These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
26. The easy option? Australian findings on mothers' perception of elective Caesarean as a birth choice after a prior Caesarean section. McGrath P; Ray-Barruel G Int J Nurs Pract; 2009 Aug; 15(4):271-9. PubMed ID: 19703043 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Impact of cesarean section on neonatal mortality rates among very preterm infants in the United States, 2000-2003. Malloy MH Pediatrics; 2008 Aug; 122(2):285-92. PubMed ID: 18676545 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Cesarean section: Norwegian women do as obstetricians do--not as obstetricians say. Finsen V; Storeheier AH; Aasland OG Birth; 2008 Jun; 35(2):117-20. PubMed ID: 18507582 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Rising cesarean delivery rates: the impact of cesarean delivery on maternal request. Coleman VH; Lawrence H; Schulkin J Obstet Gynecol Surv; 2009 Feb; 64(2):115-9. PubMed ID: 19159495 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Rising cesarean delivery and preterm birth rates: are they related? Leveno KJ Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Apr; 111(4):810-1. PubMed ID: 18378737 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Impact of first childbirth on changes in women's preference for mode of delivery: follow-up of a longitudinal observational study. Pang MW; Leung TN; Lau TK; Hang Chung TK Birth; 2008 Jun; 35(2):121-8. PubMed ID: 18507583 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. A pilot study exploring the impact of maternal age and raised body mass index on caesarean section rates. Naftalin J; Paterson-Brown S J Obstet Gynaecol; 2008 May; 28(4):394-7. PubMed ID: 18604671 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Surrogate markers of healthcare standards. Murphy JF Ir Med J; 2007 Jan; 100(1):324. PubMed ID: 17380918 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. The accuracy of predicting parity as a prerequisite for cesarean delivery on maternal request. Keeton K; Zikmund-Fisher BJ; Ubel PA; Fenner DE; Fagerlin A Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Aug; 112(2 Pt 1):285-9. PubMed ID: 18669724 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Birthing by appointment. Healy B US News World Rep; 2006 Jun; 140(22):70-1. PubMed ID: 17432413 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Do risk factors for elective cesarean section differ from those of cesarean section during labor in low risk pregnancies? Roman H; Blondel B; Bréart G; Goffinet F J Perinat Med; 2008; 36(4):297-305. PubMed ID: 18598118 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Prospective comparison of delivery outcomes of vaginal births after cesarean section versus laparoscopic myomectomy. Makino S; Tanaka T; Itoh S; Kumakiri J; Takeuchi H; Takeda S J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2008 Dec; 34(6):952-6. PubMed ID: 19012692 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Womb service. Why more women are making caesareans their delivery of choice. Park A Time; 2008 Apr; 171(17):65-6. PubMed ID: 18543859 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Prevalence and risk factors of cesarean section in a population of Tunisian diabetic pregnant women. Denguezli W; Hemdane S; Faleh R; Laajili H; Saïdan Z; Haddad A; Sakouhi M Tunis Med; 2007 Nov; 85(11):935-40. PubMed ID: 19166144 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]