159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18320195)
21. Magnetic resonance colonography: comparison of contrast-enhanced three-dimensional vibe with two-dimensional FISP sequences: preliminary experience.
Lauenstein TC; Ajaj W; Kuehle CA; Goehde SC; Schlosser TW; Ruehm SG
Invest Radiol; 2005 Feb; 40(2):89-96. PubMed ID: 15654253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Dark lumen MR-colonography: initial experience.
Lauenstein TC; Herborn CU; Vogt FM; Göhde SC; Debatin JF; Ruehm SG
Rofo; 2001 Sep; 173(9):785-9. PubMed ID: 11582556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. [MR-colonography in hospitalized patients: feasibility and sensitivity].
Kerker J; Albes G; Roer N; Montag M; Budde T; Schaefer A
Z Gastroenterol; 2008 Apr; 46(4):339-43. PubMed ID: 18393151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Prospective comparison of patient experience with colon imaging tests.
Bosworth HB; Rockey DC; Paulson EK; Niedzwiecki D; Davis W; Sanders LL; Yee J; Henderson J; Hatten P; Burdick S; Sanyal A; Rubin DT; Sterling M; Akerkar G; Bhutani MS; Binmoeller K; Garvie J; Bini EJ; McQuaid K; Foster WL; Thompson WM; Dachman A; Halvorsen R
Am J Med; 2006 Sep; 119(9):791-9. PubMed ID: 16945615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. MR colonography for the assessment of colonic anastomoses.
Ajaj W; Goyen M; Langhorst J; Ruehm SG; Gerken G; Lauenstein TC
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2006 Jul; 24(1):101-7. PubMed ID: 16736477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Implementation of MR colonography.
Achiam MP; Chabanova E; Løgager V; Thomsen HS; Rosenberg J
Abdom Imaging; 2007; 32(4):457-62. PubMed ID: 17019654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Patient acceptance of MR colonography with improved fecal tagging versus conventional colonoscopy.
Achiam MP; Løgager V; Chabanova E; Thomsen HS; Rosenberg J
Eur J Radiol; 2010 Jan; 73(1):143-7. PubMed ID: 19041207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Impact of diet on stool signal in dark lumen magnetic resonance colonography.
Goehde SC; Ajaj W; Lauenstein T; Debatin JF; Ladd ME
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2004 Aug; 20(2):272-8. PubMed ID: 15269953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Magnetic resonance colonography: comparison between T1 high-resolution isotropic volume excitation (THRIVE) and balanced fast field echo (bFFE) using an air enema or water-gadolinium enema.
Kim MS; Park CS; Lee EJ; Rho MH; Park NH; Joh JH; Park HJ; Bae JM
Clin Radiol; 2010 Apr; 65(4):319-24. PubMed ID: 20338400
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. MR colonography vs. optical colonoscopy: comparison of patients' acceptance in a screening population.
Kinner S; Kuehle CA; Langhorst J; Ladd SC; Nuefer M; Zoepf T; Barkhausen J; Gerken G; Lauenstein TC
Eur Radiol; 2007 Sep; 17(9):2286-93. PubMed ID: 17522866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Virtual magnetic resonance colonography.
Debatin JF; Lauenstein TC
Gut; 2003 Jun; 52 Suppl 4(Suppl 4):iv17-22. PubMed ID: 12746264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Magnetic resonance colonography with fecal tagging: an innovative approach without bowel cleansing.
Lauenstein TC; Debatin JF
Top Magn Reson Imaging; 2002 Dec; 13(6):435-44. PubMed ID: 12478023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Contrast optimization for assessment of the colonic wall and lumen in MR colonography.
Luboldt W; Bauerfeind P; Wildermuth S; Debatin JF
J Magn Reson Imaging; 1999 May; 9(5):745-50. PubMed ID: 10331774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Three-dimensional double-contrast MR colonography: a display method simulating double-contrast barium enema.
Luboldt W; Luz O; Vonthein R; Heuschmid M; Seemann M; Schaefer J; Stueker D; Claussen CD
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2001 Apr; 176(4):930-2. PubMed ID: 11264080
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Dark lumen magnetic resonance enteroclysis in combination with MRI colonography for whole bowel assessment in patients with Crohn's disease: first clinical experience.
Schreyer AG; Gölder S; Scheibl K; Völk M; Lenhart M; Timmer A; Schölmerich J; Feuerbach S; Rogler G; Herfarth H; Seitz J
Inflamm Bowel Dis; 2005 Apr; 11(4):388-94. PubMed ID: 15803030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Dark lumen MR colonography: can high spatial resolution VIBE imaging improve the detection of colorectal masses?
Ajaj W; Rühm SG; Papanikolaou N; Lauenstein TC; Gerken G; Goyen M
Rofo; 2006 Nov; 178(11):1073-8. PubMed ID: 17128377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Three-dimensional MR and axial CT colonography versus conventional colonoscopy for detection of colon pathologies.
Haykir R; Karakose S; Karabacakoglu A; Sahin M; Kayacetin E
World J Gastroenterol; 2006 Apr; 12(15):2345-50. PubMed ID: 16688823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Comparison study of different bowel preparation regimens and different fecal-tagging agents on tagging efficacy, patients' compliance, and diagnostic performance of computed tomographic colonography: preliminary study.
Yoon SH; Kim SH; Kim SG; Kim SJ; Lee JM; Lee JY; Han JK; Choi BI
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2009; 33(5):657-65. PubMed ID: 19820488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Colonic masses: detection with MR colonography.
Luboldt W; Bauerfeind P; Wildermuth S; Marincek B; Fried M; Debatin JF
Radiology; 2000 Aug; 216(2):383-8. PubMed ID: 10924558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Efficacy of barium-based fecal tagging for CT colonography: a comparison between the use of high and low density barium suspensions in a Korean population - a preliminary study.
Kim MJ; Park SH; Lee SS; Byeon JS; Choi EK; Kim JH; Kim YN; Kim AY; Ha HK
Korean J Radiol; 2009; 10(1):25-33. PubMed ID: 19182500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
