536 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18324617)
1. Intra- and interobserver reproducibility study of early fetal growth parameters.
Verburg BO; Mulder PG; Hofman A; Jaddoe VW; Witteman JC; Steegers EA
Prenat Diagn; 2008 Apr; 28(4):323-31. PubMed ID: 18324617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Intraobserver and interobserver reproducibility of fetal biometry.
Perni SC; Chervenak FA; Kalish RB; Magherini-Rothe S; Predanic M; Streltzoff J; Skupski DW
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Nov; 24(6):654-8. PubMed ID: 15476300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Measurement error for ultrasound fetal biometry performed by paramedics in rural Bangladesh.
Neufeld LM; Wagatsuma Y; Hussain R; Begum M; Frongillo EA
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Oct; 34(4):387-94. PubMed ID: 19504627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Fetal biometry by an inexperienced operator using two- and three-dimensional ultrasound.
Yang F; Leung KY; Lee YP; Chan HY; Tang MH
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2010 May; 35(5):566-71. PubMed ID: 20183864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Study of accuracy of commonly used fetal parameters for estimation of gestational age.
Karki DB; Sharmqa UK; Rauniyar RK
JNMA J Nepal Med Assoc; 2006; 45(162):233-7. PubMed ID: 17189967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Reproducibility study of crown-rump length and biparietal diameter measurements in the first trimester.
Souka AP; Pilalis A; Papastefanou I; Salamalekis G; Kassanos D
Prenat Diagn; 2012 Dec; 32(12):1158-65. PubMed ID: 23033198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Clinical implications of intra- and interobserver reproducibility of transvaginal sonographic measurement of gestational sac and crown-rump length at 6-9 weeks' gestation.
Pexsters A; Luts J; Van Schoubroeck D; Bottomley C; Van Calster B; Van Huffel S; Abdallah Y; D'Hooghe T; Lees C; Timmerman D; Bourne T
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Nov; 38(5):510-5. PubMed ID: 21077156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Revisiting first-trimester fetal biometry.
Salomon LJ; Bernard JP; Duyme M; Dorion A; Ville Y
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2003 Jul; 22(1):63-6. PubMed ID: 12858306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Intra- and interobserver variability in fetal ultrasound measurements.
Sarris I; Ioannou C; Chamberlain P; Ohuma E; Roseman F; Hoch L; Altman DG; Papageorghiou AT;
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2012 Mar; 39(3):266-73. PubMed ID: 22535628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Common fetal measurements: a comparison between ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging.
Parkar AP; Olsen ØE; Gjelland K; Kiserud T; Rosendahl K
Acta Radiol; 2010 Feb; 51(1):85-91. PubMed ID: 20088642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. First-trimester ultrasound dating of twin pregnancy: are singleton charts reliable?
Dias T; Mahsud-Dornan S; Thilaganathan B; Papageorghiou A; Bhide A
BJOG; 2010 Jul; 117(8):979-84. PubMed ID: 20482534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Reference values for fetal limb biometry at 10-14 weeks of gestation.
De Biasio P; Prefumo F; Lantieri PB; Venturini PL
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2002 Jun; 19(6):588-91. PubMed ID: 12047539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Determination of gestational age after the 24th week of gestation from fetal kidney length measurements.
Konje JC; Abrams KR; Bell SC; Taylor DJ
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2002 Jun; 19(6):592-7. PubMed ID: 12047540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Gestational age in pregnancies conceived after in vitro fertilization: a comparison between age assessed from oocyte retrieval, crown-rump length and biparietal diameter.
Tunón K; Eik-Nes SH; Grøttum P; Von Düring V; Kahn JA
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2000 Jan; 15(1):41-6. PubMed ID: 10776011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Ultrasound dating at 12-14 weeks of gestation. A prospective cross-validation of established dating formulae in in-vitro fertilized pregnancies.
Sladkevicius P; Saltvedt S; Almström H; Kublickas M; Grunewald C; Valentin L
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Oct; 26(5):504-11. PubMed ID: 16149101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Biometry and fetal weight estimation by two-dimensional and three-dimensional ultrasonography: an intraobserver and interobserver reliability and agreement study.
Lima JC; Miyague AH; Filho FM; Nastri CO; Martins WP
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2012 Aug; 40(2):186-93. PubMed ID: 22102507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Automated ultrasonographic measurement of basic fetal growth parameters.
Pashaj S; Merz E; Petrela E
Ultraschall Med; 2013 Apr; 34(2):137-44. PubMed ID: 23129519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. First-trimester screening for fetal triploidy at 11 to 14 weeks: a role for fetal biometry.
Salomon LJ; Bernard JP; Nizard J; Ville Y
Prenat Diagn; 2005 Jun; 25(6):479-83. PubMed ID: 15966039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Early fetal size and growth as predictors of adverse outcome.
Pedersen NG; Figueras F; Wøjdemann KR; Tabor A; Gardosi J
Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Oct; 112(4):765-71. PubMed ID: 18827118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Influence of maternal body mass index on interobserver variability of fetal ultrasound biometry and amniotic-fluid assessment in late pregnancy.
Martins JG; Kawakita T; Gurganus M; Baraki D; Jain P; Papageorghiou AT; Abuhamad AZ
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Dec; 58(6):892-899. PubMed ID: 33836119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
