184 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18320415)
1. Masseter muscle thickness and mechanical advantage in relation to vertical craniofacial morphology in children.
Charalampidou M; Kjellberg H; Georgiakaki I; Kiliaridis S
Acta Odontol Scand; 2008 Feb; 66(1):23-30. PubMed ID: 18320415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. An ultrasonographic evaluation of masseter muscle thickness in different dentofacial patterns.
Rohila AK; Sharma VP; Shrivastav PK; Nagar A; Singh GP
Indian J Dent Res; 2012; 23(6):726-31. PubMed ID: 23649053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The mechanical advantage of the masseter muscle in subjects with different vertical and sagittal facial morphology.
Ferrario VF; Sforza C; Sartori M; Ciusa V
Clin Orthod Res; 1999 Aug; 2(3):162-70. PubMed ID: 10534991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Relationship between masseter muscle thickness and maxillofacial morphology in pre-orthodontic treatment patients.
Soyoye OA; Otuyemi OD; Kolawole KA; Ayoola OO
Int Orthod; 2018 Dec; 16(4):698-711. PubMed ID: 30348502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Muscle thickness, bite force, and craniofacial dimensions in adolescents with signs and symptoms of temporomandibular dysfunction.
Pereira LJ; Gavião MB; Bonjardim LR; Castelo PM; van der Bilt A
Eur J Orthod; 2007 Feb; 29(1):72-8. PubMed ID: 17290018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Masseter muscle thickness in growing individuals and its relation to facial morphology.
Raadsheer MC; Kiliaridis S; Van Eijden TM; Van Ginkel FC; Prahl-Andersen B
Arch Oral Biol; 1996 Apr; 41(4):323-32. PubMed ID: 8771323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Masseter muscle thickness measured by ultrasonography and its relation to facial morphology.
Kiliaridis S; Kälebo P
J Dent Res; 1991 Sep; 70(9):1262-5. PubMed ID: 1918575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Masseter thickness measured by ultrasonography of 50 young healthy adults in relation to facial morphology].
Zhao JZ; Dai Q; Lai QS
Zhongguo Yi Xue Ke Xue Yuan Xue Bao; 2001 Feb; 23(1):60-2. PubMed ID: 12905821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Masseter muscle thickness in different skeletal morphology: an ultrasonographic study.
Rani S; Ravi MS
Indian J Dent Res; 2010; 21(3):402-7. PubMed ID: 20930353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of masseter muscles in relation to treatment with removable bite-blocks in dolichofacial growing subjects: A prospective controlled study.
Lione R; Kiliaridis S; Noviello A; Franchi L; Antonarakis GS; Cozza P
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2017 Jun; 151(6):1058-1064. PubMed ID: 28554451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparative data on facial morphology and muscle thickness using ultrasonography.
Satiroğlu F; Arun T; Işik F
Eur J Orthod; 2005 Dec; 27(6):562-7. PubMed ID: 16135538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Relationship between masseter muscle size and maxillary morphology.
Uchida Y; Motoyoshi M; Shigeeda T; Shinohara A; Igarashi Y; Sakaguchi M; Shimizu N
Eur J Orthod; 2011 Dec; 33(6):654-9. PubMed ID: 21262936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Masseter thickness, endurance and exercise-induced pain in subjects with different vertical craniofacial morphology.
Farella M; Bakke M; Michelotti A; Rapuano A; Martina R
Eur J Oral Sci; 2003 Jun; 111(3):183-8. PubMed ID: 12786947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Study on the association of ultrasonographic thickness and electromyographic activity of masseter muscle in young females with different vertical craniofacial morphology.
Li HT; Cui CJ; Lu SL; He KY
Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2008 Oct; 17(5):529-34. PubMed ID: 18989598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Ultrasound image of human masseter muscle related to bite force, electromyography, facial morphology, and occlusal factors.
Bakke M; Tuxen A; Vilmann P; Jensen BR; Vilmann A; Toft M
Scand J Dent Res; 1992 Jun; 100(3):164-71. PubMed ID: 1631486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Three-dimensional evaluation of masseter muscle in different vertical facial patterns: a cross-sectional study in growing children.
Lione R; Franchi L; Noviello A; Bollero P; Fanucci E; Cozza P
Ultrason Imaging; 2013 Oct; 35(4):307-17. PubMed ID: 24081727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Contribution of jaw muscle size and craniofacial morphology to human bite force magnitude.
Raadsheer MC; van Eijden TM; van Ginkel FC; Prahl-Andersen B
J Dent Res; 1999 Jan; 78(1):31-42. PubMed ID: 10065943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Facial morphology and the size and activity of the masseter muscle].
Ruf S; Pancherz H; Kirschbaum M
Fortschr Kieferorthop; 1994 Oct; 55(5):219-27. PubMed ID: 7995603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Habitual daily masseter activity of subjects with different vertical craniofacial morphology.
Farella M; Michelotti A; Carbone G; Gallo LM; Palla S; Martina R
Eur J Oral Sci; 2005 Oct; 113(5):380-5. PubMed ID: 16202024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Relationships between the size and spatial morphology of human masseter and medial pterygoid muscles, the craniofacial skeleton, and jaw biomechanics.
Hannam AG; Wood WW
Am J Phys Anthropol; 1989 Dec; 80(4):429-45. PubMed ID: 2603948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
