335 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18321264)
21. Stress distribution around maxillary implants in anatomic photoelastic models of varying geometry. Part I.
Gross MD; Nissan J; Samuel R
J Prosthet Dent; 2001 May; 85(5):442-9. PubMed ID: 11357069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of the effect of different bone quality on stress distribution in an implant-supported crown.
Sevimay M; Turhan F; Kiliçarslan MA; Eskitascioglu G
J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Mar; 93(3):227-34. PubMed ID: 15775923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Comparison of implant body designs and threaded designs of dental implants: a 3-dimensional finite element analysis.
Huang HL; Chang CH; Hsu JT; Fallgatter AM; Ko CC
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(4):551-62. PubMed ID: 17929515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Numeric simulation of time-dependent remodeling of bone around loaded oral implants.
Eser A; Tonuk E; Akca K; Cehreli MC
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(4):597-608. PubMed ID: 19885399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Tilting of splinted implants for improved prosthodontic support: a two-dimensional finite element analysis.
Zampelis A; Rangert B; Heijl L
J Prosthet Dent; 2007 Jun; 97(6 Suppl):S35-43. PubMed ID: 17618932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Bone-implant interface with simulated insertion stress around an immediately loaded dental implant in the anterior maxilla: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Lee JS; Cho IH; Kim YS; Heo SJ; Kwon HB; Lim YJ
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(2):295-302. PubMed ID: 22442767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Analysis of bone-implant interaction phenomena by using a numerical approach.
Natali AN; Pavan PG; Ruggero AL
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2006 Feb; 17(1):67-74. PubMed ID: 16441786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. The use of finite element analysis to model bone-implant contact with basal implants.
Ihde S; Goldmann T; Himmlova L; Aleksic Z
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2008 Jul; 106(1):39-48. PubMed ID: 18439855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Stress analysis in simulation models with or without implant threads representation.
Assunção WG; Gomes EA; Barão VA; de Sousa EA
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(6):1040-4. PubMed ID: 20162107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Predicting time-dependent remodeling of bone around immediately loaded dental implants with different designs.
Eser A; Tonuk E; Akca K; Cehreli MC
Med Eng Phys; 2010 Jan; 32(1):22-31. PubMed ID: 19884034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. The dynamic natures of implant loading.
Wang RF; Kang B; Lang LA; Razzoog ME
J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Jun; 101(6):359-71. PubMed ID: 19463663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Sinus elevation with a cortical bone graft block: a patient-specific three-dimensional finite element study.
Schuller-Götzburg P; Entacher K; Petutschnigg A; Pomwenger W; Watzinger F
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(2):359-68. PubMed ID: 22442776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Shape optimization of dental implants.
Shi L; Li H; Fok AS; Ucer C; Devlin H; Horner K
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(6):911-20. PubMed ID: 18271372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. The staggered installation of dental implants and its effect on bone stresses.
Abu-Hammad O; Khraisat A; Dar-Odeh N; Jagger DC; Hammerle CH
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2007 Sep; 9(3):121-7. PubMed ID: 17716255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. The influence of abutment angulation on micromotion level for immediately loaded dental implants: a 3-D finite element analysis.
Kao HC; Gung YW; Chung TF; Hsu ML
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(4):623-30. PubMed ID: 18807557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Three-dimensional finite-element analysis of functional stresses in different bone locations produced by implants placed in the maxillary posterior region of the sinus floor.
Koca OL; Eskitascioglu G; Usumez A
J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Jan; 93(1):38-44. PubMed ID: 15623996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Stress distribution around maxillary implants in anatomic photoelastic models of varying geometry. Part II.
Gross MD; Nissan J
J Prosthet Dent; 2001 May; 85(5):450-4. PubMed ID: 11357070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Peri-implant bone reactions at delayed and immediately loaded implants: an experimental study.
Kim SH; Choi BH; Li J; Kim HS; Ko CY; Jeong SM; Xuan F; Lee SH
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2008 Feb; 105(2):144-8. PubMed ID: 17764984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Parameters of implant stability measurements based on resonance frequency and damping capacity: a comparative finite element analysis.
Winter W; Möhrle S; Holst S; Karl M
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(3):532-9. PubMed ID: 20556252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Effect of dental implant cross-sectional design on cortical bone structure using finite element analysis.
Abu-Hammad O; Khraisat A; Dar-Odeh N; El-Maaytah M
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2007 Dec; 9(4):217-21. PubMed ID: 18031443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
