reproducibility of a semi-automatic quantification tool.
Trimboli RM; Codari M; Bert A; Carbonaro LA; Maccagnoni S; Raciti D; Bernardi D; Clauser P; Losio C; Tagliafico A; Sardanelli F
Radiol Med; 2018 Mar; 123(3):168-173. PubMed ID: 29086382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Computer analysis of mammography phantom images (CAMPI): an application to the measurement of microcalcification image quality of directly acquired digital images.
Chakraborty DP
Med Phys; 1997 Aug; 24(8):1269-77. PubMed ID: 9284251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Accurate segmentation and contrast measurement of microcalcifications in mammograms: a phantom study.
Veldkamp WJ; Karssemeijer N
Med Phys; 1998 Jul; 25(7 Pt 1):1102-10. PubMed ID: 9682195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
