BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18320195)

  • 1. Dark-lumen MR colonography with fecal tagging: a comparison of water enema and air methods of colonic distension for detecting colonic neoplasms.
    Rodriguez Gomez S; Pagés Llinas M; Castells Garangou A; De Juan Garcia C; Bordas Alsina JM; Rimola Gibert J; Ayuso Colella JR; Ayuso Colella C
    Eur Radiol; 2008 Jul; 18(7):1396-405. PubMed ID: 18320195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Fecal tagging: MR colonography without colonic cleansing.
    Lauenstein TC; Goehde SC; Debatin JF
    Abdom Imaging; 2002; 27(4):410-7. PubMed ID: 12066239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. MR colonography with fecal tagging: barium vs. barium ferumoxsil.
    Achiam MP; Chabanova E; Løgager VB; Andersen LP; Thomsen HS; Rosenberg J
    Acad Radiol; 2008 May; 15(5):576-83. PubMed ID: 18423314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Dark lumen MR colonography based on fecal tagging for detection of colorectal masses: accuracy and patient acceptance.
    Goehde SC; Descher E; Boekstegers A; Lauenstein T; Kühle C; Ruehm SG; Ajaj W
    Abdom Imaging; 2005; 30(5):576-83. PubMed ID: 15759203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Colorectal neoplasm: magnetic resonance colonography with fat enema-initial clinical experience.
    Zhang S; Peng JW; Shi QY; Tang F; Zhong MG
    World J Gastroenterol; 2007 Oct; 13(40):5371-5. PubMed ID: 17879409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. MR colonography with a fecal tagging technique and water-based enema for the assessment of inflammatory bowel disease.
    Boraschi P; Donati F
    Jpn J Radiol; 2016 Aug; 34(8):585-94. PubMed ID: 27209295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. MR colonography without bowel cleansing or water enema: a pilot study.
    Sambrook A; Mcateer D; Yule S; Phull P
    Br J Radiol; 2012 Jul; 85(1015):921-4. PubMed ID: 22167505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. MR colonography: how does air compare to water for colonic distention?
    Ajaj W; Lauenstein TC; Pelster G; Goehde SC; Debatin JF; Ruehm SG
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2004 Feb; 19(2):216-21. PubMed ID: 14745756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Feasibility study of using air as a contrast medium in MR colonography.
    So NM; Lam WW; Mann D; Leung KL; Metreweli C
    Clin Radiol; 2003 Jul; 58(7):555-9. PubMed ID: 12834640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. MR colonography with barium-based fecal tagging: initial clinical experience.
    Lauenstein TC; Goehde SC; Ruehm SG; Holtmann G; Debatin JF
    Radiology; 2002 Apr; 223(1):248-54. PubMed ID: 11930074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Dark-lumen MR colonography.
    Ajaj W; Debatin JF; Lauenstein T
    Abdom Imaging; 2004; 29(4):429-33. PubMed ID: 14716455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. MR colonography with fecal tagging: do individual patient characteristics influence image quality?
    Kinner S; Kuehle CA; Langhorst J; Ladd SC; Nuefer M; Barkhausen J; Lauenstein TC
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2007 May; 25(5):1007-12. PubMed ID: 17457810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Magnetic resonance colonography with limited bowel preparation: a comparison of three strategies.
    Florie J; van Gelder RE; Haberkorn B; Birnie E; Lavini C; Reitsma JB; Stoker J
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2007 Apr; 25(4):766-74. PubMed ID: 17340636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. MR colonography without colonic cleansing: a new strategy to improve patient acceptance.
    Lauenstein T; Holtmann G; Schoenfelder D; Bosk S; Ruehm SG; Debatin JF
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2001 Oct; 177(4):823-7. PubMed ID: 11566681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Feasibility of using automated insufflated carbon dioxide (CO2) for luminal distension in 3.0T MR colonography.
    Zijta FM; Nederveen AJ; Jensch S; Florie J; Bipat S; van der Paardt MP; van Swijndregt AD; Stoker J
    Eur J Radiol; 2012 Jun; 81(6):1128-33. PubMed ID: 21440398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison between CT colonography and double-contrast barium enema for colonic evaluation in patients with renal insufficiency.
    Chung SY; Park SH; Lee SS; Lee JH; Kim AY; Park SK; Han DJ; Ha HK
    Korean J Radiol; 2012; 13(3):290-9. PubMed ID: 22563266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Magnetic resonance colonography without bowel cleansing: a prospective cross sectional study in a screening population.
    Kuehle CA; Langhorst J; Ladd SC; Zoepf T; Nuefer M; Grabellus F; Barkhausen J; Gerken G; Lauenstein TC
    Gut; 2007 Aug; 56(8):1079-85. PubMed ID: 17341542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Prospective comparison of air-contrast barium enema and colonoscopy in patients with fecal occult blood: a pilot study.
    Rockey DC; Koch J; Yee J; McQuaid KR; Halvorsen RA
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2004 Dec; 60(6):953-8. PubMed ID: 15605011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Diagnostic accuracy of MR colonography with fecal tagging.
    Achiam MP; Løgager VB; Chabanova E; Eegholm B; Thomsen HS; Rosenberg J
    Abdom Imaging; 2009 Jul; 34(4):483-90. PubMed ID: 18452023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. MR colonography with fecal tagging: comparison between 2D turbo FLASH and 3D FLASH sequences.
    Papanikolaou N; Grammatikakis J; Maris T; Lauenstein T; Prassopoulos P; Gourtsoyiannis N
    Eur Radiol; 2003 Mar; 13(3):448-52. PubMed ID: 12594545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.