83 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18323401)
1. Tips to help craft a meaningful, targeted data report.
MacVaugh TW
Hosp Mater Manage; 2008 Feb; 33(2):7-8. PubMed ID: 18323401
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Reducing quantitative data errors: tips for clinical researchers.
Schneider JK; Deenan A
Appl Nurs Res; 2004 May; 17(2):125-9. PubMed ID: 15154125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Handling data: concurrent vs. retrospective approach.
Hosp Peer Rev; 2004 Sep; 29(9):121-2. PubMed ID: 15455560
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The ratings game.
Nature; 2010 Mar; 464(7285):7-8. PubMed ID: 20203558
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. [Useful advice on health research data: too little attention paid to the data needs of policy makers].
Schellevis FG
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2009; 153():A71. PubMed ID: 19818188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Precision, reliability, and validity: essential elements of measurement in nursing research.
Houser J
J Spec Pediatr Nurs; 2008 Oct; 13(4):297-9. PubMed ID: 18844949
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Survey research in dermatology: guidelines for success.
Asarch A; Chiu A; Kimball AB; Dellavalle RP
Dermatol Clin; 2009 Apr; 27(2):121-31, vi. PubMed ID: 19254655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Successful links for electronic surveys.
Frederick Amar A
J Forensic Nurs; 2008; 4(3):138-40. PubMed ID: 18798880
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Approved: methodology for conducting unannounced surveys within an 18-39 month window.
Jt Comm Perspect; 2008 Apr; 28(4):1, 3-4. PubMed ID: 18481760
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Methods and approaches in using secondary data sources to study race and ethnicity factors.
Subramanian S
Methods Mol Biol; 2009; 471():227-37. PubMed ID: 19109783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The impact of survey choice on measuring the relative importance of Social Security benefits to the elderly.
Fisher TL
Soc Secur Bull; 2007; 67(2):55-64. PubMed ID: 18457086
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Midwifery data collection: options and opportunities.
Walker DS; Visger JM; Levi A
J Midwifery Womens Health; 2008; 53(5):421-9. PubMed ID: 18761295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Does mode matter? A comparison of telephone, mail, and in-person treatments in contingent valuation surveys.
Maguire KB
J Environ Manage; 2009 Aug; 90(11):3528-33. PubMed ID: 19647362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Population inferences from targeted sampling with uncertain epidemiologic information.
Williams MS; Ebel ED; Wells SJ
Prev Vet Med; 2009 May; 89(1-2):25-33. PubMed ID: 19200614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Making sense of observation].
Pueblas F
Soins Gerontol; 2008; (71):18. PubMed ID: 18615956
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. [Mistakes and omissions in judicial reports prepared in emergency services].
Turla A; Aydin B; Sataloğlu N
Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg; 2009 Mar; 15(2):180-4. PubMed ID: 19353323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Retrospective chart reviews.
Connelly LM
Medsurg Nurs; 2008 Oct; 17(5):322-3. PubMed ID: 19051979
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Health care costing: data, methods, current applications.
Lipscomb J; Yabroff KR; Brown ML; Lawrence W; Barnett PG
Med Care; 2009 Jul; 47(7 Suppl 1):S1-6. PubMed ID: 19536004
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Design, application and testing of the Work Observation Method by Activity Timing (WOMBAT) to measure clinicians' patterns of work and communication.
Westbrook JI; Ampt A
Int J Med Inform; 2009 Apr; 78 Suppl 1():S25-33. PubMed ID: 18951838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Data management for intervention effectiveness research: comparing deductive and inductive approaches.
Monsen KA; Westra BL; Yu F; Ramadoss VK; Kerr MJ
Res Nurs Health; 2009 Dec; 32(6):647-56. PubMed ID: 19882692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
