These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

190 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18324549)

  • 1. Influence of re-exposure and retrieval disruption during group collaboration on later individual recall.
    Blumen HM; Rajaram S
    Memory; 2008 Apr; 16(3):231-44. PubMed ID: 18324549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of repeated collaborative retrieval on individual memory vary as a function of recall versus recognition tasks.
    Blumen HM; Rajaram S
    Memory; 2009 Nov; 17(8):840-6. PubMed ID: 19882435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The influence of learning methods on collaboration: prior repeated retrieval enhances retrieval organization, abolishes collaborative inhibition, and promotes post-collaborative memory.
    Congleton AR; Rajaram S
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2011 Nov; 140(4):535-51. PubMed ID: 21744986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Does retrieval strategy disruption cause general and specific collaborative inhibition?
    Dahlström Ö; Danielsson H; Emilsson M; Andersson J
    Memory; 2011 Feb; 19(2):140-54. PubMed ID: 21331969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Consensus collaboration enhances group and individual recall accuracy.
    Harris CB; Barnier AJ; Sutton J
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2012; 65(1):179-94. PubMed ID: 21939368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Multiple causes of collaborative inhibition in memory for categorised word lists.
    Hyman IE; Cardwell BA; Roy RA
    Memory; 2013; 21(7):875-90. PubMed ID: 23439153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Shared encoding and the costs and benefits of collaborative recall.
    Harris CB; Barnier AJ; Sutton J
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Jan; 39(1):183-95. PubMed ID: 22686851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The influence of multiple trials and computer-mediated communication on collaborative and individual semantic recall.
    Hinds JM; Payne SJ
    Memory; 2018 Apr; 26(4):415-423. PubMed ID: 28750599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Synchronized brain activity during rehearsal and short-term memory disruption by irrelevant speech is affected by recall mode.
    Kopp F; Schröger E; Lipka S
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2006 Aug; 61(2):188-203. PubMed ID: 16298003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Retrieval opportunities while multitasking improve name recall.
    Helder E; Shaughnessy JJ
    Memory; 2008 Nov; 16(8):896-909. PubMed ID: 18821268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of the timing and identity of retrieval cues in individual recall: an attempt to mimic cross-cueing in collaborative recall.
    Andersson J; Hitch G; Meudell P
    Memory; 2006 Jan; 14(1):94-103. PubMed ID: 16423746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Metacognitive control and strategy selection: deciding to practice retrieval during learning.
    Karpicke JD
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2009 Nov; 138(4):469-86. PubMed ID: 19883131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Deficits in memory retrieval: an argument in favor of frontal subcortical dysfunction in depression].
    Fossati P; Deweer B; Raoux N; Allilaire JF
    Encephale; 1995; 21(4):295-305. PubMed ID: 7588169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Spaced retrieval: absolute spacing enhances learning regardless of relative spacing.
    Karpicke JD; Bauernschmidt A
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Sep; 37(5):1250-7. PubMed ID: 21574747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Does test delay eliminate collaborative inhibition?
    Takahashi M; Saito S
    Memory; 2004 Nov; 12(6):722-31. PubMed ID: 15724361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Implicit proactive interference, age, and automatic versus controlled retrieval strategies.
    Ikier S; Yang L; Hasher L
    Psychol Sci; 2008 May; 19(5):456-61. PubMed ID: 18466406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Retrieval during learning facilitates subsequent memory encoding.
    Pastötter B; Schicker S; Niedernhuber J; Bäuml KH
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Mar; 37(2):287-97. PubMed ID: 21171804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The role of age of acquisition in memory: effects on judgements of learning and recall.
    Illman NA; Morrison CM
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2011 Sep; 64(9):1665-71. PubMed ID: 21838653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Collaborative recall in face-to-face and electronic groups.
    Ekeocha JO; Brennan SE
    Memory; 2008 Apr; 16(3):245-61. PubMed ID: 18324550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Fact learning: how information accuracy, delay, and repeated testing change retention and retrieval experience.
    Barber SJ; Rajaram S; Marsh EJ
    Memory; 2008 Nov; 16(8):934-46. PubMed ID: 18949663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.