231 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18328754)
1. The importance of the domain of applicability in QSAR modeling.
Weaver S; Gleeson MP
J Mol Graph Model; 2008 Jun; 26(8):1315-26. PubMed ID: 18328754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Unified QSAR approach to antimicrobials. Part 3: first multi-tasking QSAR model for input-coded prediction, structural back-projection, and complex networks clustering of antiprotozoal compounds.
Prado-Prado FJ; González-Díaz H; de la Vega OM; Ubeira FM; Chou KC
Bioorg Med Chem; 2008 Jun; 16(11):5871-80. PubMed ID: 18485714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Molecule kernels: a descriptor- and alignment-free quantitative structure-activity relationship approach.
Mohr JA; Jain BJ; Obermayer K
J Chem Inf Model; 2008 Sep; 48(9):1868-81. PubMed ID: 18767832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Quantitative structure-activity relationship modeling of the toxicity of organothiophosphate pesticides to Daphnia magna and Cyprinus carpio.
Zvinavashe E; Du T; Griff T; van den Berg HH; Soffers AE; Vervoort J; Murk AJ; Rietjens IM
Chemosphere; 2009 Jun; 75(11):1531-8. PubMed ID: 19376559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Critical assessment of QSAR models of environmental toxicity against Tetrahymena pyriformis: focusing on applicability domain and overfitting by variable selection.
Tetko IV; Sushko I; Pandey AK; Zhu H; Tropsha A; Papa E; Oberg T; Todeschini R; Fourches D; Varnek A
J Chem Inf Model; 2008 Sep; 48(9):1733-46. PubMed ID: 18729318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Combinatorial QSAR modeling of chemical toxicants tested against Tetrahymena pyriformis.
Zhu H; Tropsha A; Fourches D; Varnek A; Papa E; Gramatica P; Oberg T; Dao P; Cherkasov A; Tetko IV
J Chem Inf Model; 2008 Apr; 48(4):766-84. PubMed ID: 18311912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. QSAR study of selective ligands for the thyroid hormone receptor beta.
Liu H; Gramatica P
Bioorg Med Chem; 2007 Aug; 15(15):5251-61. PubMed ID: 17524652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Stochastic versus stepwise strategies for quantitative structure-activity relationship generation--how much effort may the mining for successful QSAR models take?
Horvath D; Bonachera F; Solov'ev V; Gaudin C; Varnek A
J Chem Inf Model; 2007; 47(3):927-39. PubMed ID: 17480052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Unified QSAR approach to antimicrobials. 4. Multi-target QSAR modeling and comparative multi-distance study of the giant components of antiviral drug-drug complex networks.
Prado-Prado FJ; Martinez de la Vega O; Uriarte E; Ubeira FM; Chou KC; González-Díaz H
Bioorg Med Chem; 2009 Jan; 17(2):569-75. PubMed ID: 19112024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. QSAR modeling using automatically updating correction libraries: application to a human plasma protein binding model.
Rodgers SL; Davis AM; Tomkinson NP; van de Waterbeemd H
J Chem Inf Model; 2007; 47(6):2401-7. PubMed ID: 17887744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A stepwise approach for defining the applicability domain of SAR and QSAR models.
Dimitrov S; Dimitrova G; Pavlov T; Dimitrova N; Patlewicz G; Niemela J; Mekenyan O
J Chem Inf Model; 2005; 45(4):839-49. PubMed ID: 16045276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Development of a chirality-sensitive flexibility descriptor for 3+3D-QSAR.
Dervarics M; Otvös F; Martinek TA
J Chem Inf Model; 2006; 46(3):1431-8. PubMed ID: 16711763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Predicting physical properties of emerging compounds with limited physical and chemical data: QSAR model uncertainty and applicability to military munitions.
Bennett ER; Clausen J; Linkov E; Linkov I
Chemosphere; 2009 Nov; 77(10):1412-8. PubMed ID: 19793608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Combinatorial QSAR modeling of specificity and subtype selectivity of ligands binding to serotonin receptors 5HT1E and 5HT1F.
Wang XS; Tang H; Golbraikh A; Tropsha A
J Chem Inf Model; 2008 May; 48(5):997-1013. PubMed ID: 18470978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Mechanistic applicability domains for non-animal based prediction of toxicological endpoints. QSAR analysis of the schiff base applicability domain for skin sensitization.
Roberts DW; Aptula AO; Patlewicz G
Chem Res Toxicol; 2006 Sep; 19(9):1228-33. PubMed ID: 16978028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparative QSAR studies of CYP1A2 inhibitor flavonoids using 2D and 3D descriptors.
Roy K; Roy PP
Chem Biol Drug Des; 2008 Nov; 72(5):370-82. PubMed ID: 19012573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A comparison of DEMETRA individual QSARs with an index for evaluation of uncertainty.
Porcelli C; Roncaglioni A; Chana A; Benfenati E
Chemosphere; 2008 May; 71(10):1845-52. PubMed ID: 18384837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. High confidence predictions of drug-drug interactions: predicting affinities for cytochrome P450 2C9 with multiple computational methods.
Hudelson MG; Ketkar NS; Holder LB; Carlson TJ; Peng CC; Waldher BJ; Jones JP
J Med Chem; 2008 Feb; 51(3):648-54. PubMed ID: 18211009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Applicability domains for classification problems: Benchmarking of distance to models for Ames mutagenicity set.
Sushko I; Novotarskyi S; Körner R; Pandey AK; Cherkasov A; Li J; Gramatica P; Hansen K; Schroeter T; Müller KR; Xi L; Liu H; Yao X; Öberg T; Hormozdiari F; Dao P; Sahinalp C; Todeschini R; Polishchuk P; Artemenko A; Kuz'min V; Martin TM; Young DM; Fourches D; Muratov E; Tropsha A; Baskin I; Horvath D; Marcou G; Muller C; Varnek A; Prokopenko VV; Tetko IV
J Chem Inf Model; 2010 Dec; 50(12):2094-111. PubMed ID: 21033656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Structure-based approach to pharmacophore identification, in silico screening, and three-dimensional quantitative structure-activity relationship studies for inhibitors of Trypanosoma cruzi dihydrofolate reductase function.
Schormann N; Senkovich O; Walker K; Wright DL; Anderson AC; Rosowsky A; Ananthan S; Shinkre B; Velu S; Chattopadhyay D
Proteins; 2008 Dec; 73(4):889-901. PubMed ID: 18536013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
