These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
5. Peer-review: a citadel under siege. Apuzzo ML Neurosurgery; 2008 Nov; 63(5):821. PubMed ID: 19005370 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Peer review and the nursing literature. Dougherty MC Nurs Res; 2009; 58(2):73. PubMed ID: 19289927 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. [How I review an original scientific paper]. Hoppin FG Rev Mal Respir; 2003 Nov; 20(5 Pt 1):671-8. PubMed ID: 14631245 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The matter of standards. III. The editorial process. Wilkins AS Bioessays; 2008 Nov; 30(11-12):1037-9. PubMed ID: 18937297 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Rejection: giving it and taking it. Taylor D J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2008 Oct; 1(4):275. PubMed ID: 19627792 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Peer review. Suggesting or excluding reviewers can help get your paper published. Grimm D Science; 2005 Sep; 309(5743):1974. PubMed ID: 16179438 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Brain tumor and seizures: pathophysiology and its implications for treatment revisited (Epilepsia 2003; 44:1223-1232). Schaller B Epilepsia; 2006 Mar; 47(3):661; discussion 661. PubMed ID: 16529640 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Peer review and scientific misconduct: bad authors and trusting reviewers. Malay DS J Foot Ankle Surg; 2009; 48(3):283-4. PubMed ID: 19423027 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Evidence-based medicine and the peer review process: complementary or at odds? Fisher CG; Vaccaro AR Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 Jan; 37(1):E1-2. PubMed ID: 22179321 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]