These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

1254 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18323444)

  • 21. The relationship between DNA single-stranded damage response and double-stranded damage response.
    Ma A; Dai X
    Cell Cycle; 2018; 17(1):73-79. PubMed ID: 29157089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. FANCD2 influences replication fork processes and genome stability in response to clustered DSBs.
    Zhu J; Su F; Mukherjee S; Mori E; Hu B; Asaithamby A
    Cell Cycle; 2015; 14(12):1809-22. PubMed ID: 26083937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. DNA replication and oncogene-induced replicative stress.
    Hills SA; Diffley JF
    Curr Biol; 2014 May; 24(10):R435-44. PubMed ID: 24845676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Life or Death after a Break: What Determines the Choice?
    Krenning L; van den Berg J; Medema RH
    Mol Cell; 2019 Oct; 76(2):346-358. PubMed ID: 31561953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. DNA double-strand-break repair in higher eukaryotes and its role in genomic instability and cancer: Cell cycle and proliferation-dependent regulation.
    Mladenov E; Magin S; Soni A; Iliakis G
    Semin Cancer Biol; 2016 Jun; 37-38():51-64. PubMed ID: 27016036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Exploring the Influence of Parameters on the p53 Response When Single-Stranded Breaks and Double-Stranded Breaks Coexist.
    Ma A; Dai X
    Interdiscip Sci; 2019 Dec; 11(4):679-690. PubMed ID: 31222582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Replication fork instability and the consequences of fork collisions from rereplication.
    Alexander JL; Orr-Weaver TL
    Genes Dev; 2016 Oct; 30(20):2241-2252. PubMed ID: 27898391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Triplex structures induce DNA double strand breaks via replication fork collapse in NER deficient cells.
    Kaushik Tiwari M; Adaku N; Peart N; Rogers FA
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2016 Sep; 44(16):7742-54. PubMed ID: 27298253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Immunohistoselective sequencing (IHSS) of p53 tumor suppressor gene in human oesophageal precancerous lesions.
    Shi ST; Feng B; Yang GY; Wang LD; Yang CS
    Carcinogenesis; 1996 Oct; 17(10):2131-6. PubMed ID: 8895479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. DNA damage response as a candidate anti-cancer barrier in early human tumorigenesis.
    Bartkova J; Horejsí Z; Koed K; Krämer A; Tort F; Zieger K; Guldberg P; Sehested M; Nesland JM; Lukas C; Ørntoft T; Lukas J; Bartek J
    Nature; 2005 Apr; 434(7035):864-70. PubMed ID: 15829956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. p53-induced apoptosis as a safeguard against cancer.
    Asker C; Wiman KG; Selivanova G
    Biochem Biophys Res Commun; 1999 Nov; 265(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 10548481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Dual roles of telomere dysfunction in initiation and suppression of tumorigenesis.
    Cosme-Blanco W; Chang S
    Exp Cell Res; 2008 Jun; 314(9):1973-9. PubMed ID: 18448098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. High speed of fork progression induces DNA replication stress and genomic instability.
    Maya-Mendoza A; Moudry P; Merchut-Maya JM; Lee M; Strauss R; Bartek J
    Nature; 2018 Jul; 559(7713):279-284. PubMed ID: 29950726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Oxidative DNA damage causes premature senescence in mouse embryonic fibroblasts deficient for Krüppel-like factor 4.
    Liu C; La Rosa S; Hagos EG
    Mol Carcinog; 2015 Sep; 54(9):889-99. PubMed ID: 24788960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The role of p53-mediated apoptosis as a crucial anti-tumor response to genomic instability: lessons from mouse models.
    Attardi LD
    Mutat Res; 2005 Jan; 569(1-2):145-57. PubMed ID: 15603759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. MRE11 Promotes Tumorigenesis by Facilitating Resistance to Oncogene-Induced Replication Stress.
    Spehalski E; Capper KM; Smith CJ; Morgan MJ; Dinkelmann M; Buis J; Sekiguchi JM; Ferguson DO
    Cancer Res; 2017 Oct; 77(19):5327-5338. PubMed ID: 28819025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Genomic instability in precancerous lesions before inactivation of tumor suppressors p53 and APC in patients.
    Yang Y; Fruehauf J; Xiang S; Li CJ
    Cell Cycle; 2006 Jul; 5(13):1443-7. PubMed ID: 16855398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Replication fork progression during re-replication requires the DNA damage checkpoint and double-strand break repair.
    Alexander JL; Barrasa MI; Orr-Weaver TL
    Curr Biol; 2015 Jun; 25(12):1654-60. PubMed ID: 26051888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. HIC1 (hypermethylated in cancer 1) SUMOylation is dispensable for DNA repair but is essential for the apoptotic DNA damage response (DDR) to irreparable DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs).
    Paget S; Dubuissez M; Dehennaut V; Nassour J; Harmon BT; Spruyt N; Loison I; Abbadie C; Rood BR; Leprince D
    Oncotarget; 2017 Jan; 8(2):2916-2935. PubMed ID: 27935866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Replication fork integrity and intra-S phase checkpoint suppress gene amplification.
    Kondratova A; Watanabe T; Marotta M; Cannon M; Segall AM; Serre D; Tanaka H
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2015 Mar; 43(5):2678-90. PubMed ID: 25672394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 63.