These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
193 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1832011)
1. Microsurgical salpingostomy is not an obsolete procedure. Winston RM; Margara RA Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1991 Jul; 98(7):637-42. PubMed ID: 1832011 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Microsurgery of distal tubal lesions. Analysis of 270 operated cases]. Donnez J; Casanas-Roux F J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 1986; 15(3):339-46. PubMed ID: 3734348 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Microsurgery versus laparoscopy in distal tubal obstruction hysterosalpingographically or laparoscopically investigated. Mossa B; Patella A; Ebano V; Pacifici E; Mossa S; Marziani R Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol; 2005; 32(3):169-71. PubMed ID: 16433156 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Microsurgical therapy in tubal sterility]. Fritzsche H Zentralbl Gynakol; 1990; 112(21):1325-9. PubMed ID: 2278215 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Is microsurgery necessary for salpingostomy? The evaluation of results. Winston RM Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 1981 Aug; 21(3):143-52. PubMed ID: 7036983 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Possibilities and limits of endoscopic fallopian tube surgery]. Korell M; Strowitzki T; Hepp H Zentralbl Gynakol; 1995; 117(12):663-9. PubMed ID: 8585362 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]