These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
265 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18320509)
1. Evaluation of threshold estimation and learning effect of two perimetric strategies, SITA Fast and CLIP, in damaged visual fields. Capris P; Autuori S; Capris E; Papadia M Eur J Ophthalmol; 2008; 18(2):182-90. PubMed ID: 18320509 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. SITA standard in optic neuropathies and hemianopias: a comparison with full threshold testing. Wall M; Punke SG; Stickney TL; Brito CF; Withrow KR; Kardon RH Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2001 Feb; 42(2):528-37. PubMed ID: 11157893 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Sensitivity and specificity of the Swedish interactive threshold algorithm for glaucomatous visual field defects. Budenz DL; Rhee P; Feuer WJ; McSoley J; Johnson CA; Anderson DR Ophthalmology; 2002 Jun; 109(6):1052-8. PubMed ID: 12045043 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of glaucomatous visual field defects using standard full threshold and Swedish interactive threshold algorithms. Budenz DL; Rhee P; Feuer WJ; McSoley J; Johnson CA; Anderson DR Arch Ophthalmol; 2002 Sep; 120(9):1136-41. PubMed ID: 12215086 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Properties of perimetric threshold estimates from Full Threshold, SITA Standard, and SITA Fast strategies. Artes PH; Iwase A; Ohno Y; Kitazawa Y; Chauhan BC Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2002 Aug; 43(8):2654-9. PubMed ID: 12147599 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Reproducibility of visual field end point criteria for standard automated perimetry, full-threshold, and Swedish interactive thresholding algorithm strategies: diagnostic innovations in glaucoma study. Bourne RR; Jahanbakhsh K; Boden C; Zangwill LM; Hoffmann EM; Medeiros FA; Weinreb RN; Sample PA Am J Ophthalmol; 2007 Dec; 144(6):908-913. PubMed ID: 17919445 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A new rapid threshold algorithm for short-wavelength automated perimetry. Bengtsson B Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2003 Mar; 44(3):1388-94. PubMed ID: 12601072 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparing the full-threshold and Swedish interactive thresholding algorithms for short-wavelength automated perimetry. Ng M; Racette L; Pascual JP; Liebmann JM; Girkin CA; Lovell SL; Zangwill LM; Weinreb RN; Sample PA Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2009 Apr; 50(4):1726-33. PubMed ID: 19074800 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of 30-2 Standard and Fast programs of Swedish Interactive Threshold Algorithm of Humphrey Field Analyzer for perimetry in patients with intracranial tumors. Singh MD; Jain K Indian J Ophthalmol; 2017 Nov; 65(11):1198-1202. PubMed ID: 29133651 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Does the Swedish Interactive Threshold Algorithm (SITA) accurately map visual field loss attributed to vigabatrin? Conway ML; Hosking SL; Zhu H; Cubbidge RP BMC Ophthalmol; 2014 Dec; 14():166. PubMed ID: 25539569 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of the new perimetric GATE strategy with conventional full-threshold and SITA standard strategies. Schiefer U; Pascual JP; Edmunds B; Feudner E; Hoffmann EM; Johnson CA; Lagrèze WA; Pfeiffer N; Sample PA; Staubach F; Weleber RG; Vonthein R; Krapp E; Paetzold J Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2009 Jan; 50(1):488-94. PubMed ID: 19060285 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Detecting visual function abnormalities using the Swedish interactive threshold algorithm and matrix perimetry in eyes with glaucomatous appearance of the optic disc. Sakata LM; Deleon-Ortega J; Arthur SN; Monheit BE; Girkin CA Arch Ophthalmol; 2007 Mar; 125(3):340-5. PubMed ID: 17353404 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. SITA Fast, a new rapid perimetric threshold test. Description of methods and evaluation in patients with manifest and suspect glaucoma. Bengtsson B; Heijl A Acta Ophthalmol Scand; 1998 Aug; 76(4):431-7. PubMed ID: 9716329 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of two Humphrey perimetry programs: full threshold and SITA standard testing strategy for learning effect. Yenice O; Temel A Eur J Ophthalmol; 2005; 15(2):209-12. PubMed ID: 15812761 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Swedish Interactive Threshold Algorithm for central visual field defects unrelated to nerve fiber layer. Hirasawa K; Shoji N Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2016 May; 254(5):845-54. PubMed ID: 26279004 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A Comparison between the Compass Fundus Perimeter and the Humphrey Field Analyzer. Montesano G; Bryan SR; Crabb DP; Fogagnolo P; Oddone F; McKendrick AM; Turpin A; Lanzetta P; Perdicchi A; Johnson CA; Garway-Heath DF; Brusini P; Rossetti LM Ophthalmology; 2019 Feb; 126(2):242-251. PubMed ID: 30114416 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of the Humphrey swedish interactive thresholding algorithm (SITA) and full threshold strategies. Sharma AK; Goldberg I; Graham SL; Mohsin M J Glaucoma; 2000 Feb; 9(1):20-7. PubMed ID: 10708227 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The SITA perimetric threshold algorithms in glaucoma. Wild JM; Pacey IE; O'Neill EC; Cunliffe IA Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1999 Aug; 40(9):1998-2009. PubMed ID: 10440254 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A Comparison of the Visual Field Parameters of SITA Faster and SITA Standard Strategies in Glaucoma. Lavanya R; Riyazuddin M; Dasari S; Puttaiah NK; Venugopal JP; Pradhan ZS; Devi S; Sreenivasaiah S; Ganeshrao SB; Rao HL J Glaucoma; 2020 Sep; 29(9):783-788. PubMed ID: 32459685 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Can Swedish interactive thresholding algorithm fast perimetry be used as an alternative to goldmann perimetry in neuro-ophthalmic practice? Szatmáry G; Biousse V; Newman NJ Arch Ophthalmol; 2002 Sep; 120(9):1162-73. PubMed ID: 12215089 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]