BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

277 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18324871)

  • 1. Enhancing the ecological risk assessment process.
    Dale VH; Biddinger GR; Newman MC; Oris JT; Suter GW; Thompson T; Armitage TM; Meyer JL; Allen-King RM; Burton GA; Chapman PM; Conquest LL; Fernandez IJ; Landis WG; Master LL; Mitsch WJ; Mueller TC; Rabeni CF; Rodewald AD; Sanders JG; van Heerden IL
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2008 Jul; 4(3):306-13. PubMed ID: 18324871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Risk management frameworks for human health and environmental risks.
    Jardine C; Hrudey S; Shortreed J; Craig L; Krewski D; Furgal C; McColl S
    J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev; 2003; 6(6):569-720. PubMed ID: 14698953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Translating ecological risk to ecosystem service loss.
    Munns WR; Helm RC; Adams WJ; Clements WH; Cramer MA; Curry M; DiPinto LM; Johns DM; Seiler R; Williams LL; Young D
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2009 Oct; 5(4):500-14. PubMed ID: 19545189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany.
    Bekkering GE; Kleijnen J
    Eur J Health Econ; 2008 Nov; 9 Suppl 1():5-29. PubMed ID: 18987905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany].
    Bekkering GE; Kleijnen J
    Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 2008 Dec; 133 Suppl 7():S225-46. PubMed ID: 19034813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The integration of ecological risk assessment and structured decision making into watershed management.
    Ohlson DW; Serveiss VB
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2007 Jan; 3(1):118-28. PubMed ID: 17283600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Framework for metals risk assessment.
    Fairbrother A; Wenstel R; Sappington K; Wood W
    Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2007 Oct; 68(2):145-227. PubMed ID: 17889701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The strengths of the ecological risk assessment process: linking science to decision making.
    Barnthouse L
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2008 Jul; 4(3):299-305. PubMed ID: 18597567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An examination of ecological risk assessment and management practices.
    Hope BK
    Environ Int; 2006 Dec; 32(8):983-95. PubMed ID: 16843527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Addressing uncertainties in the ERICA Integrated Approach.
    Oughton DH; Agüero A; Avila R; Brown JE; Copplestone D; Gilek M
    J Environ Radioact; 2008 Sep; 99(9):1384-92. PubMed ID: 18508164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Framework for use of toxicity screening tools in context-based decision-making.
    Doull J; Borzelleca JF; Becker R; Daston G; DeSesso J; Fan A; Fenner-Crisp P; Holsapple M; Holson J; Craig Llewellyn G; MacGregor J; Seed J; Walls I; Woo YT; Olin S
    Food Chem Toxicol; 2007 May; 45(5):759-96. PubMed ID: 17215066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Development of a preliminary relative risk model for evaluating regional ecological conditions in the Delaware River Estuary, USA.
    Iannuzzi TJ; Durda JL; Preziosi DV; Ludwig DF; Stahl RG; DeSantis AA; Hoke RA
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2010 Jan; 6(1):164-79. PubMed ID: 19689170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Ecological effects of diffuse mixed pollution are site-specific and require higher-tier risk assessment to improve site management decisions: a discussion paper.
    Leo P; Eijsackers HJ; Koelmans AA; Vijver MG
    Sci Total Environ; 2008 Dec; 406(3):503-17. PubMed ID: 18757078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Application of risk assessment and decision analysis to aquatic nuisance species.
    Suedel BC; Bridges TS; Kim J; Payne BS; Miller AC
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2007 Jan; 3(1):79-89. PubMed ID: 17283597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Risk-based approaches to deal with uncertainty in a data-poor system: stakeholder involvement in hazard identification for marine national parks and marine sanctuaries in Victoria, Australia.
    Carey JM; Beilin R; Boxshall A; Burgman MA; Flander L
    Risk Anal; 2007 Feb; 27(1):271-81. PubMed ID: 17362414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A theory of practice for environmental assessment.
    Suter GW; Cormier SM
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2008 Oct; 4(4):478-85. PubMed ID: 18593216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Is epidemiology the key to cumulative risk assessment?
    Levy JI
    Risk Anal; 2008 Dec; 28(6):1507-13. PubMed ID: 18793279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A new process for organizing assessments of social, economic, and environmental outcomes: case study of wildland fire management in the USA.
    Bruins RJ; Munns WR; Botti SJ; Brink S; Cleland D; Kapustka L; Lee D; Luzadis V; McCarthy LF; Rana N; Rideout DB; Rollins M; Woodbury P; Zupko M
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2010 Jul; 6(3):469-83. PubMed ID: 19958050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The contrast between risk assessment and rules of evidence in the context of international trade disputes: can the US experience inform the process?
    Anderson EL; Hilaire CS
    Risk Anal; 2004 Apr; 24(2):449-59. PubMed ID: 15078316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effective coordination and cooperation between ecological risk assessments and natural resource damage assessments: a new synthesis.
    Gouguet RG; Charters DW; Champagne LF; Davis M; Desvouges W; Durda JL; Hyatt WH; Jacobson R; Kapustka L; Longoria RM
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2009 Oct; 5(4):523-34. PubMed ID: 19545190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.