These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
6. Cognitively active older adults' comprehension and metacomprehension of negated text. Margolin SJ Exp Aging Res; 2018; 44(4):329-337. PubMed ID: 29757108 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Text cohesion and metacomprehension: immediate and delayed judgments. Lefèvre N; Lories G Mem Cognit; 2004 Dec; 32(8):1238-54. PubMed ID: 15900918 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. So you think you can read? Generalized metacomprehension in younger and older adults. Fulton EK Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn; 2023 Mar; 30(2):181-200. PubMed ID: 34818140 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Neuroscientific information bias in metacomprehension: the effect of brain images on metacomprehension judgment of neuroscience research. Ikeda K; Kitagami S; Takahashi T; Hattori Y; Ito Y Psychon Bull Rev; 2013 Dec; 20(6):1357-63. PubMed ID: 23728726 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Does aging influence people's metacomprehension? Effects of processing ease on judgments of text learning. Dunlosky J; Baker JM; Rawson KA; Hertzog C Psychol Aging; 2006 Jun; 21(2):390-400. PubMed ID: 16768583 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. How Well Do You Think You Summarize? Metacomprehension Accuracy in Younger and Older Adults. Fulton EK J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci; 2021 Mar; 76(4):732-740. PubMed ID: 31677351 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Age differences in rereading. Stine-Morrow EA; Gagne DD; Morrow DG; DeWall BH Mem Cognit; 2004 Jul; 32(5):696-710. PubMed ID: 15552347 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The effects of domain knowledge on metacomprehension accuracy. Griffin TD; Jee BD; Wiley J Mem Cognit; 2009 Oct; 37(7):1001-13. PubMed ID: 19744939 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. In a Concurrent Memory and Auditory Perception Task, the Pupil Dilation Response Is More Sensitive to Memory Load Than to Auditory Stimulus Characteristics. Zekveld AA; Kramer SE; Rönnberg J; Rudner M Ear Hear; 2019; 40(2):272-286. PubMed ID: 29923867 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Generating keywords improves metacomprehension and self-regulation in elementary and middle school children. de Bruin AB; Thiede KW; Camp G; Redford J J Exp Child Psychol; 2011 Jul; 109(3):294-310. PubMed ID: 21397251 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Individual differences in the processing of written sarcasm and metaphor: Evidence from eye movements. Olkoniemi H; Ranta H; Kaakinen JK J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2016 Mar; 42(3):433-50. PubMed ID: 26371496 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The role of working memory capacity in multiple-cue probability learning. Rolison JJ; Evans JS; Walsh CR; Dennis I Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2011 Aug; 64(8):1494-514. PubMed ID: 21722064 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The negative cascade of incongruent generative study-test processing in memory and metacomprehension. Thomas AK; McDaniel MA Mem Cognit; 2007 Jun; 35(4):668-78. PubMed ID: 17848025 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Reading comprehension in aging: the role of working memory and metacomprehension. De Beni R; Borella E; Carretti B Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn; 2007 Mar; 14(2):189-212. PubMed ID: 17364380 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]