These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1832311)

  • 1. Preliminary in vivo biocompatibility studies on perfluorosulphonic acid polymer membranes for biosensor applications.
    Turner RF; Harrison DJ; Rajotte RV
    Biomaterials; 1991 May; 12(4):361-8. PubMed ID: 1832311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Biocompatibility assessment of porous chitosan-Nafion and chitosan-PTFE composites in vivo.
    Liu BJ; Ma LN; Su J; Jing WW; Wei MJ; Sha XZ
    J Biomed Mater Res A; 2014 Jun; 102(6):2055-60. PubMed ID: 23765695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Microtopography and soft tissue response.
    Campbell CE; von Recum AF
    J Invest Surg; 1989; 2(1):51-74. PubMed ID: 2487399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. In vivo biocompatibility of collagen-poly(hydroxyethyl methacrylate) hydrogels.
    Jeyanthi R; Rao KP
    Biomaterials; 1990 May; 11(4):238-43. PubMed ID: 2200533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Implants in the abdominal wall of the rat.
    Thomsen P; Bjursten LM; Ericson LE
    Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg; 1986; 20(2):173-82. PubMed ID: 2948276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Biocompatibility of steroid-HA delivery system using adult castrated rams as a model.
    Benghuzzi H; England B
    Biomed Sci Instrum; 2001; 37():275-80. PubMed ID: 11347402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Biocompatibility of common implantable sensor materials in a tumor xenograft model.
    Gray ME; Meehan J; Blair EO; Ward C; Langdon SP; Morrison LR; Marland JRK; Tsiamis A; Kunkler IH; Murray A; Argyle D
    J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater; 2019 Jul; 107(5):1620-1633. PubMed ID: 30367816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. In vivo evaluation of a novel electrically conductive polypyrrole/poly(D,L-lactide) composite and polypyrrole-coated poly(D,L-lactide-co-glycolide) membranes.
    Wang Z; Roberge C; Dao LH; Wan Y; Shi G; Rouabhia M; Guidoin R; Zhang Z
    J Biomed Mater Res A; 2004 Jul; 70(1):28-38. PubMed ID: 15174106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A ferric chloride pre-treatment to prevent calcification of Nafion membrane used for implantable biosensors.
    Valdes TI; Moussy F
    Biosens Bioelectron; 1999 Jun; 14(6):579-85. PubMed ID: 11459103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. One year histopathological evaluation of fibrous tissue surrounding TCPL implants using adult rats as a model.
    Butler K; Benghuzzi H; Bajpai P; Puckett A; Tucci M; Cason Z; England B
    Biomed Sci Instrum; 1997; 33():233-9. PubMed ID: 9731364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Tissue response to commercial silicone and polyurethane elastomers after different sterilization procedures.
    Zhang YZ; Bjursten LM; Freij-Larsson C; Kober M; Wesslén B
    Biomaterials; 1996 Dec; 17(23):2265-72. PubMed ID: 8968522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Electron and light microscopy examination of capsules around breast implants.
    Wagner H; Beller FK; Pfautsch M
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 1977 Jul; 60(1):49-55. PubMed ID: 327493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Foreign Body Reaction to Implantable Biosensors: Effects of Tissue Trauma and Implant Size.
    Wang Y; Vaddiraju S; Gu B; Papadimitrakopoulos F; Burgess DJ
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2015 Aug; 9(5):966-77. PubMed ID: 26306495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Polymeric "smart" coatings to prevent foreign body response to implantable biosensors.
    Wang Y; Papadimitrakopoulos F; Burgess DJ
    J Control Release; 2013 Aug; 169(3):341-7. PubMed ID: 23298616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A biodegradable vascularizing membrane: a feasibility study.
    Kaushiva A; Turzhitsky VM; Darmoc M; Backman V; Ameer GA
    Acta Biomater; 2007 Sep; 3(5):631-42. PubMed ID: 17507300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Microgrooved silicone subcutaneous implants in guinea pigs.
    Walboomers XF; Jansen JA
    Biomaterials; 2000 Mar; 21(6):629-36. PubMed ID: 10701463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cytological evaluation of the tissue-implant reaction associated with S/C and I/P implantation of ALCAP and HA bioceramics in vivo.
    Butler K; Benghuzzi H; Puckett A
    Pathol Res Pract; 2001; 197(1):29-39. PubMed ID: 11209814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Increased connective tissue attachment to silicone implants by a water vapor plasma treatment.
    Jensen C; Gurevich L; Patriciu A; Struijk JJ; Zachar V; Pennisi CP
    J Biomed Mater Res A; 2012 Dec; 100(12):3400-7. PubMed ID: 22767530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The ultrastructural architecture of the tissue/hard-tissue replacement interface.
    Pearsall AD; Spears R; Chokshi M
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1992 Apr; 50(4):375-84; discussion 384-5. PubMed ID: 1545293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Fibrous capsule formation in response to ultrahigh molecular weight polyethylene treated with peptides that influence adhesion.
    Johnson R; Harrison D; Tucci M; Tsao A; Lemos M; Puckett A; Hughes JL; Benghuzzi H
    Biomed Sci Instrum; 1997; 34():47-52. PubMed ID: 9603011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.