These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
4. Dichoptic visual masking reveals that early binocular neurons exhibit weak interocular suppression: implications for binocular vision and visual awareness. Macknik SL; Martinez-Conde S J Cogn Neurosci; 2004; 16(6):1049-59. PubMed ID: 15298791 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A psychoanatomical investigation of the blanking phenomenon. McAnany JJ; Levine MW Vision Res; 2005 Jan; 45(2):193-203. PubMed ID: 15581920 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Monocular rivalry exhibits three hallmarks of binocular rivalry: evidence for common processes. O'Shea RP; Parker A; La Rooy D; Alais D Vision Res; 2009 Mar; 49(7):671-81. PubMed ID: 19232529 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The structure of stereoscopic masking: position, disparity, and size tuning. Tyler CW; Kontsevich LL Vision Res; 2005 Nov; 45(25-26):3096-108. PubMed ID: 16168458 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Temporal frequency and contrast tagging bias the type of competition in interocular switch rivalry. Silver MA; Logothetis NK Vision Res; 2007 Feb; 47(4):532-43. PubMed ID: 17182075 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effect of a disparity pattern on the perception of direction: non-retinal information masks retinal information. Ishii M Vision Res; 2009 Jun; 49(12):1563-8. PubMed ID: 19324065 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Preserved gain control for luminance contrast during binocular rivalry suppression. Watanabe K; Paik Y; Blake R Vision Res; 2004 Dec; 44(26):3065-71. PubMed ID: 15474579 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The interaction between binocular rivalry and negative afterimages. Gilroy LA; Blake R Curr Biol; 2005 Oct; 15(19):1740-4. PubMed ID: 16213820 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Central factors contributing to para-contrast modulation of contour and brightness perception. Breitmeyer BG; Ziegler R; Hauske G Vis Neurosci; 2007; 24(2):191-6. PubMed ID: 17640410 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Competition in bistable vision is attribute-specific. Grossmann JK; Dobbins AC Vision Res; 2006 Feb; 46(3):285-92. PubMed ID: 16045956 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Contrast sensitivity of form and motion discrimination during binocular rivalry. Li DF; Freeman AW; Alais D Vision Res; 2005 May; 45(10):1255-63. PubMed ID: 15733958 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The role of monocularly visible regions in depth and surface perception. Harris JM; Wilcox LM Vision Res; 2009 Nov; 49(22):2666-85. PubMed ID: 19577589 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Depth of interocular suppression associated with continuous flash suppression, flash suppression, and binocular rivalry. Tsuchiya N; Koch C; Gilroy LA; Blake R J Vis; 2006 Sep; 6(10):1068-78. PubMed ID: 17132078 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Binocular contrast interactions: dichoptic masking is not a single process. Baker DH; Meese TS Vision Res; 2007 Nov; 47(24):3096-107. PubMed ID: 17904610 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Psychophysical evidence for two routes to suppression before binocular summation of signals in human vision. Baker DH; Meese TS; Summers RJ Neuroscience; 2007 Apr; 146(1):435-48. PubMed ID: 17346895 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The motion-induced position shift depends on the visual awareness of motion. Watanabe K Vision Res; 2005 Sep; 45(19):2580-6. PubMed ID: 16022879 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]