These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18327830)

  • 1. Flickering admissibility: neuroimaging evidence in the U.S. courts.
    Moriarty JC
    Behav Sci Law; 2008; 26(1):29-49. PubMed ID: 18327830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The admissibility of offender profiling in courtroom: a review of legal issues and court opinions.
    Bosco D; Zappalà A; Santtila P
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2010; 33(3):184-91. PubMed ID: 20416950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Neurolitigation: a perspective on the elements of expert testimony for extending the Daubert challenge.
    Klee CH; Friedman HJ
    NeuroRehabilitation; 2001; 16(2):79-85. PubMed ID: 11568465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Handwriting Evidence in Federal Courts - From Frye to Kumho.
    Zlotnick J; Lin JR
    Forensic Sci Rev; 2001 Jul; 13(2):87-99. PubMed ID: 26256304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Through a scanner darkly: functional neuroimaging as evidence of a criminal defendant's past mental states.
    Brown T; Murphy E
    Stanford Law Rev; 2010 Apr; 62(4):1119-208. PubMed ID: 20429137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The role of imaging in United States courtrooms.
    Patel P; Meltzer CC; Mayberg HS; Levine K
    Neuroimaging Clin N Am; 2007 Nov; 17(4):557-67, x. PubMed ID: 17983970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Avoiding ipse dixit mislabeling: post-Daubert approaches to expert clinical opinions.
    Gutheil TG; Bursztajn H
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2003; 31(2):205-10. PubMed ID: 12875499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Beyond Dusky and Godinez: competency before and after trial.
    Perlin ML
    Behav Sci Law; 2003; 21(3):297-310. PubMed ID: 12808692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Brain abnormalities in antisocial individuals: implications for the law.
    Yang Y; Glenn AL; Raine A
    Behav Sci Law; 2008; 26(1):65-83. PubMed ID: 18327831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The admissibility of hypnotic evidence in U.S. Courts.
    Giannelli PC
    Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 1995 Apr; 43(2):212-33. PubMed ID: 7737764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Judicial gatekeeping and the social construction of the admissibility of expert testimony.
    Merlino ML; Murray CI; Richardson JT
    Behav Sci Law; 2008; 26(2):187-206. PubMed ID: 18344168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Introduction to this issue: international perspectives on brain imaging and the law.
    Felthous AR; Sass H
    Behav Sci Law; 2008; 26(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 18327825
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Neuroimaging, culture, and forensic psychiatry.
    Aggarwal NK
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2009; 37(2):239-44. PubMed ID: 19535562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Epidemiology in the courtroom: an evidence-based paradigm for the determination of causation in compensation environments.
    Sinclair DC
    J Occup Environ Med; 2010 Apr; 52(4):456-61. PubMed ID: 20357683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Neuropsychologist experts and neurolaw: cases, controversies, and admissibility challenges.
    Kaufmann PM
    Behav Sci Law; 2013; 31(6):739-55. PubMed ID: 24115139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Admissibility of false-confession testimony: know thy standard.
    Quintieri P; Weiss KJ
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2005; 33(4):535-8. PubMed ID: 16394232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Brain, mind and behaviour. Some medico-legal aspects.
    Fenwick P
    Br J Psychiatry; 1993 Nov; 163():565-73. PubMed ID: 8298823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Psychiatric evidence in criminal courts: the need for better understanding.
    Muzaffar S
    Med Sci Law; 2011 Jul; 51(3):141-5. PubMed ID: 21905568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Inconsistency in evidentiary standards for medical testimony: disorder in the courts.
    Kassirer JP; Cecil JS
    JAMA; 2002 Sep; 288(11):1382-7. PubMed ID: 12234232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. From impartial expert to adversary in the wake of Ake.
    Rachlin S
    Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1988; 16(1):25-33. PubMed ID: 3365476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.