These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18321445)

  • 1. SurveillanceMapper: a simple method for creating an overview of quality data.
    Poulsen KB
    Dan Med Bull; 2008 Feb; 55(1):69-71. PubMed ID: 18321445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Patient-experienced quality assessed in two national surveys].
    Freil M; Lorentzen J; Rasmussen L; Gut R; Knudsen JL
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2005 Nov; 167(46):4375-9. PubMed ID: 16287524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Efficiency versus quality in the NHS, in Portugal: methodologies for evaluation].
    Giraldes Mdo R
    Acta Med Port; 2008; 21(5):397-410. PubMed ID: 19187682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Patient satisfaction as quality indicator in a nuclear medicine department].
    García Vicente AM; Soriano Castrejón A; Martínez Delgado C; Poblete García VM; Ruiz Solís S; Cortés Romera M; Rodado Marina S; Talavera Rubio MP; Palomar Muñoz MA
    Rev Esp Med Nucl; 2007; 26(3):146-52. PubMed ID: 17524308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Data collection methods and results in user surveys in mental health care].
    Bjertnaes ØA; Garratt A; Johannessen JO
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2006 May; 126(11):1481-3. PubMed ID: 16732343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [An evaluation of patient satisfaction surveys by heads of hospitals and departments].
    Riiskjaer E; Ammentorp J; Kofoed PE
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2010 Jun; 172(26):1972-7. PubMed ID: 20654286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Clinical leaders' and staff's assessment of the current quality related to the patient pathways and expectations of and knowledge about accreditation--a baseline evaluation in Copenhagen County].
    Gut R; Knudsen JL; Freil M; Jensen AJ
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2006 Nov; 168(46):3993-7. PubMed ID: 17125652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Proposing indicators for the development of nursing care quality in Iran.
    Pazargadi M; Tafreshi MZ; Abedsaeedi Z; Majd HA; Lankshear AJ
    Int Nurs Rev; 2008 Dec; 55(4):399-406. PubMed ID: 19146550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Can patient satisfaction change over time?].
    Riiskjaer E; Ammentorp J; Kofoed PE
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2010 Jun; 172(26):1967-71. PubMed ID: 20654285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Nurses' experiences of and opinions about using standardised care plans in electronic health records--a questionnaire study.
    Dahm MF; Wadensten B
    J Clin Nurs; 2008 Aug; 17(16):2137-45. PubMed ID: 18705735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Patients focus with an eye on the bottom line: using patients surveys for quality improvement.
    Seibert JH
    Caring; 1996 Oct; 15(10):26, 29, 31-7. PubMed ID: 10161681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Patients' experiences--indications for treatment quality in breast cancer surgery].
    Bentzon N; Erichsen CE; Axelsson CK; Freil M
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2006 Jun; 168(23):2252-7. PubMed ID: 16768979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [The Good Medical Department. Results from a national survey of quality in 1998].
    Hellebek A; Lippert S; Zimakoff J; Jensen BA; Hansen MG; Tønnesen J; Brems K; Aarøe I; Bindslev N; Gjørup T; Frølich A; Christy M
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2002 Sep; 164(38):4431-7. PubMed ID: 12362738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Contributions of surgical residents to patient satisfaction: impact of residents beyond clinical care.
    Resnick AS; Disbot M; Wurster A; Mullen JL; Kaiser LR; Morris JB
    J Surg Educ; 2008; 65(3):243-52. PubMed ID: 18571141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Optimizing systems of care for patients with acute myocardial infarction. STEMI networks, telemetry ECG, and standardized quality improvement with systematic data feedback].
    Scholz KH; von Knobelsdorff G; Ahlersmann D; Keating FK; Jung J; Werner GS; Nitsche R; Duwald H; Hilgers R
    Herz; 2008 Mar; 33(2):102-9. PubMed ID: 18344028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Identification of patient information corruption in the intensive care unit: using a scoring tool to direct quality improvements in handover.
    Pickering BW; Hurley K; Marsh B
    Crit Care Med; 2009 Nov; 37(11):2905-12. PubMed ID: 19770735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Where to focus efforts to improve overall ratings of care and willingness to return: the case of Tuscan emergency departments.
    Seghieri C; Sandoval GA; Brown AD; Nuti S
    Acad Emerg Med; 2009 Feb; 16(2):136-44. PubMed ID: 19120049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A before and after study of medical students' and house staff members' knowledge of ACOVE quality of pharmacologic care standards on an acute care for elders unit.
    Jellinek SP; Cohen V; Nelson M; Likourezos A; Goldman W; Paris B
    Am J Geriatr Pharmacother; 2008 Jun; 6(2):82-90. PubMed ID: 18675766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Patient-reported outcome measures: the importance of patient satisfaction in surgery.
    Chow A; Mayer EK; Darzi AW; Athanasiou T
    Surgery; 2009 Sep; 146(3):435-43. PubMed ID: 19715800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Development, testing, and validation of a patient satisfaction questionnaire for use in the clinical genetics setting.
    Zellerino B; Milligan SA; Brooks R; Freedenberg DL; Collingridge DS; Williams MS
    Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet; 2009 Aug; 151C(3):191-9. PubMed ID: 19621441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.