BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

347 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18320417)

  • 21. Power distribution across the face of different light guides and its effect on composite surface microhardness.
    Vandewalle KS; Roberts HW; Rueggeberg FA
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2008; 20(2):108-17; discussion 118. PubMed ID: 18380841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Microhardness evaluation of resin composites polymerized by three different light sources.
    Hubbezoğlu I; Bolayir G; Doğan OM; Doğan A; Ozer A; Bek B
    Dent Mater J; 2007 Nov; 26(6):845-53. PubMed ID: 18203490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Effect of different irradiation times on microhardness and depth of cure of a nanocomposite resin.
    Akram S; Ali Abidi SY; Ahmed S; Meo AA; Qazi FU
    J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2011 Jul; 21(7):411-4. PubMed ID: 21777529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Influence of airborne-particle abrasion on mechanical properties and bond strength of carbon/epoxy and glass/bis-GMA fiber-reinforced resin posts.
    Soares CJ; Santana FR; Pereira JC; Araujo TS; Menezes MS
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Jun; 99(6):444-54. PubMed ID: 18514666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Surface hardness of light-activated resin composites cured by two different visible-light sources: an in vitro study.
    Sharkey S; Ray N; Burke F; Ziada H; Hannigan A
    Quintessence Int; 2001 May; 32(5):401-5. PubMed ID: 11444075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Fracture resistance of short, randomly oriented, glass fiber-reinforced composite premolar crowns.
    Garoushi S; Vallittu PK; Lassila LV
    Acta Biomater; 2007 Sep; 3(5):779-84. PubMed ID: 17420162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Effect of different modes of light curing and resin composites on microleakage of Class II restorations.
    Hardan LS; Amm EW; Ghayad A
    Odontostomatol Trop; 2008 Dec; 31(124):27-34. PubMed ID: 19441264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Light-polymerized compomers: coefficient of thermal expansion and microhardness.
    Kwon YH; Kwon TY; Ong JL; Kim KH
    J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Oct; 88(4):396-401. PubMed ID: 12447216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The effectiveness of different polymerization protocols for class II composite resin restorations.
    de Jong LC; Opdam NJ; Bronkhorst EM; Roeters JJ; Wolke JG; Geitenbeek B
    J Dent; 2007 Jun; 35(6):513-20. PubMed ID: 17383067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. New insight into the "depth of cure" of dimethacrylate-based dental composites.
    Leprince JG; Leveque P; Nysten B; Gallez B; Devaux J; Leloup G
    Dent Mater; 2012 May; 28(5):512-20. PubMed ID: 22217607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Surface hardness properties of resin-modified glass ionomer cements and polyacid-modified composite resins.
    Bayindir YZ; Yildiz M
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2004 Nov; 5(4):42-9. PubMed ID: 15558089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Hardness and diametral tensile strength of a hybrid composite resin polymerized with different modes and immersed in ethanol or distilled water media.
    Aguiar FH; Braceiro AT; Ambrosano GM; Lovadino JR
    Dent Mater; 2005 Dec; 21(12):1098-103. PubMed ID: 15921735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Effect of continuous longitudinal glass fiber reinforcement on the cantilever beam strength of particulate filler composites.
    Kim SH; Christopher Watts D
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2006 Nov; 64(6):383-90. PubMed ID: 17123916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Effect of adhesion to cavity walls on the mechanical properties of resin composites.
    Nayif MM; Nakajima M; Aksornmuang J; Ikeda M; Tagami J
    Dent Mater; 2008 Jan; 24(1):83-9. PubMed ID: 17448531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The effect of fiber position and polymerization condition on the flexural properties of fiber-reinforced composite.
    Lassila LV; Vallittu PK
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2004 May; 5(2):14-26. PubMed ID: 15150631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Influence of the polymerization process on composite resistance to chemical degradation by food-simulating liquids.
    Yap AU; Wattanapayungkul P; Chung SM
    Oper Dent; 2003; 28(6):723-7. PubMed ID: 14653286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Influence of curing lights and modes on cross-link density of dental composites.
    Yap AU; Soh MS; Han TT; Siow KS
    Oper Dent; 2004; 29(4):410-5. PubMed ID: 15279480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Microhardness of different thicknesses of resin composite polymerized by conventional photocuring at different distances.
    Aguirar FH; e Oliveria TR; Lima DA; Ambrosano Gm; Lovadino JR
    Gen Dent; 2008; 56(2):144-8. PubMed ID: 18348370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Bond strength between a silica glass-fiber-reinforced composite and artificial polymer teeth.
    Meriç G; Ruyter IE
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2007 Oct; 65(5):306-12. PubMed ID: 18092203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. In vitro evaluation of five core materials.
    Gu S; Rasimick BJ; Deutsch AS; Musikant BL
    J Prosthodont; 2007; 16(1):25-30. PubMed ID: 17244304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.