264 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18320509)
1. Evaluation of threshold estimation and learning effect of two perimetric strategies, SITA Fast and CLIP, in damaged visual fields.
Capris P; Autuori S; Capris E; Papadia M
Eur J Ophthalmol; 2008; 18(2):182-90. PubMed ID: 18320509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. SITA standard in optic neuropathies and hemianopias: a comparison with full threshold testing.
Wall M; Punke SG; Stickney TL; Brito CF; Withrow KR; Kardon RH
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2001 Feb; 42(2):528-37. PubMed ID: 11157893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Sensitivity and specificity of the Swedish interactive threshold algorithm for glaucomatous visual field defects.
Budenz DL; Rhee P; Feuer WJ; McSoley J; Johnson CA; Anderson DR
Ophthalmology; 2002 Jun; 109(6):1052-8. PubMed ID: 12045043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of glaucomatous visual field defects using standard full threshold and Swedish interactive threshold algorithms.
Budenz DL; Rhee P; Feuer WJ; McSoley J; Johnson CA; Anderson DR
Arch Ophthalmol; 2002 Sep; 120(9):1136-41. PubMed ID: 12215086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Properties of perimetric threshold estimates from Full Threshold, SITA Standard, and SITA Fast strategies.
Artes PH; Iwase A; Ohno Y; Kitazawa Y; Chauhan BC
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2002 Aug; 43(8):2654-9. PubMed ID: 12147599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Reproducibility of visual field end point criteria for standard automated perimetry, full-threshold, and Swedish interactive thresholding algorithm strategies: diagnostic innovations in glaucoma study.
Bourne RR; Jahanbakhsh K; Boden C; Zangwill LM; Hoffmann EM; Medeiros FA; Weinreb RN; Sample PA
Am J Ophthalmol; 2007 Dec; 144(6):908-913. PubMed ID: 17919445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A new rapid threshold algorithm for short-wavelength automated perimetry.
Bengtsson B
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2003 Mar; 44(3):1388-94. PubMed ID: 12601072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparing the full-threshold and Swedish interactive thresholding algorithms for short-wavelength automated perimetry.
Ng M; Racette L; Pascual JP; Liebmann JM; Girkin CA; Lovell SL; Zangwill LM; Weinreb RN; Sample PA
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2009 Apr; 50(4):1726-33. PubMed ID: 19074800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of 30-2 Standard and Fast programs of Swedish Interactive Threshold Algorithm of Humphrey Field Analyzer for perimetry in patients with intracranial tumors.
Singh MD; Jain K
Indian J Ophthalmol; 2017 Nov; 65(11):1198-1202. PubMed ID: 29133651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Does the Swedish Interactive Threshold Algorithm (SITA) accurately map visual field loss attributed to vigabatrin?
Conway ML; Hosking SL; Zhu H; Cubbidge RP
BMC Ophthalmol; 2014 Dec; 14():166. PubMed ID: 25539569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of the new perimetric GATE strategy with conventional full-threshold and SITA standard strategies.
Schiefer U; Pascual JP; Edmunds B; Feudner E; Hoffmann EM; Johnson CA; Lagrèze WA; Pfeiffer N; Sample PA; Staubach F; Weleber RG; Vonthein R; Krapp E; Paetzold J
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2009 Jan; 50(1):488-94. PubMed ID: 19060285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Detecting visual function abnormalities using the Swedish interactive threshold algorithm and matrix perimetry in eyes with glaucomatous appearance of the optic disc.
Sakata LM; Deleon-Ortega J; Arthur SN; Monheit BE; Girkin CA
Arch Ophthalmol; 2007 Mar; 125(3):340-5. PubMed ID: 17353404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. SITA Fast, a new rapid perimetric threshold test. Description of methods and evaluation in patients with manifest and suspect glaucoma.
Bengtsson B; Heijl A
Acta Ophthalmol Scand; 1998 Aug; 76(4):431-7. PubMed ID: 9716329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of two Humphrey perimetry programs: full threshold and SITA standard testing strategy for learning effect.
Yenice O; Temel A
Eur J Ophthalmol; 2005; 15(2):209-12. PubMed ID: 15812761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Swedish Interactive Threshold Algorithm for central visual field defects unrelated to nerve fiber layer.
Hirasawa K; Shoji N
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2016 May; 254(5):845-54. PubMed ID: 26279004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A Comparison between the Compass Fundus Perimeter and the Humphrey Field Analyzer.
Montesano G; Bryan SR; Crabb DP; Fogagnolo P; Oddone F; McKendrick AM; Turpin A; Lanzetta P; Perdicchi A; Johnson CA; Garway-Heath DF; Brusini P; Rossetti LM
Ophthalmology; 2019 Feb; 126(2):242-251. PubMed ID: 30114416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of the Humphrey swedish interactive thresholding algorithm (SITA) and full threshold strategies.
Sharma AK; Goldberg I; Graham SL; Mohsin M
J Glaucoma; 2000 Feb; 9(1):20-7. PubMed ID: 10708227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The SITA perimetric threshold algorithms in glaucoma.
Wild JM; Pacey IE; O'Neill EC; Cunliffe IA
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1999 Aug; 40(9):1998-2009. PubMed ID: 10440254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A Comparison of the Visual Field Parameters of SITA Faster and SITA Standard Strategies in Glaucoma.
Lavanya R; Riyazuddin M; Dasari S; Puttaiah NK; Venugopal JP; Pradhan ZS; Devi S; Sreenivasaiah S; Ganeshrao SB; Rao HL
J Glaucoma; 2020 Sep; 29(9):783-788. PubMed ID: 32459685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Can Swedish interactive thresholding algorithm fast perimetry be used as an alternative to goldmann perimetry in neuro-ophthalmic practice?
Szatmáry G; Biousse V; Newman NJ
Arch Ophthalmol; 2002 Sep; 120(9):1162-73. PubMed ID: 12215089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
