109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18327790)
1. Lytic lesions in the femoral neck: Importance of location and evaluation of a novel minimally invasive repair technique.
Kaneko TS; Skinner HB; Keyak JH
J Orthop Res; 2008 Aug; 26(8):1127-32. PubMed ID: 18327790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The effect of simulated metastatic lytic lesions on proximal femoral strength.
Keyak JH; Kaneko TS; Skinner HB; Hoang BH
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2007 Jun; 459():139-45. PubMed ID: 17545762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Feasibility of a percutaneous technique for repairing proximal femora with simulated metastatic lesions.
Kaneko TS; Skinner HB; Keyak JH
Med Eng Phys; 2007 Jun; 29(5):594-601. PubMed ID: 16949854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of finite element analysis for prediction of the strength reduction due to metastatic lesions in the femoral neck.
Cheal EJ; Hipp JA; Hayes WC
J Biomech; 1993 Mar; 26(3):251-64. PubMed ID: 8468338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Prediction of the strength and fracture location of the femoral neck by CT-based finite-element method: a preliminary study on patients with hip fracture.
Bessho M; Ohnishi I; Okazaki H; Sato W; Kominami H; Matsunaga S; Nakamura K
J Orthop Sci; 2004; 9(6):545-50. PubMed ID: 16228668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Predicting proximal femoral strength using structural engineering models.
Keyak JH; Kaneko TS; Tehranzadeh J; Skinner HB
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2005 Aug; (437):219-28. PubMed ID: 16056052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Biomechanical analysis of impending femoral neck fractures: the role of percutaneous cement augmentation for osteolytic lesions.
Palumbo BT; Nalley C; Gaskins RB; Gutierrez S; Alexander GE; Anijar L; Nayak A; Cheong D; Santoni BG
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2014 Mar; 29(3):289-95. PubMed ID: 24461558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Minimally invasive surgery for femoral neck fractures using bone cement infusible hollow-perforated screw in high-risk patients with advanced cancer.
Lin PP; Kang HG; Kim YI; Kim JH; Kim HS
Surg Oncol; 2015 Sep; 24(3):226-31. PubMed ID: 26051408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Prediction of the pathological fracture risk during stance and fall-loading configurations for metastases in the proximal femur, using a computed tomography-based finite element method.
Shinoda Y; Kobayashi H; Kaneko M; Ohashi S; Bessho M; Hayashi N; Oka H; Imanishi J; Sawada R; Ogura K; Tanaka S; Haga N; Kawano H
J Orthop Sci; 2019 Nov; 24(6):1074-1080. PubMed ID: 31521453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Augmentation of femoral neck fracture fixation with an injectable calcium-phosphate bone mineral cement.
Stankewich CJ; Swiontkowski MF; Tencer AF; Yetkinler DN; Poser RD
J Orthop Res; 1996 Sep; 14(5):786-93. PubMed ID: 8893773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. New QCT analysis approach shows the importance of fall orientation on femoral neck strength.
Carpenter RD; Beaupré GS; Lang TF; Orwoll ES; Carter DR;
J Bone Miner Res; 2005 Sep; 20(9):1533-42. PubMed ID: 16059625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Position of hip resurfacing component affects strain and resistance to fracture in the femoral neck.
Vail TP; Glisson RR; Dominguez DE; Kitaoka K; Ottaviano D
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2008 Sep; 90(9):1951-60. PubMed ID: 18762656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Biomechanical and finite element study of drilling sites for benign lesions in femoral head and neck with curettage, bone-grafting and internal fixation.
Dou B; Zhang FF; Ni M; Dai YH; Wang ZY; Qin T; Ma WQ; Zhu W; Mei J
Math Biosci Eng; 2019 Aug; 16(6):7808-7828. PubMed ID: 31698641
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. [Quantitative CT assessment of the proximal femur. Experimental studies on its correlation with breaking load in femoral neck fractures].
Buitrago-Téllez CH; Bonnaire F; Schulze C; Gufler H; Hönninger A; Kuner E; Langer M
Rofo; 1997 Dec; 167(6):627-32. PubMed ID: 9465959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Influence of bone lesion location on femoral bone strength assessed by MRI-based finite-element modeling.
Rajapakse CS; Gupta N; Evans M; Alizai H; Shukurova M; Hong AL; Cruickshank NJ; Tejwani N; Egol K; Honig S; Chang G
Bone; 2019 May; 122():209-217. PubMed ID: 30851438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Femoral bone density measurements by single energy computed tomography related to hip fractures.
Alho A; Høiseth A; Husby T; Ekeland A
Ann Chir Gynaecol; 1988; 77(5-6):208-11. PubMed ID: 3254683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Femoral neck strength of mouse in two loading configurations: method evaluation and fracture characteristics.
Jämsä T; Tuukkanen J; Jalovaara P
J Biomech; 1998 Aug; 31(8):723-9. PubMed ID: 9796672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Finite element analysis on fracture relevance as bone defect of proximal femur].
Zhang S; Tu CQ; Duan H; Min L; Zhou Y; Zhang SL; Jiang Y; Feng P
Sichuan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2011 Mar; 42(2):273-6, 279. PubMed ID: 21500571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Prediction of strength and strain of the proximal femur by a CT-based finite element method.
Bessho M; Ohnishi I; Matsuyama J; Matsumoto T; Imai K; Nakamura K
J Biomech; 2007; 40(8):1745-53. PubMed ID: 17034798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. In vitro measurement of strain in the bone cement surrounding the femoral component of total hip replacements during simulated gait and stair-climbing.
O'Connor DO; Burke DW; Jasty M; Sedlacek RC; Harris WH
J Orthop Res; 1996 Sep; 14(5):769-77. PubMed ID: 8893771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
