These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
177 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18327829)
1. The effects of neuroimaging and brain injury on insanity defenses. Gurley JR; Marcus DK Behav Sci Law; 2008; 26(1):85-97. PubMed ID: 18327829 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Defendants pleading insanity: an analysis of outcome. Janofsky JS; Vandewalle MB; Rappeport JR Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1989; 17(2):203-11. PubMed ID: 2758121 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Determining criminal responsibility: How relevant are insight and personal attitudes to mock jurors? Jung S Int J Law Psychiatry; 2015; 42-43():37-42. PubMed ID: 26294081 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Trial by jury; a pilot study of juror perception of mental health professional testimony in NGRI pleas for first degree international homicide. Palermo GB; Smith MB; Gram LC; Zier W; Kohler ME Med Law; 1996; 15(1):17-42. PubMed ID: 8691998 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Informed decision making in persons acquitted not guilty by reason of insanity. Elliott RL; Nelson E; Fitch WL; Scott R; Wolber G; Singh R Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1993; 21(3):309-20. PubMed ID: 8148513 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The influence of defendant race and mental disorder type on mock juror decision-making in insanity trials. Maeder EM; Yamamoto S; McLaughlin KJ Int J Law Psychiatry; 2020; 68():101536. PubMed ID: 32033700 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Thin slice expert testimony and mock trial deliberations. Parrott CT; Brodsky SL; Wilson JK Int J Law Psychiatry; 2015; 42-43():67-74. PubMed ID: 26346686 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Law & psychiatry: imposed insanity defenses and political crimes. Appelbaum PS Psychiatr Serv; 2013 Jan; 64(1):4-6. PubMed ID: 23280453 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A psychometric study of stereotypes: assessment of malingering in a criminal forensic group. Grossman LS; Wasyliw OE J Pers Assess; 1988; 52(3):549-63. PubMed ID: 3210127 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Insanity plea: predicting not guilty by reason of insanity adjudications. Jeffrey RW; Pasewark RA; Bieber S Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1988; 16(1):35-9. PubMed ID: 3365477 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Empirical research on the insanity defense and attempted reforms: evidence toward informed policy. Borum R; Fulero SM Law Hum Behav; 1999 Jun; 23(3):375-93. PubMed ID: 10439723 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evidence of gender bias in legal insanity evaluations: a case vignette study of clinicians, judges and students. Yourstone J; Lindholm T; Grann M; Svenson O Nord J Psychiatry; 2008; 62(4):273-8. PubMed ID: 18720232 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Guilty or not guilty by reason of insanity? a comparative study of murderers referred for psychiatric examination by court order. Antar AY Health Justice; 2023 Sep; 11(1):35. PubMed ID: 37668924 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Insanity defenses: contested or conceded? Rogers JL; Bloom JD; Manson SM Am J Psychiatry; 1984 Jul; 141(7):885-8. PubMed ID: 6731639 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Juror decision making in not criminally responsible on account of mental disorder trials: Effects of defendant gender and mental illness type. Mossière A; Maeder EM Int J Law Psychiatry; 2016; 49(Pt A):47-54. PubMed ID: 27237958 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Not guilty by reason of insanity: a research note. Pogrebin M; Regoli R; Perry K Int J Law Psychiatry; 1986; 8(2):237-41. PubMed ID: 3957527 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Assessing NGRI and dangerousness: Perspectives from forensic reports in Portugal. R Moreira AL; Miguel C; Sá Ferreira J; Colón MF Int J Law Psychiatry; 2018; 58():171-177. PubMed ID: 29853008 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]