150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18324414)
1. Temporal dissociation between category-based and item-based processes in rejecting distractors.
Ariga A; Watanabe K
Psychol Res; 2009 Jan; 73(1):54-9. PubMed ID: 18324414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Rejecting salient distractors: Generalization from experience.
Vatterott DB; Mozer MC; Vecera SP
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 Feb; 80(2):485-499. PubMed ID: 29230673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Interference from familiar natural distractors is not eliminated by high perceptual load.
He C; Chen A
Psychol Res; 2010 May; 74(3):268-76. PubMed ID: 19652997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Learned distractor rejection in the face of strong target guidance.
Stilwell BT; Vecera SP
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2020 Sep; 46(9):926-941. PubMed ID: 32391708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The role of distractors in object substitution masking.
Camp SJ; Pilling M; Argyropoulos I; Gellatly A
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2015 Aug; 41(4):940-57. PubMed ID: 25915070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Attentional capture decreases when distractors remain visible during rapid serial visual presentations.
Inukai T; Kumada T; Kawahara J
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 May; 72(4):939-50. PubMed ID: 20436191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. On the fate of distractor stimuli in rapid serial visual presentation.
Dux PE; Coltheart V; Harris IM
Cognition; 2006 Apr; 99(3):355-82. PubMed ID: 15993401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A triple dissociation between learning of target, distractors, and spatial contexts.
Le Dantec CC; Melton EE; Seitz AR
J Vis; 2012 Feb; 12(2):. PubMed ID: 22306889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Saccade target selection: Do distractors affect saccade accuracy?
Findlay JM; Blythe HI
Vision Res; 2009 Jun; 49(10):1267-74. PubMed ID: 18691610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Temporal dissociation between distractors and targets: the impact of residual distractor processing on target responses.
Kritikos A; McNeill J; Pavlis A
J Mot Behav; 2008 Jan; 40(1):29-42. PubMed ID: 18316295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Variation in target and distractor heterogeneity impacts performance in the centroid task.
Lu VT; Wright CE; Chubb C; Sperling G
J Vis; 2019 Apr; 19(4):21. PubMed ID: 30998831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. You look familiar, but I don't care: Lure rejection in hybrid visual and memory search is not based on familiarity.
Wolfe JM; Boettcher SE; Josephs EL; Cunningham CA; Drew T
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2015 Dec; 41(6):1576-87. PubMed ID: 26191615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Top-Down Processes Override Bottom-Up Interference in the Flanker Task.
Avital-Cohen R; Tsal Y
Psychol Sci; 2016 May; 27(5):651-8. PubMed ID: 26993739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Masking of a first target in the attentional blink attenuates the P3 to the first target and delays the P3 to the second target.
Brisson B; Bourassa MÈ
Psychophysiology; 2014 Jul; 51(7):611-9. PubMed ID: 24635583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Steady-state signatures of visual perceptual load, multimodal distractor filtering, and neural competition.
Parks NA; Hilimire MR; Corballis PM
J Cogn Neurosci; 2011 May; 23(5):1113-24. PubMed ID: 20146614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [DYNAMICS OF GAZE FIXATION DURATION AND EVENT RELATED POTENTIALS WHILE PRESENTATION FADING-IN IMAGES AND DISTRACTORS].
Koltunova TI; Podladchikova LN; Shaposhnikov DG; Vladimirski BM; Syrkin LD; Kruchkov BI; Usov VM
Ross Fiziol Zh Im I M Sechenova; 2015 Oct; 101(10):1202-12. PubMed ID: 26827499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Attentional capture during attentional awakening.
Inukai T; Shimomura T; Kawahara JI
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 Jan; 78(1):159-67. PubMed ID: 26453536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Learned suppression for multiple distractors in visual search.
Won BY; Geng JJ
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2018 Jul; 44(7):1128-1141. PubMed ID: 29733673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Distractor interference in selective reaching: dissociating distance and grouping effects.
Keulen RF; Adam JJ; Fischer MH; Kuipers H; Jolles J
J Mot Behav; 2003 Jun; 35(2):119-26. PubMed ID: 12711583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Visual search and the N2pc in children.
Couperus JW; Quirk C
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 Apr; 77(3):768-76. PubMed ID: 25678274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
