These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18319280)

  • 1. Extremity dosimetry trial: Devonport Royal Dockyard.
    Kenyon R; Collison R
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 130(3):269-84. PubMed ID: 18319280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Personal photon dosemeter trial--Devonport Royal Dockyard.
    Collison R
    J Radiol Prot; 2005 Mar; 25(1):1-32. PubMed ID: 15798276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A review of the (60)Co internal dosimetry at Devonport Royal Dockyard.
    Vickers JM; Collison R
    J Radiol Prot; 2010 Mar; 30(1):37-48. PubMed ID: 20220215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Further comment on 'Personal photon dosemeter trial--Devonport Royal Dockyard'.
    Nicholls C
    J Radiol Prot; 2005 Sep; 25(3):323-4. PubMed ID: 16312032
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comment on 'Personal photon dosemeter trial---Devonport Royal Dockyard' by R Collison.
    Gilvin P
    J Radiol Prot; 2005 Sep; 25(3):321-3; author reply 323. PubMed ID: 16286695
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The use of active personal dosemeters as a personal monitoring device: comparison with TL dosimetry.
    Boziari A; Koukorava C; Carinou E; Hourdakis CJ; Kamenopoulou V
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2011 Mar; 144(1-4):173-6. PubMed ID: 21196464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Hp(0.07) photon irradiations at Seibersdorf for the EURADOS extremity dosemeter intercomparison 2009.
    Stadtmann H; Hranitzky C
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2011 Mar; 144(1-4):306-9. PubMed ID: 21208935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Operational experience of electronic active personal dosemeter and comparison with CaSo4:Dy TL dosemeter in Indian PHWR.
    Singh VP; Managanvi SS; Bihari RR; Bhat HR
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2013; 156(1):93-102. PubMed ID: 23528326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Different versions of the right answer: the importance of measurement uncertainty in radiation dosimetry.
    Gilvin P; McWhan A
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2011 Mar; 144(1-4):62-6. PubMed ID: 20952420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Occupational radiation exposure during removal of radioactive reactor components from GRR-1 pool.
    Kontogeorgakos D; Tzika F; Valakis S; Stamatelatos IE
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2011 Mar; 144(1-4):632-5. PubMed ID: 21051436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. 2240 IRRADIATED PERSONAL DOSEMETERS FOR THE IC2014 EURADOS INTERCOMPARISON AT SEIBERSDORF.
    Hranitzky C
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2016 Sep; 170(1-4):27-30. PubMed ID: 26311703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Dose rate dependency of electronic personal dosemeters measuring X- and gamma-ray radiation.
    McCaffrey JP; Shen H; Downton B
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 131(2):229-35. PubMed ID: 18420561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison test of electronic dosemeters.
    Butterweck G; Zimmerli HP; Wernli C
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2001; 96(1-3):109-12. PubMed ID: 11586712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Principles for the design and calibration of radiation protection dosemeters for operational and protection quantities for eye lens dosimetry.
    Bordy JM; Gualdrini G; Daures J; Mariotti F
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2011 Mar; 144(1-4):257-61. PubMed ID: 21362692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Electronic neutron personal dosemeters: their performance in mixed radiation fields in nuclear power plants.
    Luszik-Bhadra M; Bartlett D; Boschung M; Coeck M; Curzio G; Derdau D; d'Errico F; Fiechtner A; Itié C; Kyllönen JE; Lacoste V; Lahaye T; Lindborg L; Molinos C; Reginatto M; Schuhmacher H; Tanner R; Vanhavere F
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2006; 120(1-4):378-82. PubMed ID: 16644993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Personal monitor glass badge: theoretical dosemeter response calculated with the Monte Carlo transport code MCNPX.
    Hocine N; Donadille L; Huet C; Itié C; Clairand I
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2011 Mar; 144(1-4):231-3. PubMed ID: 21335330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Response of Harshaw neutron thermoluminescence dosemeters in terms of the revised ICRP/ICRU recommendations.
    Veinot KG; Hertel NE
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 113(4):442-8. PubMed ID: 15788417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Results of the EURADOS extremity dosemeter intercomparison 2009.
    Stadtmann H; Grimbergen TW; Figel M; Romero AM; McWhan AF
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2011 Mar; 144(1-4):275-81. PubMed ID: 21196458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Electronic personal neutron dosemeters for high energies: measurements, new developments and further needs.
    Luszik-Bhadra M
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2007; 126(1-4):487-90. PubMed ID: 17519244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. DETERMINING THE DOSE RATE DEPENDENCE OF DIFFERENT ACTIVE PERSONAL DOSEMETERS IN STANDARDIZED PULSED AND CONTINUOUS RADIATION FIELDS.
    Hupe O; Friedrich S; Vanhavere F; Brodecki M
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2019 Dec; 187(3):345-352. PubMed ID: 31504965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.