335 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18321264)
1. Effects of implant surface roughness and stiffness of grafted bone on an immediately loaded maxillary implant: a 3D numerical analysis.
Huang HL; Fuh LJ; Hsu JT; Tu MG; Shen YW; Wu CL
J Oral Rehabil; 2008 Apr; 35(4):283-90. PubMed ID: 18321264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Biomechanical effects of a maxillary implant in the augmented sinus: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Huang HL; Fuh LJ; Ko CC; Hsu JT; Chen CC
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(3):455-62. PubMed ID: 19587867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Bone stress and interfacial sliding analysis of implant designs on an immediately loaded maxillary implant: a non-linear finite element study.
Huang HL; Hsu JT; Fuh LJ; Tu MG; Ko CC; Shen YW
J Dent; 2008 Jun; 36(6):409-17. PubMed ID: 18384926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Implant biomechanics in grafted sinus: a finite element analysis.
Fanuscu MI; Vu HV; Poncelet B
J Oral Implantol; 2004; 30(2):59-68. PubMed ID: 15119454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The influence of implant diameter and length on stress distribution of osseointegrated implants related to crestal bone geometry: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Baggi L; Cappelloni I; Di Girolamo M; Maceri F; Vairo G
J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Dec; 100(6):422-31. PubMed ID: 19033026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Implant-bone interface stress distribution in immediately loaded implants of different diameters: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Ding X; Zhu XH; Liao SH; Zhang XH; Chen H
J Prosthodont; 2009 Jul; 18(5):393-402. PubMed ID: 19374710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Finite element analysis of stress-breaking attachments on maxillary implant-retained overdentures.
Tanino F; Hayakawa I; Hirano S; Minakuchi S
Int J Prosthodont; 2007; 20(2):193-8. PubMed ID: 17455444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of diameter and length on stress distribution of the alveolar crest around immediate loading implants.
Ding X; Liao SH; Zhu XH; Zhang XH; Zhang L
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2009 Dec; 11(4):279-87. PubMed ID: 18783411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effects of implant diameter, insertion depth, and loading angle on stress/strain fields in implant/jawbone systems: finite element analysis.
Qian L; Todo M; Matsushita Y; Koyano K
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(5):877-86. PubMed ID: 19865628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Biomechanical simulation of various surface roughnesses and geometric designs on an immediately loaded dental implant.
Huang HL; Hsu JT; Fuh LJ; Lin DJ; Chen MY
Comput Biol Med; 2010 May; 40(5):525-32. PubMed ID: 20385379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Noncemented total hip arthroplasty: influence of extramedullary parameters on initial implant stability and on bone-implant interface stresses].
Ramaniraka NA; Rakotomanana LR; Rubin PJ; Leyvraz P
Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2000 Oct; 86(6):590-7. PubMed ID: 11060433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Three-dimensional numerical simulation of dental implants as orthodontic anchorage.
Gallas MM; Abeleira MT; Fernández JR; Burguera M
Eur J Orthod; 2005 Feb; 27(1):12-6. PubMed ID: 15743858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Threaded versus porous-surfaced implants as anchorage units for orthodontic treatment: three-dimensional finite element analysis of peri-implant bone tissue stresses.
Pilliar RM; Sagals G; Meguid SA; Oyonarte R; Deporter DA
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2006; 21(6):879-89. PubMed ID: 17190297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effects of cortical bone thickness and implant length on bone strain and interfacial micromotion in an immediately loaded implant.
Tu MG; Hsu JT; Fuh LJ; Lin DJ; Huang HL
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(4):706-14. PubMed ID: 20657865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of stress pattern generated through various thread designs of dental implants loaded in a condition of immediately after placement and on osseointegration--an FEA study.
Chowdhary R; Halldin A; Jimbo R; Wennerberg A
Implant Dent; 2013 Feb; 22(1):91-6. PubMed ID: 23287982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Bone loading pattern around implants in average and atrophic edentulous maxillae: a finite-element analysis.
Meyer U; Vollmer D; Runte C; Bourauel C; Joos U
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2001 Apr; 29(2):100-5. PubMed ID: 11465432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Biomechanical response of implant systems placed in the maxillary posterior region under various conditions of angulation, bone density, and loading.
Lin CL; Wang JC; Ramp LC; Liu PR
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(1):57-64. PubMed ID: 18416413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of optimal taper of immediately loaded wide-diameter implants: a finite element analysis.
Atieh MA; Shahmiri RA
J Oral Implantol; 2013 Apr; 39(2):123-32. PubMed ID: 21905902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Stress patterns on implants in prostheses supported by four or six implants: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Silva GC; Mendonça JA; Lopes LR; Landre J
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(2):239-46. PubMed ID: 20369081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Biomechanical interactions in tooth-implant-supported fixed partial dentures with variations in the number of splinted teeth and connector type: a finite element analysis.
Lin CL; Wang JC; Chang WJ
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Jan; 19(1):107-17. PubMed ID: 17944965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
