These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18323067)

  • 1. Cue-framing effects in source remembering: a memory misattribution model.
    Dobbins IG; McCarthy D
    Mem Cognit; 2008 Jan; 36(1):104-18. PubMed ID: 18323067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The influence of cue probability on item and source judgments in item method directed forgetting.
    Hourihan KL
    Memory; 2021 Oct; 29(9):1136-1155. PubMed ID: 34396918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Source retrieval under cueing: Dissociated effects on accuracy versus confidence.
    Jaeger A; Queiroz MC; Selmeczy D; Dobbins IG
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2020 Aug; 46(8):1477-1493. PubMed ID: 32105146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Could masked conceptual primes increase recollection? The subtleties of measuring recollection and familiarity in recognition memory.
    Taylor JR; Henson RN
    Neuropsychologia; 2012 Nov; 50(13):3027-40. PubMed ID: 22898644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Monitoring the source monitoring.
    Luna K; Martín-Luengo B
    Cogn Process; 2013 Nov; 14(4):347-56. PubMed ID: 23553316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Responsible remembering and forgetting as contributors to memory for important information.
    Murphy DH; Castel AD
    Mem Cognit; 2021 Jul; 49(5):895-911. PubMed ID: 33474691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Framing memories: How the retrieval query format shapes the neural bases of remembering.
    Raposo A; Frade S; Alves M
    Neuropsychologia; 2016 Aug; 89():309-319. PubMed ID: 27373768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Recognition confidence under violated and confirmed memory expectations.
    Jaeger A; Cox JC; Dobbins IG
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2012 May; 141(2):282-301. PubMed ID: 21967231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Using preexperimental familiarity to compare the ICE and cue-overload accounts of context-dependent memory in item recognition.
    Ensor TM; Surprenant AM; Neath I; Hockley WE
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2023 Apr; 49(4):533-546. PubMed ID: 36227292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Configural processing in memory retrieval: multiple cues and ensemble representations.
    Dosher BA; Rosedale GS
    Cogn Psychol; 1997 Aug; 33(3):209-65. PubMed ID: 9245470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Remembering spatial words: Sensorimotor simulation affects verbal recognition memory.
    Kumcu A; Thompson RL
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2022 Sep; 75(9):1694-1710. PubMed ID: 34704887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Boosting confidence without boosting performance: item strength creates the illusion of source accuracy.
    Sanders DMW; Cowell RA; Castillo J; Starns JJ
    Memory; 2022 Oct; 30(9):1172-1191. PubMed ID: 35834397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Age differences in cue utilization during prospective and retrospective memory monitoring.
    Gallant SN; Spaniol J; Yang L
    Psychol Aging; 2019 Jun; 34(4):545-557. PubMed ID: 31021101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effect of test query on recognition event-related potentials (ERPs).
    Andrew Leynes P
    Brain Cogn; 2021 Dec; 155():105814. PubMed ID: 34739915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of age on the neural correlates of retrieval cue processing are modulated by task demands.
    Duverne S; Motamedinia S; Rugg MD
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Jan; 21(1):1-17. PubMed ID: 18476757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Informative and uninformative prestimulus cues at encoding benefit familiarity and source memory.
    Yeh N; Koen JD
    Memory; 2023 Mar; 31(3):367-379. PubMed ID: 36546483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Directed remembering: subliminal cues alter nonconscious memory strategies.
    Mitchell JP; Macrae CN; Schooler JW; Rowe AC; Milne AB
    Memory; 2002; 10(5-6):381-8. PubMed ID: 12396650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Metamemory expectancy illusion and schema-consistent guessing in source monitoring.
    Schaper ML; Kuhlmann BG; Bayen UJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2019 Mar; 45(3):470-496. PubMed ID: 30024249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Preparation breeds success: Brain activity predicts remembering.
    Herron JE; Evans LH
    Cortex; 2018 Sep; 106():1-11. PubMed ID: 29860188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Item repetition and retrieval processes in cued recall: Analysis of recall-latency distributions.
    Jang Y; Lee H
    Mem Cognit; 2019 May; 47(4):792-815. PubMed ID: 30737728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.