BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

446 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18324631)

  • 1. Sexing skulls using discriminant function analysis of visually assessed traits.
    Walker PL
    Am J Phys Anthropol; 2008 May; 136(1):39-50. PubMed ID: 18324631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Technical note: prediction of sex based on five skull traits using decision analysis (CHAID).
    Stevenson JC; Mahoney ER; Walker PL; Everson PM
    Am J Phys Anthropol; 2009 Jul; 139(3):434-41. PubMed ID: 19350636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of discriminant functions for sexing skulls from visually assessed traits applied in the Rainer Osteological Collection (Bucharest, Romania).
    Soficaru A; Constantinescu M; Culea M; Ionică C
    Homo; 2014 Dec; 65(6):464-75. PubMed ID: 25457446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A pilot study on assessment of racial affinity of Sri Lankan population using discriminant function statistics and a few established morphological racial traits.
    Perera P; Pathmeswaran A
    Leg Med (Tokyo); 2009 Apr; 11 Suppl 1():S182-5. PubMed ID: 19261526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The skull and humerus in the determination of sex: reliability of discriminant function equations.
    Robinson MS; Bidmos MA
    Forensic Sci Int; 2009 Apr; 186(1-3):86.e1-5. PubMed ID: 19216037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Use of ordinal categorical variables in skeletal assessment of sex from the cranium.
    Konigsberg LW; Hens SM
    Am J Phys Anthropol; 1998 Sep; 107(1):97-112. PubMed ID: 9740304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The reliability of sex determination of skeletons from forensic context in the Balkans.
    Durić M; Rakocević Z; Donić D
    Forensic Sci Int; 2005 Jan; 147(2-3):159-64. PubMed ID: 15567621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Sexual dimorphism in deciduous crown traits of a European derived Australian sample.
    Adler CJ; Donlon D
    Forensic Sci Int; 2010 Jun; 199(1-3):29-37. PubMed ID: 20304572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Sex determination from the talus and calcaneus measurements.
    Gualdi-Russo E
    Forensic Sci Int; 2007 Sep; 171(2-3):151-6. PubMed ID: 17141438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Assessment of craniometric traits in South Indian dry skulls for sex determination.
    Ramamoorthy B; Pai MM; Prabhu LV; Muralimanju BV; Rai R
    J Forensic Leg Med; 2016 Jan; 37():8-14. PubMed ID: 26519924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Methodology for estimating endocranial capacity in a modern European population.
    Quatrehomme G; Ponsaillé J; Jardin Pd; Leccia C; Alunni V
    Forensic Sci Int; 2011 Mar; 206(1-3):213.e1-6. PubMed ID: 21282021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Determining the sex of human remains through cranial morphology.
    Rogers TL
    J Forensic Sci; 2005 May; 50(3):493-500. PubMed ID: 15932077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A comparison between neural network and other metric methods to determine sex from the upper femur in a modern French population.
    du Jardin P; Ponsaillé J; Alunni-Perret V; Quatrehomme G
    Forensic Sci Int; 2009 Nov; 192(1-3):127.e1-6. PubMed ID: 19733989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluating the accuracy and precision of cranial morphological traits for sex determination.
    Williams BA; Rogers T
    J Forensic Sci; 2006 Jul; 51(4):729-35. PubMed ID: 16882212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Sexual dimorphism in human cranial trait scores: effects of population, age, and body size.
    Garvin HM; Sholts SB; Mosca LA
    Am J Phys Anthropol; 2014 Jun; 154(2):259-69. PubMed ID: 24595622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Accuracy and reliability in sex determination from skulls: a comparison of Fordisc® 3.0 and the discriminant function analysis.
    Guyomarc'h P; Bruzek J
    Forensic Sci Int; 2011 May; 208(1-3):180.e1-6. PubMed ID: 21482050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Reexamination of a measurement for sexual determination using the supero-inferior femoral neck diameter in a modern European population.
    Alunni-Perret V; Staccini P; Quatrehomme G
    J Forensic Sci; 2003 May; 48(3):517-20. PubMed ID: 12762520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Estimation and evidence in forensic anthropology: sex and race.
    Konigsberg LW; Algee-Hewitt BF; Steadman DW
    Am J Phys Anthropol; 2009 May; 139(1):77-90. PubMed ID: 19226642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Metric sex determination from the pelvis in modern Greeks.
    Steyn M; Işcan MY
    Forensic Sci Int; 2008 Jul; 179(1):86.e1-6. PubMed ID: 18554832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Identification of sex using cranial base measurements.
    Francesquini Júnior L; Francesquini MA; De La Cruz BM; Pereira SD; Ambrosano GM; Barbosa CM; Daruge Júnior E; Del Bel Cury AA; Daruge E
    J Forensic Odontostomatol; 2007 Jun; 25(1):7-11. PubMed ID: 17577972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 23.