These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

448 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18324631)

  • 21. Evaluation of Purkait's triangle method for determining sexual dimorphism.
    Brown RP; Ubelaker DH; Schanfield MS
    J Forensic Sci; 2007 May; 52(3):553-6. PubMed ID: 17456081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Sex determination using the scapula in medieval skeletons from East Anatolia.
    Ozer I; Katayama K; Sağir M; Güleç E
    Coll Antropol; 2006 Jun; 30(2):415-9. PubMed ID: 16848161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A reevaluation of the sex prediction accuracy of the minimum supero-inferior femoral neck diameter for modern individuals.
    Stojanowski CM; Seidemann RM
    J Forensic Sci; 1999 Nov; 44(6):1215-8. PubMed ID: 10582359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Osteometric analysis of sexual dimorphism in the sternal end of the rib in a west African population.
    Wiredu EK; Kumoji R; Seshadri R; Biritwum RB
    J Forensic Sci; 1999 Sep; 44(5):921-5. PubMed ID: 10486942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. A study of sexual variation in Indian femur.
    Purkait R; Chandra H
    Forensic Sci Int; 2004 Nov; 146(1):25-33. PubMed ID: 15485718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Greater sciatic notch morphology: sex, age, and population differences.
    Walker PL
    Am J Phys Anthropol; 2005 Aug; 127(4):385-91. PubMed ID: 15693026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Demographic change and forensic identification: problems in metric identification of Hispanic skeletons.
    Spradley MK; Jantz RL; Robinson A; Peccerelli F
    J Forensic Sci; 2008 Jan; 53(1):21-8. PubMed ID: 18279234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The form of the supraorbital margin as a criterion in identification of sex from the skull: investigations based on modern human skulls.
    Graw M; Czarnetzki A; Haffner HT
    Am J Phys Anthropol; 1999 Jan; 108(1):91-6. PubMed ID: 9915303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Sex determination from the distal part of the femur in a French contemporary population.
    Alunni-Perret V; Staccini P; Quatrehomme G
    Forensic Sci Int; 2008 Mar; 175(2-3):113-7. PubMed ID: 17624707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Determination of sex in South Indians and immigrant Tibetans from cephalometric analysis and discriminant functions.
    Naikmasur VG; Shrivastava R; Mutalik S
    Forensic Sci Int; 2010 Apr; 197(1-3):122.e1-6. PubMed ID: 20083363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Sex assessment from carpals bones: discriminant function analysis in a contemporary Mexican sample.
    Mastrangelo P; De Luca S; Sánchez-Mejorada G
    Forensic Sci Int; 2011 Jun; 209(1-3):196.e1-15. PubMed ID: 21592694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Metacarpal sexual determination in a Spanish population.
    Barrio PA; Trancho GJ; Sánchez JA
    J Forensic Sci; 2006 Sep; 51(5):990-5. PubMed ID: 17018074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Historiography and forensic analysis of the Fort King George "skull": craniometric assessment using the specific population approach.
    Stojanowski CM; Duncan WN
    Am J Phys Anthropol; 2009 Oct; 140(2):275-89. PubMed ID: 19373845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. A Validation Study of the Langley et al. (2017) Decision Tree Model for Sex Estimation.
    Garvin HM; Klales AR
    J Forensic Sci; 2018 Jul; 63(4):1243-1251. PubMed ID: 29148064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Craniometric analysis of the modern Cretan population.
    Kranioti EF; Işcan MY; Michalodimitrakis M
    Forensic Sci Int; 2008 Sep; 180(2-3):110.e1-5. PubMed ID: 18718728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Sex determination using the second cervical vertebra--A test of the method.
    Marlow EJ; Pastor RF
    J Forensic Sci; 2011 Jan; 56(1):165-9. PubMed ID: 20735699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Metric assessment of the "mastoid triangle" for sex determination: a validation study.
    Kemkes A; Göbel T
    J Forensic Sci; 2006 Sep; 51(5):985-9. PubMed ID: 17018073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Metric determination of sex from the humerus in a Guatemalan forensic sample.
    Ríos Frutos L
    Forensic Sci Int; 2005 Jan; 147(2-3):153-7. PubMed ID: 15567620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Univariate sex dimorphism in the Nepalese dentition and the use of discriminant functions in gender assessment.
    Acharya AB; Mainali S
    Forensic Sci Int; 2007 Nov; 173(1):47-56. PubMed ID: 17320321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Sex determination from the radius and ulna in a modern South African sample.
    Barrier IL; L'Abbé EN
    Forensic Sci Int; 2008 Jul; 179(1):85.e1-7. PubMed ID: 18511225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 23.