BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

105 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18325070)

  • 1. A two-stage stepwise estimation procedure.
    Chen JT
    Biometrics; 2008 Jun; 64(2):406-12. PubMed ID: 18325070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A model-based approach in the estimation of the maximum tolerated dose in phase I cancer clinical trials.
    He W; Liu J; Binkowitz B; Quan H
    Stat Med; 2006 Jun; 25(12):2027-42. PubMed ID: 16025542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Three p-value consistent procedures for multiple comparisons with a control in direction-mixed families.
    Kwong KS; Cheung SH; Holland B; Wang Y
    Stat Med; 2007 Oct; 26(23):4253-72. PubMed ID: 17342699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A non-parametric approach to the design and analysis of two-dimensional dose-finding trials.
    Ivanova A; Wang K
    Stat Med; 2004 Jun; 23(12):1861-70. PubMed ID: 15195320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. How to deal with multiple treatment or dose groups in randomized clinical trials?
    Hothorn LA
    Fundam Clin Pharmacol; 2007 Apr; 21(2):137-54. PubMed ID: 17391286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Exact, distribution free confidence intervals for late effects in censored matched pairs.
    Daniel SR
    Biom J; 2009 Feb; 51(1):31-44. PubMed ID: 19219909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Multiplicity adjustment for multiple endpoints in clinical trials with multiple doses of an active treatment.
    Quan H; Luo X; Capizzi T
    Stat Med; 2005 Jul; 24(14):2151-70. PubMed ID: 15909290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Kernel estimates of dose response.
    Staniswalis JG; Cooper V
    Biometrics; 1988 Dec; 44(4):1103-19. PubMed ID: 3233249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Nonparametric empirical Bayes method for comparison of treatment effects with application to stress urinary incontinence data.
    Liu C; Shen W; Xie J
    Pharm Stat; 2008; 7(1):42-52. PubMed ID: 17311241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Estimation and confidence regions for multi-dimensional effective dose.
    Li J; Nordheim EV; Zhang C; Lehner CE
    Biom J; 2008 Feb; 50(1):110-22. PubMed ID: 17763378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Confidence interval construction for a difference between two dependent intraclass correlation coefficients.
    Ramasundarahettige CF; Donner A; Zou GY
    Stat Med; 2009 Mar; 28(7):1041-53. PubMed ID: 19142855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Bayesian nonparametric estimation of continuous monotone functions with applications to dose-response analysis.
    Bornkamp B; Ickstadt K
    Biometrics; 2009 Mar; 65(1):198-205. PubMed ID: 18510655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Estimation of likely cancer cure using first- and second-order product densities of population balance models.
    Sherer E; Hannemann RE; Rundell A; Ramkrishna D
    Ann Biomed Eng; 2007 Jun; 35(6):903-15. PubMed ID: 17440813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Voreloxin, formerly SNS-595, has potent activity against a broad panel of cancer cell lines and in vivo tumor models.
    Hoch U; Lynch J; Sato Y; Kashimoto S; Kajikawa F; Furutani Y; Silverman JA
    Cancer Chemother Pharmacol; 2009 Jun; 64(1):53-65. PubMed ID: 18931998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Stochastic modelling of apoptosis kinetics.
    Fennell DA; Pallaska A; Corbo M; Cotter FE
    Apoptosis; 2005 Mar; 10(2):447-52. PubMed ID: 15843905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A discrete-continuous mixture quantile function estimator with a practical application to phase II cancer clinical trials.
    Hutson AD
    Stat Med; 2008 May; 27(12):2094-109. PubMed ID: 18038447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Estimation of cancer drug potencies and relative potencies from in vitro data.
    Le Chap T; Grambsch PM; Liu A
    J Biopharm Stat; 2005; 15(6):903-12. PubMed ID: 16279350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Methods for deriving pesticide aquatic life criteria.
    TenBrook PL; Tjeerdema RS; Hann P; Karkoski J
    Rev Environ Contam Toxicol; 2009; 199():19-109. PubMed ID: 19110939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparing several means of dependent populations of count: a parametric robust approach.
    Tsou TS; Chen CH
    Stat Med; 2008 Jun; 27(14):2576-85. PubMed ID: 17691079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Note in statistical treatment of medical and pharmaceutical data.
    Kawase M; Konishi H; Yagi K; Nishikiori R; Takagi T
    J Biosci Bioeng; 2005 Jul; 100(1):116-8. PubMed ID: 16233861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.