242 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18327920)
1. Prediction of analyte retention for ion chromatography separations performed using elution profiles comprising multiple isocratic and gradient steps.
Shellie RA; Ng BK; Dicinoski GW; Poynter SD; O'Reilly JW; Pohl CA; Haddad PR
Anal Chem; 2008 Apr; 80(7):2474-82. PubMed ID: 18327920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Methodology for porting retention prediction data from old to new columns and from conventional-scale to miniaturised ion chromatography systems.
Ng BK; Shellie RA; Dicinoski GW; Bloomfield C; Liu Y; Pohl CA; Haddad PR
J Chromatogr A; 2011 Aug; 1218(32):5512-9. PubMed ID: 21741652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Prediction of the effects of methanol and competing ion concentration on retention in the ion chromatographic separation of anionic and cationic pharmaceutically related compounds.
Zakaria P; Dicinoski G; Hanna-Brown M; Haddad PR
J Chromatogr A; 2010 Sep; 1217(39):6069-76. PubMed ID: 20732686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Application of retention modelling to the simulation of separation of organic anions in suppressed ion chromatography.
Zakaria P; Dicinoski GW; Ng BK; Shellie RA; Hanna-Brown M; Haddad PR
J Chromatogr A; 2009 Sep; 1216(38):6600-10. PubMed ID: 19683244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Development of an ion chromatographic gradient retention model from isocratic elution experiments.
Bolanca T; Cerjan-Stefanović S; Lusa M; Rogosić M; Ukić S
J Chromatogr A; 2006 Jul; 1121(2):228-35. PubMed ID: 16698028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Retention controlling and peak shape simulation in anion chromatography using multiple equilibrium model and stochastic theory.
Horváth K; Olajos M; Felinger A; Hajós P
J Chromatogr A; 2008 May; 1189(1-2):42-51. PubMed ID: 17719052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Computational method for modeling of gradient separation in ion-exchange chromatography.
Drgan V; Novic M; Novic M
J Chromatogr A; 2009 Sep; 1216(37):6502-10. PubMed ID: 19679313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Two-dimensional ion chromatography using tandem ion-exchange columns with gradient-pulse column switching.
Johns C; Shellie RA; Pohl CA; Haddad PR
J Chromatogr A; 2009 Oct; 1216(41):6931-7. PubMed ID: 19732899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Retention profiles and mechanism of anion separation on latex-based pellicular ion exchanger in ion chromatography.
Horváth K; Hajós P
J Chromatogr A; 2006 Feb; 1104(1-2):75-81. PubMed ID: 16337639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Prediction of elution bandwidth for purine compounds by a retention model in reversed-phase HPLC with linear-gradient elution.
Jin CH; Lee JW; Row KH
J Sep Sci; 2008 Jan; 31(1):23-9. PubMed ID: 18064619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Isocratic and gradient elution chromatography: a comparison in terms of speed, retention reproducibility and quantitation.
Schellinger AP; Carr PW
J Chromatogr A; 2006 Mar; 1109(2):253-66. PubMed ID: 16460742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A general strategy for performing temperature-programming in high performance liquid chromatography--prediction of segmented temperature gradients.
Wiese S; Teutenberg T; Schmidt TC
J Chromatogr A; 2011 Sep; 1218(39):6898-906. PubMed ID: 21872258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Retention models for isocratic and gradient elution in reversed-phase liquid chromatography.
Nikitas P; Pappa-Louisi A
J Chromatogr A; 2009 Mar; 1216(10):1737-55. PubMed ID: 18838140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Prediction of the chromatographic signal in gradient elution ion chromatography.
Bolanca T; Stefanović SC; Ukić S; Rogosić M; Lusa M
J Sep Sci; 2009 Sep; 32(17):2877-84. PubMed ID: 19714654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Fast ion chromatography using short anion exchange columns.
Tyrrell E; Shellie RA; Hilder EF; Pohl CA; Haddad PR
J Chromatogr A; 2009 Nov; 1216(48):8512-7. PubMed ID: 19846103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Methacrylate monolithic capillary columns for gradient peptide separations.
Pruim P; Ohman M; Huo Y; Schoenmakers PJ; Kok WT
J Chromatogr A; 2008 Oct; 1208(1-2):109-15. PubMed ID: 18771770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Probing the kinetic performance limits for ion chromatography. II. Gradient conditions for small ions.
Causon TJ; Hilder EF; Shellie RA; Haddad PR
J Chromatogr A; 2010 Jul; 1217(31):5063-8. PubMed ID: 20542515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Possibilities of retention prediction in fast gradient liquid chromatography. Part 1: Comparison of separation on packed fully porous, nonporous and monolithic columns.
Vyňuchalová K; Jandera P
J Chromatogr A; 2013 Feb; 1278():37-45. PubMed ID: 23336942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Rapid prediction and optimization of concentration conditions for preparative fractions by solid-phase extraction.
Jin Y; Xue XY; Zhang FF; Zhang J; Shi H; Xiao YS; Ke YX; Liang XM
J Sep Sci; 2008 Mar; 31(4):615-21. PubMed ID: 18266295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Novel criteria for fast searching for optimal method in gradient ion chromatography: an integrated approach.
Ukić Š; Bolanča T; Rogošić M
J Sep Sci; 2011 Apr; 34(7):780-8. PubMed ID: 21337513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
