165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18322057)
1. Evaluation of the new Micronaut-Candida system compared to the API ID32C method for yeast identification.
Szabó Z; Tóth B; Kovács M; Kardos G; Maráz A; Rozgonyi F; Majoros L
J Clin Microbiol; 2008 May; 46(5):1824-5. PubMed ID: 18322057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Identification of yeast isolated from dermatological patients by MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry.
Seyfarth F; Wiegand C; Erhard M; Gräser Y; Elsner P; Hipler UC
Mycoses; 2012 May; 55(3):276-80. PubMed ID: 21848605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Evaluation of common commercial systems for the identification of yeast isolates in microbiology laboratories: a multicenter study].
Karabıçak N; Uludağ Altun H; Karatuna O; Hazırolan G; Aksu N; Adiloğlu A; Akyar I
Mikrobiyol Bul; 2015 Apr; 49(2):210-20. PubMed ID: 26167821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of two commercialized systems for the rapid identification of medically important yeasts.
Quindós G; Lipperheide V; Pontón J
Mycoses; 1993; 36(9-10):299-303. PubMed ID: 8015561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Ability of RapID Yeast Plus System to identify 304 clinically significant yeasts within 5 hours.
Kitch TT; Jacobs MR; McGinnis MR; Appelbaum PC
J Clin Microbiol; 1996 May; 34(5):1069-71. PubMed ID: 8727877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of the Pro-Lab ID ring system for the identification of medically important yeasts.
Sekhon AS; Padhye AA; Garg AK; Rae R
Mycopathologia; 1992 Jul; 119(1):11-6. PubMed ID: 1406902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Efficacy of Chromogenic Candida Agar for isolation and presumptive identification of pathogenic yeast species.
Ghelardi E; Pichierri G; Castagna B; Barnini S; Tavanti A; Campa M
Clin Microbiol Infect; 2008 Feb; 14(2):141-7. PubMed ID: 17986267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Are the Conventional Commercial Yeast Identification Methods Still Helpful in the Era of New Clinical Microbiology Diagnostics? A Meta-Analysis of Their Accuracy.
Posteraro B; Efremov L; Leoncini E; Amore R; Posteraro P; Ricciardi W; Sanguinetti M
J Clin Microbiol; 2015 Aug; 53(8):2439-50. PubMed ID: 25994160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of new colorimetric vitek 2 yeast identification card by use of different source media.
Valenza G; Strasen J; Schäfer F; Frosch M; Kurzai O; Abele-Horn M
J Clin Microbiol; 2008 Nov; 46(11):3784-7. PubMed ID: 18799700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Contamination of dairy products by yeasts-like fungi].
Białasiewicz D; Kłosiński M
Wiad Parazytol; 2001; 47(3):345-51. PubMed ID: 16894745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Comparison of Phoenix™ Yeast ID Panel and API® ID 32C commercial systems for the identification of Candida species isolated from clinical samples].
Gayibova Ü; Dalyan Cılo B; Ağca H; Ener B
Mikrobiyol Bul; 2014 Jul; 48(3):438-48. PubMed ID: 25052110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Clinical comparison of the Baxter MicroScan Yeast Identification Panel and the Vitek Yeast Biochemical Card.
Riddle DL; Giger O; Miller L; Hall GS; Woods GL
Am J Clin Pathol; 1994 Apr; 101(4):438-42. PubMed ID: 8160633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry for the identification of medically-important yeasts in the clinical laboratories of Dijon and Lille hospitals.
Sendid B; Ducoroy P; François N; Lucchi G; Spinali S; Vagner O; Damiens S; Bonnin A; Poulain D; Dalle F
Med Mycol; 2013 Jan; 51(1):25-32. PubMed ID: 22703164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of VITEK 2 with ITS2-fragment length polymorphism analysis for identification of yeast species.
Massonet C; Van Eldere J; Vaneechoutte M; De Baere T; Verhaegen J; Lagrou K
J Clin Microbiol; 2004 May; 42(5):2209-11. PubMed ID: 15131191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of updated Vitek Yeast Biochemical Card and API 20C yeast identification systems.
Fenn JP; Segal H; Barland B; Denton D; Whisenant J; Chun H; Christofferson K; Hamilton L; Carroll K
J Clin Microbiol; 1994 May; 32(5):1184-7. PubMed ID: 8051243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of a commercial medium for identification of Candida species.
San-Millán R; Ribacoba L; Pontón J; Quindós G
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis; 1996 Feb; 15(2):153-8. PubMed ID: 8801088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Identification and antifungal susceptibility of a large collection of yeast strains isolated in Tunisian hospitals.
Eddouzi J; Lohberger A; Vogne C; Manai M; Sanglard D
Med Mycol; 2013 Oct; 51(7):737-46. PubMed ID: 23768242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Misidentification of clinical yeast isolates by using the updated Vitek Yeast Biochemical Card.
Dooley DP; Beckius ML; Jeffrey BS
J Clin Microbiol; 1994 Dec; 32(12):2889-92. PubMed ID: 7883873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Yeast identification in routine clinical microbiology laboratory and its clinical relevance.
Agarwal S; Manchanda V; Verma N; Bhalla P
Indian J Med Microbiol; 2011; 29(2):172-7. PubMed ID: 21654115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. DNA microarray based on arrayed-primer extension technique for identification of pathogenic fungi responsible for invasive and superficial mycoses.
Campa D; Tavanti A; Gemignani F; Mogavero CS; Bellini I; Bottari F; Barale R; Landi S; Senesi S
J Clin Microbiol; 2008 Mar; 46(3):909-15. PubMed ID: 18160452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
