These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. Joint photographic experts group (JPEG) compatible data compression of mammograms. Good WF; Maitz GS; Gur D J Digit Imaging; 1994 Aug; 7(3):123-32. PubMed ID: 7948171 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A comparison of wavelet and Joint Photographic Experts Group lossy compression methods applied to medical images. Iyriboz TA; Zukoski MJ; Hopper KD; Stagg PL J Digit Imaging; 1999 May; 12(2 Suppl 1):14-7. PubMed ID: 10342156 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Blocking effect reduction of JPEG images by signal adaptive filtering. Lee YL; Kim HC; Park HW IEEE Trans Image Process; 1998; 7(2):229-34. PubMed ID: 18267397 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Quality of compressed medical images. Shiao YH; Chen TJ; Chuang KS; Lin CH; Chuang CC J Digit Imaging; 2007 Jun; 20(2):149-59. PubMed ID: 17318703 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Interaction between noise and file compression and its effect on the recognition of caries in digital imaging. Janhom A; van der Stelt PF; van Ginkel FC Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2000 Jan; 29(1):20-7. PubMed ID: 10654032 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A novel approach to speckle noise filtering based on Artificial Bee Colony algorithm: an ultrasound image application. Latifoğlu F Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2013 Sep; 111(3):561-9. PubMed ID: 23806680 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of JPEG and wavelet compression of body CT images for direct digital teleradiologic transmission. Kalyanpur A; Neklesa VP; Taylor CR; Daftary AR; Brink JA Radiology; 2000 Dec; 217(3):772-9. PubMed ID: 11110942 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Practical signal-dependent noise parameter estimation from a single noisy image. Liu X; Tanaka M; Okutomi M IEEE Trans Image Process; 2014 Oct; 23(10):4361-71. PubMed ID: 25134082 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Despeckling of medical ultrasound images using data and rate adaptive lossy compression. Gupta N; Swamy MN; Plotkin E IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2005 Jun; 24(6):743-54. PubMed ID: 15957598 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Estimation of images degraded by film-grain noise. Naderi F; Sawchuk AA Appl Opt; 1978 Apr; 17(8):1228-37. PubMed ID: 20197965 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Grading, image analysis, and stereopsis of digitally compressed fundus images. Lee MS; Shin DS; Berger JW Retina; 2000; 20(3):275-81. PubMed ID: 10872933 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Weighted median image sharpeners for the World Wide Web. Fischer M; Paredes JL; Arce GR IEEE Trans Image Process; 2002; 11(7):717-27. PubMed ID: 18244668 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of irreversible JPEG compression for a clinical ultrasound practice. Persons KR; Hangiandreou NJ; Charboneau NT; Charboneau J; James E; Douglas BR; Salmon AP; Knudsen JM; Erickson BJ J Digit Imaging; 2002 Mar; 15(1):15-21. PubMed ID: 12134210 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Statistical model of JPEG noises and its application in quantization step estimation. Li B; Ng TT; Li X; Tan S; Huang J IEEE Trans Image Process; 2015 May; 24(5):1471-84. PubMed ID: 25706636 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Image preprocessing for rotation-invariant pattern recognition in the presence of signal-dependent noise. Terrillon JC Appl Opt; 1996 Apr; 35(11):1879-93. PubMed ID: 21085312 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Iterative image-domain decomposition for dual-energy CT. Niu T; Dong X; Petrongolo M; Zhu L Med Phys; 2014 Apr; 41(4):041901. PubMed ID: 24694132 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]