These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

697 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18326720)

  • 1. Reproducibility and clinical relevance of the ocular response analyzer in nonoperated eyes: corneal biomechanical and tonometric implications.
    Moreno-Montañés J; Maldonado MJ; García N; Mendiluce L; García-Gómez PJ; Seguí-Gómez M
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2008 Mar; 49(3):968-74. PubMed ID: 18326720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of central corneal thickness and corneal hysteresis on tonometry as measured by dynamic contour tonometry, ocular response analyzer, and Goldmann tonometry in glaucomatous eyes.
    Hager A; Loge K; Schroeder B; Füllhas MO; Wiegand W
    J Glaucoma; 2008 Aug; 17(5):361-5. PubMed ID: 18703945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Corneal thickness- and age-related biomechanical properties of the cornea measured with the ocular response analyzer.
    Kotecha A; Elsheikh A; Roberts CR; Zhu H; Garway-Heath DF
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2006 Dec; 47(12):5337-47. PubMed ID: 17122122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Biomechanical properties of the cornea in Fuchs' corneal dystrophy.
    del Buey MA; Cristóbal JA; Ascaso FJ; Lavilla L; Lanchares E
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2009 Jul; 50(7):3199-202. PubMed ID: 19255149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Modifications in corneal biomechanics and intraocular pressure after deep sclerectomy.
    Iordanidou V; Hamard P; Gendron G; Labbé A; Raphael M; Baudouin C
    J Glaucoma; 2010; 19(4):252-6. PubMed ID: 19661821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The relationship between diurnal variations in intraocular pressure measurements and central corneal thickness and corneal hysteresis.
    Kotecha A; Crabb DP; Spratt A; Garway-Heath DF
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2009 Sep; 50(9):4229-36. PubMed ID: 19407025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Influence of ocular pulse amplitude on ocular response analyzer measurements.
    Xu G; Lam DS; Leung CK
    J Glaucoma; 2011 Aug; 20(6):344-9. PubMed ID: 20852442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of aging on corneal biomechanical parameters using the ocular response analyzer.
    Kamiya K; Shimizu K; Ohmoto F
    J Refract Surg; 2009 Oct; 25(10):888-93. PubMed ID: 19835329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Intraoffice variability of corneal biomechanical parameters and intraocular pressure (IOP).
    González-Méijome JM; Queirós A; Jorge J; Díaz-Rey A; Parafita MA
    Optom Vis Sci; 2008 Jun; 85(6):457-62. PubMed ID: 18521024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Influence of corneal structure, corneal responsiveness, and other ocular parameters on tonometric measurement of intraocular pressure.
    Broman AT; Congdon NG; Bandeen-Roche K; Quigley HA
    J Glaucoma; 2007; 16(7):581-8. PubMed ID: 18091174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Corneal hysteresis, corneal resistance factor, and intraocular pressure measurement in patients with scleroderma using the reichert ocular response analyzer.
    Emre S; Kayikçioğlu O; Ateş H; Cinar E; Inceoğlu N; Yargucu F; Pirildar T; Oksel F
    Cornea; 2010 Jun; 29(6):628-31. PubMed ID: 20458219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Corneal hysteresis and intraocular pressure measurement in children using the reichert ocular response analyzer.
    Kirwan C; O'Keefe M; Lanigan B
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2006 Dec; 142(6):990-2. PubMed ID: 17157583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Relationship between corneal biomechanical properties, central corneal thickness, and intraocular pressure across the spectrum of glaucoma.
    Kaushik S; Pandav SS; Banger A; Aggarwal K; Gupta A
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2012 May; 153(5):840-849.e2. PubMed ID: 22310080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Intraocular pressure measurement precision with the Goldmann applanation, dynamic contour, and ocular response analyzer tonometers.
    Kotecha A; White E; Schlottmann PG; Garway-Heath DF
    Ophthalmology; 2010 Apr; 117(4):730-7. PubMed ID: 20122737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Corneal biomechanical properties of patients with pseudoexfoliation syndrome.
    Yenerel NM; Gorgun E; Kucumen RB; Oral D; Dinc UA; Ciftci F
    Cornea; 2011 Sep; 30(9):983-6. PubMed ID: 21829105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Repeatability of intraocular pressure and corneal biomechanical properties measurements by the ocular response analyser.
    Kynigopoulos M; Schlote T; Kotecha A; Tzamalis A; Pajic B; Haefliger I
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2008 May; 225(5):357-60. PubMed ID: 18454372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Corneal hysteresis but not corneal thickness correlates with optic nerve surface compliance in glaucoma patients.
    Wells AP; Garway-Heath DF; Poostchi A; Wong T; Chan KC; Sachdev N
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2008 Aug; 49(8):3262-8. PubMed ID: 18316697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of the intraocular pressure measured with the ocular response analyzer.
    Ogbuehi KC; Almubrad TM
    Curr Eye Res; 2010 Jul; 35(7):587-96. PubMed ID: 20597645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Corneal biomechanical properties: precision and influence on tonometry.
    Ogbuehi KC; Osuagwu UL
    Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2014 Jun; 37(3):124-31. PubMed ID: 24121009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Can we measure corneal biomechanical changes after collagen cross-linking in eyes with keratoconus?--a pilot study.
    Goldich Y; Barkana Y; Morad Y; Hartstein M; Avni I; Zadok D
    Cornea; 2009 Jun; 28(5):498-502. PubMed ID: 19421050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 35.